[1]明葛东 朱鸿喜** 陈晨 孟德诚 戴文文.一针双线单孔单隧道腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术[J].中国微创外科杂志,2019,01(10):929-932.
　Ming Gedong,Zhu Hongxi,Chen Chen,et al.Laparoscopic High Ligation of Hernia Sac With One-needle Double-suture via Single-port and Single-tunnel[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2019,01(10):929-932.
点击复制

一针双线单孔单隧道腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2019年10期
页码:
929-932
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Laparoscopic High Ligation of Hernia Sac With One-needle Double-suture via Single-port and Single-tunnel
作者:
明葛东 朱鸿喜** 陈晨 孟德诚 戴文文
（江苏省盐城市妇幼保健院小儿外科，盐城224001）
Author(s):
Ming Gedong;  Zhu Hongxi;  Chen Chen;  et al.
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Yancheng Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Yancheng 224001, China
关键词:
单孔; 腹腔镜; 疝囊高位结扎术
Keywords:
Single-port; Laparoscopy; High ligation of hernial sac
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨一针双线单孔单隧道腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2017年10月~2018年10月100例腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术临床资料，单孔及双孔组各50例。比较2组手术时间、住院时间、住院费用、术后疼痛评分及并发症等指标，记录切口愈合及复发情况。结果100例均顺利完成手术。与双孔组比较，单孔组手术时间短［单侧(10.3±1.1)min vs.(12.4±1.4)min，t=-7.742，P=0.000；双侧(13.5±1.3)min vs.(16.1±1.3)min，t=-4.576，P=0.000］，疼痛评分低［(2.4±0.3）分vs.（3.5±0.9）分，t=-8.553，P=0.000］。2组术后住院时间、住院费用差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。随访5~17个月，平均12.1月。双孔组2例皮下线结反应，1例复发，单孔组均未发生，但差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；双孔组8例腹壁有可见瘢痕，单孔组均无可见瘢痕（P=0.006）。结论一针双线单孔单隧道腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术是一种安全有效的手术方法，既避免在腹壁上戳孔，同时又确保完全腹膜外疝囊高位结扎，手术时间短，术后疼痛轻，且不额外增加患者经济负担，安全有效，值得在基层医院推广。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy of laparoscopic high ligation of the hernia sac with one-needle double-suture via a single-port and a single tunnel for indirect inguinal hernia in children. MethodsA respective analysis was made on 100 cases of children with laparoscopic high ligation of the hernia sac from October 2017 to October 2018. The patients were divided into single-port group or double-port group according to the parental choice, with 50 children in each group. The operation time, hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, postoperative pain assessment and complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe operations were completed smoothly in all the patients. The operative time of the single-port group was significantly shorter than that of the double-port group ［one-side: (10.3±1.1) min vs. (12.4±1.4) min, t=-7.742, P=0.000; both sides: (13.5±1.3) min vs. (16.1±1.3) min, t=-4.576, P=0.000］. The pain score of the single-port group was significant lower than the double-port group ［(2.4±0.3) vs. (3.5±0.9) points, t=-8.553, P=0.000］. However, the hospital stay and hospitalization expenses of the single-port group had no significant difference as compared with the double-port group (P>0.05). All the patients were followed up for 5-17 months (mean, 12.1 months). The double-port group had 2 cases of subcutaneous line-knot reaction and 1 case of recurrence, and no complication was found in the single-port group (P>0.05). Eight cases in the double-port group had visible operative scars on the abdominal wall, and there was no visible scar in the single-port group (P=0.006).ConclusionsOne-needle double-suture via single-port and single-tunnel laparoscopic hernia sac high ligation is a safe and effective operation method, which not only avoids the puncture on the abdominal wall, but also ensures the high ligation of the complete extraperitoneal hernia sac. It is safe and effective, which should be popularizing in the primary level hospitals.

参考文献/References:

[1]莫崖冰,谢俐,肖新辉,等.单孔腹腔镜双钩疝针完全腹膜外疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的疗效分析.临床小儿外科杂志,2017,16(5):491-495.
[2]张丰年,李炳,陈卫兵,等.经脐单部位腹腔镜下应用注射器行疝囊高位结扎术42例.临床小儿外科杂志,2018,17(1):51-53.
[3]程康文,王贵和,孙学工,等.小儿单侧腹股沟疝中腹腔镜探查预防对侧异时性疝分析.中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2016,10(4):283-287.
[4]崔钊,鲁莹,李秋琳,等.免水分离的双钩套扎针辅助单孔腹腔镜内环腹膜外结扎术.中国微创外科杂志,2019,19（2）:157-160．
[5]Bruzoni M,Jaramillo JD,Kastenberg ZJ,et al.Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic transcutaneous inguinal herniorraphy with high transfixation suture ligature of the hernia sac.J Pediatr Surg,2015,50(10):1767-1771.
[6]Voepel-Lewis T,Merkel S,Tait AR,et al.The reliability and validity of the Face,Legs,Activity,Cry,Consolablity observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment.Anesth Analg,2002,95(5):1224-1229.
[7]刘雪来,王文博,杨晓锋,等.水分离腹壁缝合器辅助单孔腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝内环结扎术.中国微创外科杂志,2019,19（5）:415-417.
[8]李辉,黄河.经脐单部位双孔腹腔镜下小儿疝囊高位结扎术的疗效（附120例报告）.中国内镜杂志,2017,23(7):104-108.
[9]刘雪来,费川,张永婷,等.小儿腹腔镜单部位腹内缝扎与单孔腹膜外结扎关闭腹股沟内环的疗效对比.中华普通外科杂志,2017,32(4):328-331.
[10]Yamoto M,Morotomi Y,Yamamoto M,et al.Single incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia in children:an initial report.Surg Endosc,2011,25(5):1531-1534.
[11]周立军,李功俊,沈刚,等.两种经脐单孔腹腔镜手术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的对比研究.腹腔镜外科杂志,2017,22(9):696-699.
[12]李俊江,王坤,穆速,等.“穿针引线”法在腹腔镜小儿腹股沟疝手术中的应用体会.腹腔镜外科杂志,2018,23(5):381-384.
[13]张翔,寇明智,张宏伟,等.腹腔镜单针双线法治疗婴幼儿腹股沟斜疝的临床研究.临床小儿外科杂志,2018,17（6）:462-465.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：江苏省妇幼健康科研基金项目（F201854）；江苏省盐城市医学科技发展计划项目（YK2017045）**通讯作者，E-mail：497841157@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-01-09