[1]洪子强① 白向豆 崔百强① 金大成 成涛① 吴旭升① 苟云久**.机器人手术与传统胸腔镜手术治疗后纵隔神经源性肿瘤的对比研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2023,01(2):93-97.
　Hong Ziqiang,Bai Xiangdou*,Cui Baiqiang,et al.A Comparative Study Between Robotassisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Conventional Thoracoscopic Surgery for Posterior Mediastinal Neurogenic Tumors[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2023,01(2):93-97.
点击复制

机器人手术与传统胸腔镜手术治疗后纵隔神经源性肿瘤的对比研究()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2023年2期
页码:
93-97
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Comparative Study Between Robotassisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Conventional Thoracoscopic Surgery for Posterior Mediastinal Neurogenic Tumors
作者:
洪子强① 白向豆 崔百强① 金大成 成涛① 吴旭升① 苟云久**
(甘肃省人民医院胸外科，兰州730000)
Author(s):
Hong Ziqiang;  Bai Xiangdou*;  Cui Baiqiang;  et al.
*Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China
关键词:
机器人辅助胸腔镜手术; 电视胸腔镜手术; 纵隔肿瘤; 神经源性肿瘤
Keywords:
Robotassisted thoracoscopic surgery; Videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery; Mediastinal tumor; Neurogenic tumor
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的比较机器人手术(robotassisted thoracoscopic surgery，RATS)与传统胸腔镜手术(videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery，VATS)治疗后纵隔神经源性肿瘤的短期疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析2014年6月~2022年8月同一术者完成的75例胸腔镜治疗后纵隔神经源性肿瘤的临床资料。其中RATS组37例，肿瘤直径(4.34±1.25)cm；VATS组38例，肿瘤直径(4.33±1.58)cm。术前均使用MRI或增强CT定位评估肿瘤。比较2组手术指标。结果2组均成功完成后纵隔神经源性肿瘤切除，无围手术期死亡。与VATS组相比，RATS组总手术时间短［(72.3±17.2)min vs. (81.7±14.5)min，t=-2.567，P=0.012］，术中出血量少［(49.6±20.8)ml vs. (71.1±13.1)ml，t=-5.355，P=0.000］，术后24 h胸腔引流量少［(68.9±28.1)ml vs. (82.4±21.3)ml，t=-2.340，P=0.022］，术后住院时间短［(3.2±1.3)d vs. (4.3±1.1)d，t=-3.699，P=0.000］，但住院费用高［(5.2±0.3)万元vs. (3.8±0.3)万元，t=23.193，P=0.000］。2组中转开胸、术后胸腔引流时间和并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与VATS相比，RATS治疗后纵隔神经源性肿瘤在手术时间、术中出血量、术后胸腔引流量和术后住院时间方面具有优势。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the shortterm efficacy and safety of robotassisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) with conventional videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumors.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 75 patients with mediastinal neurogenic tumors after thoracoscopic surgery completed by the same operator from June 2014 to August 2022. There were 37 patients in the RATS group, with a tumor diameter of (4.34±1.25) cm, and 38 patients in the VATS group, with a tumor diameter of (4.33±1.58) cm. The tumors were localized and evaluated in all the patients preoperatively by using MRI or enhanced CT. The operative indexes of the two groups were compared.ResultsResection of posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumor was successfully completed in both groups without perioperative deaths. Compared with the VATS group, the RATS group got a shorter total operative time ［(72.3±17.2) min vs. (81.7±14.5) min, t=-2.567, P=0012］, less intraoperative bleeding ［(49.6±20.8) ml vs. (71.1±13.1) ml, t=-5.355, P=0.000］, less postoperative chest drainage within 24 h ［(68.9±28.1) ml vs. (82.4±21.3) ml, t=-2.340, P=0.022］, and shorter postoperative hospital stay ［(3.2±1.3) d vs. (4.3±1.1) d, t=-3.699, P=0.000］. But the hospitalization expense in the RATS group was higher ［(5.2±0.3)×104 yuan vs. (3.8±0.3)×104 yuan, t=23.193, P=0.000］. No statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in terms of intermediate chest opening, postoperative chest drainage time, and complication rate (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared to the VATS, the RATS for posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumors has advantages in total operative time, intraoperative bleeding, chest drainage volume and postoperative hospital stay.

参考文献/References:

[1]Lacquet M,Moons J,Ceulemans LJ,et al.Surgery for mediastinal neurogenic tumours:a 25year singlecentre retrospective study.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2021,32(5):737-743.
[2]Yun PJ,Huang TW,Li YF,et al.Symptomatic pericardial schwannoma treated with videoassisted thoracic surgery:a case report.J Thorac Dis,2016,8(5):E349-E352.
[3]Marchevsky AM,Balzer B.Mediastinal tumors of peripheral nerve origin (socalled neurogenic tumors).Mediastinum,2020,4:32.
[4]Ratbi MB,El OF,Arsalane A,et al.Surgery of benign neurogenic tumors in adults:single institution experience.Pan Afr Med J,2014,19:288.
[5]Landreneau RJ,Dowling RD,Ferson PF.Thoracoscopic resection of a posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumor.Chest,1992,102(4):1288-1290.
[6]Ujiie H,Gregor A,Yasufuku K.Minimally invasive surgical approaches for lung cancer.Expert Rev Respir Med,2019,13(6): 571-578.
[7]韩丁培,项捷,李鹤成,等.机器人辅助与传统IvorLewis食管癌根治术近期疗效的比较.中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(5):404-407.
[8]许世广,童向东,王述民,等.机器人辅助胸腔镜下肺叶切除术16例报告.中国微创外科杂志,2013,13(9):806-809.
[9]Chen XF,Ma QY,Wang SH,et al.Surgical treatment of posterior mediastinal neurogenic tumors.J Surg Oncol,2019,119(6):807-813.
[10]Cilleruelo RA,Borrego PH,Castanedo AM.Endoscopic management of tracheal neurofibroma.Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed),2020,56(2):116.
[11]Temelkova I,Tchernev G,Giant P.Neurofibroma in patient with plexiform sciatic neurofibroma and neurofibromatosis type 1.Open Access Maced J Med Sci,2019,7(8):1346-1349.
[12]Liu SZ,Zhou X,Song A,et al.Giant plexiform neurofibroma of thigh in a young woman.Postgrad Med J,2019,95(1126):459-460.
[13]宋朝晖,冯彪,杨玲玲,等.纵隔神经源性肿瘤磁共振成像的诊断价值分析.实用医学影像杂志,2018,19(2):141-143.
[14]曹正浓,刘丹,王雅楠,等.儿童纵隔神经源性肿瘤单中心外科治疗经验.临床小儿外科杂志,2022,21(3):231-235.
[15]Horiuchi A,Muraji T,Tsugawa C,et al.Thoracic neuroblastoma: outcome of incomplete resection.Pediatr Surg Int,2004,20(9):714-718.
[16]赵长明,吕静,孙小康,等.电视胸腔镜手术治疗后纵隔良性神经源性肿瘤.中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2013,20(2):241-243.
[17]Ruurda JP,Hanlo PW,Hennipman A,et al.Robotassisted thoracoscopic resection of a benign mediastinal neurogenic tumor:technical note.Neurosurgery,2003,52(2):462-464.
[18]柏启州,王述民,苟云久,等.达芬奇机器人手术治疗纵隔肿瘤的病例对照研究.中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2018,25(5):382-386.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：甘肃省重点研发项目（22YF7FA095）；甘肃省卫生健康行业科研管理项目(GSWSKY2020-50)**通讯作者，Email：gouyunjiu@163.com ①(甘肃中医药大学第一临床医学院，兰州730000)
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-05-17