[1]蒋钰辉 戴希勇** 申磊.单孔胸腔镜与开胸纤维板剥脱术治疗慢性结核性脓胸的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2023,01(2):98-102.
　Jiang Yuhui,Dai Xiyong,Shen Lei..A Comparative Study Between Uniportal Videoassisted Thoracoscopic Decortication and Thoracotomy Decortication for the Treatment of Chronic Tuberculous Empyema[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2023,01(2):98-102.
点击复制

单孔胸腔镜与开胸纤维板剥脱术治疗慢性结核性脓胸的比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2023年2期
页码:
98-102
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Comparative Study Between Uniportal Videoassisted Thoracoscopic Decortication and Thoracotomy Decortication for the Treatment of Chronic Tuberculous Empyema
作者:
蒋钰辉 戴希勇** 申磊
(武汉市肺科医院外科，武汉430030)
Author(s):
Jiang Yuhui;  Dai Xiyong;  Shen Lei.
Department of Surgery, Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital, Wuhan 430030, China
关键词:
结核; 脓胸; 单孔胸腔镜手术; 比较研究
Keywords:
Tuberculosis; Empyema; Uniportal videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery; Comparative study
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨单孔胸腔镜纤维板剥脱术的安全性和效果。方法回顾性分析2018年1月~2020年12月因慢性结核性脓胸行胸膜纤维板剥脱术198例临床资料。2019年12月前112例行开胸手术(开胸组)，之后86例行单孔胸腔镜手术(单孔组)。2组基线数据差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。比较2组围手术期指标和术后恢复指标。结果与开胸组相比，单孔组手术时间较长［(272.5±121.2)min vs. (230.5±68.8) min，t=3.080，P=0.002］，但术后引流时间和术后住院时间较短［8.0(6.0,11.0) d vs. 9.0(7.0,17.0) d，Z=-3.218，P=0.001；9.5(8.0,13.0) d vs. 13.5(11.0,16.0)d，Z=-5377，P=0.000］，并发症发生率也较低［41.9%(36/86) vs. 62.5%(70/112)， χ2=8.331，P=0.004］。2组术中出血量、术后肺复张时间和治疗效果分级差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与开胸手术相比，单孔胸腔镜纤维板剥脱术能够缩短术后引流时间和术后住院时间，降低手术并发症发生率，加速术后康复，治疗效果也与之相当。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and effect of uniportal videoassisted thoracoscopic decortication in the treatment of chronic tuberculous empyema.MethodsA total of 198 patients of chronic tuberculous empyema who underwent decortication in our department from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 112 patients who underwent thoracotomy before December 2019 (thoracotomy group), and 86 patients thereafter underwent uniportal videoassisted thoracoscopic decortication (UVATD group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>005). The perioperative indicators and postoperative recovery indicators were compared between the two groups.ResultsAs compared with the thoracotomy group, the UVATD group had longer operation time ［(272.5±121.2) min vs. (230.5±68.8) min, t=3.080, P=0.002］, shorter postoperative drainage time and postoperative hospital stay ［8.0 (6.0, 11.0) d vs. 9.0 (7.0, 170) d, Z=-3.218, P=0.001; 9.5 (8.0,13.0) d vs. 13.5 (11.0,16.0) d, Z=-5.377, P=0.000］, and lower surgical complication rate ［41.9% (36/86) vs. 62.5% (70/112), χ2=8.331,P=0.004］. There were no significant differences between the two groups in amount of intraoperative hemorrhage, postoperative pulmonary reexpansion duration and grading of treatment effect (P>0.05).ConclusionAs compared with thoracotomy, the uniportal videoassisted thoracoscopic decortication can shorten the postoperative drainage duration and postoperative hospital stay, reduce surgical complications, accelerate postoperative rehabilitation, and achieve a similar therapeutic effect.

参考文献/References:

[1]许军利,陈其亮,李军孝,等.闭合式与开放式纤维板剥脱术治疗慢性结核性脓胸的对比研究.临床和实验医学杂志,2018,17(23):2545-2548.
[2]Majeed FA,Zafar U,Chatha SS,et al.Decortication as an option for empyema thoracis.J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,2020,30(3):313-317.
[3]周逸鸣,洪旗,尹桂东,等.单孔胸腔镜全纤维板剥脱术治疗Ⅲ期结核性脓胸158例临床分析.中华外科杂志,2022,60(1):90-94.
[4]Majeed FA,Chatha SS,Zafar U,et al.VATS thoracoscopic decortication for empyema thoracic:a retrospective experience and analysis of 162 cases.J Pak Med Assoc,2021,71(2A):502-504.
[5]Jindal R,Nar AS,Mishra A,et al.Videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thoracotomy in the management of empyema:a comparative study.J Minim Access Surg,2021,17(4):470-478.
[6]Reichert M,Psentrup B,Hecker A,et al.Thoracotomy versus videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in stage III empyema：an analysis of 217 consecutive patients.Surg Endosc,2018,32(6):2664-2675.
[7]陈海,徐先全,徐宁,等.电视胸腔镜下脓胸清除术治疗慢性结核性脓胸的临床疗效.安徽医学,2020,41(7):741-744.
[8]Kumar A,Asaf BB,Lingaraju VC,et al.Thoracoscopic decortication of stage III tuberculous empyema is effective and safe in selected cases.Ann Thorac Surg,2017,104(5):1688-1694.
[9]伍治强,唐小军.单孔胸腔镜手术应用进展.中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(6):553-556.
[10]GuidoGuerrero W,BolaosCubillo A,GonzálezRivas D.Singleport videoassisted thoracic surgery (VATS):advanced procedures & update.J Thorac Dis,2018,10(Suppl 14):S1652-S1661.
[11]Zhou Y,Li X,Dai J,et al.Uniportal thoracoscopic decortication for stage III tuberculous empyema with severe rib crowding. Ann Thorac Surg，2021，112(1):289-294.
[12]蒋钰辉,刘小玉,高超,等.单孔胸腔镜胸膜纤维板剥脱术治疗慢性结核性脓胸.中华胸心血管外科杂志,2022,38(1):18-22.
[13]Aljehani Y,Alabkary S.Single incision VATS decortication for 3rd stage empyema.Clin Case Rep,2018,6(11):2144-2146.
[14]Reichert M,Psentrup B,Hecker A,et al.Lung decortication in phase III pleural empyema by videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS):results of a learning curve study.J Thorac Dis,2018,10(7):4311-4320.
[15]岳鹏,张瑜,蔺瑞江,等.单孔胸腔镜与常规开胸手术治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ期脓胸的效果观察.中国微创外科杂志,2018,18(6):486-490.
[16]张运曾,金锋,王成.电视辅助胸腔镜手术在结核性脓胸治疗中的应用及进展.中国防痨杂志,2017,39(5):525-528.
[17]Sikander N,Ahmad T,Mazcuri M,et al.Role of antituberculous treatment in the outcome of decortication for chronic tuberculous empyema.Cureus,2021,13(1):e12583.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：武汉市卫健委科研项目基金(WX21Q40)；武汉市中青年医学骨干人才培养工程［武卫通(2020)55号］**通讯作者，Email：daixiyong71@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-05-17