[1]杨丽霞 崔玮 李伟玲 夏天 左欣**.基于倾向性评分匹配的经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢囊肿的疗效分析[J].中国微创外科杂志,2023,01(8):587-591.
　Yang Lixia,Cui Wei,Li Weiling,et al.Comparison of the Efficacy of Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery and Traditional Laparoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Ovarian Cysts: a Propensity Score Matching Study[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2023,01(8):587-591.
点击复制

基于倾向性评分匹配的经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢囊肿的疗效分析()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2023年8期
页码:
587-591
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the Efficacy of Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery and Traditional Laparoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Ovarian Cysts: a Propensity Score Matching Study
作者:
杨丽霞 崔玮 李伟玲 夏天 左欣**
(江苏大学附属宜兴医院妇产科，宜兴214200)
Author(s):
Yang Lixia;  Cui Wei;  Li Weiling;  et al.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing 214200, China
关键词:
经脐单孔腹腔镜手术; 卵巢囊肿; 腹腔镜; 倾向性评分匹配
Keywords:
Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery; Ovarian cyst; Laparoscopy; Propensity score matching
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢囊肿的疗效和安全性。方法回顾性分析2020年1月~2021年12月我院252例腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术的临床资料，其中单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术58例(单孔组)，传统腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术194例(四孔组)，经倾向性评分匹配(propensity score matching，PSM)，最终49对数据成功匹配，比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、术后胃肠道恢复排气时间、住院时间、术中囊肿溢出率、术后围术期疼痛评分、术后瘢痕满意度、术后并发症发生率、住院总费用及囊肿复发率等。结果单孔组和四孔组比较，住院总费用较高［15 125.3(13 851.2,16 420.0)元 vs.13 439.3(11 993.1,15 804.9)元，Z=-2.995，P=0.003］，术后胃肠道恢复排气时间缩短［15.8(14.0,18.0)h vs.19.0(16.6,22.2)h，Z=-4.973，P=0.000］，住院时间缩短［5(5，6)d vs.7(6，7)d，Z=-4.376，P=0.000］，术后24 h 疼痛评分较低［4(4，5)分 vs.5(4，6)分，Z=-4.225，P=0.000］，术后切口瘢痕满意度较高(97.9% vs.87.3%， χ2=4.404，P=0.036)。2组手术时间［80(60，90) min vs.70(50，90)min，Z=-1.005，P=0.315］、术中出血量［20(10，50) ml vs.20(10，50)ml，Z=-0.154,P=0.878］、术中囊肿溢出率［20.4%(10/49) vs.20.4%(10/49), χ2=0.000,P=1.000］、术后并发症发生率［4.1%(2/49)vs.82%(4/49)， χ2=0.178，P=0.673］均无统计学差异。2组患者短期随访均无囊肿复发。结论单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剥除术是一种安全、有效的术式，术后短期疼痛及切口满意度较传统腹腔镜手术具有显著优势。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery (TULESS) in the treatment of ovarian cysts.MethodsClinical data of 252 patients who underwent laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 58 cases of singleport laparoscopy resection (singleport group) and 194 cases of traditional laparoscopic resection (fourport group). By using the propensity score matching (PSM), a total of 49 pairs of data were successfully matched. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative gastrointestinal recovery exhaust time, hospitalization time, intraoperative cyst overflow rate, postoperative pain visual analogue score (VAS), postoperative scar satisfaction, postoperative complication rate, total hospitalization cost, and cyst recurrence rate were compared between the two groups.ResultsCompared with the fourport group, the singleport group had higher total cost of hospitalization ［15 125.3(13 851.2,16 420.0) yuan vs. 13 439.3(11 993.1,15 804.9) yuan, Z=-2.995,P=0.003］, earlier postoperative gastrointestinal recovery exhaust time ［15.8(14,18) h vs. 19.0(16.6,22.2) h, Z=-4.973, P=0.000］, shorter hospital stay ［5(5,6) d vs. 7(6,7) d, Z=-4.376, P=0.000］, lower VAS score at 24 hours after operation ［4(4,5) points vs. 5(4,6) points, Z=-4.225, P=0.000］, and higher satisfaction of postoperative incision scar (97.9% vs. 873%, χ2=4.404, P=0.036). There were no significant differences in operation time ［80(60, 90) min vs. 70(50, 90) min, Z=-1.005, P=0315］, intraoperative blood loss ［20(10,50) ml vs. 20(10,50) ml, Z=-0.154, P=0.878］, intraoperative cyst discharge rate ［20.4%(10/49） vs. 20.4%（10/49）, χ2=0.000, P=1.000］, postoperative complication rate ［4.1%(2/49) vs. 8.2%(4/49), χ2=0178, P=0.673］ between the two groups.There was no cyst recurrence in both groups during shortterm followups.ConclusionFor ovarian cystectomy, TULESS is a safe, effective approach with less shortterm pain and better incision satisfaction than traditional laparoscopic surgery.

参考文献/References:

[1]Farghaly SA. Current diagnosis and management of ovarian cysts. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol,2014,41(6):609-612.
[2]Schmitt A, Crochet P, Knight S, et al. Singleport laparoscopy vs conventional laparoscopy in benign adnexal diseases: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2017,24(7):1083-1095.
[3]中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科内镜学组.妇科腹腔镜诊治规范.中华妇产科杂志,2012,47(9):716-718.
[4]中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科单孔腹腔镜手术技术协助组.妇科单孔腹腔镜手术技术的专家意见.中华妇产科杂志,2016,51(10):724-726.
[5]郑莹,熊光武,刘娟,等.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术脐部切口管理专家共识(2022年版).实用妇产科杂志,2022,38(3):192-197.
[6]王琴,张亮,刘业海,等.V形切口在腮腺良性肿瘤手术中的应用效果.安徽医药,2022,43(7):796-799.
[7]Tsiampa E, Spartalis E, Tsourouflis G, et al. Impact on ovarian reserve after minimally invasive singleport laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in patients with benign ovarian cysts: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J Clin Pract,2021,75(12):e14875.
[8]Schmitt A, Crochet P, Baumstark K, et al. Effect of laparoscopy by singleport endoscopic access in benign adnexal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials,2018,19(1):38.
[9]黄琳娟,代雪林,唐均英,等.“三位一体”认识和处理单孔腹腔镜的“筷子效应”.医学与哲学(B),2018,39(9):76-77,86.
[10]胡三元.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术的再认识.山东大学学报(医学版),2019,57(12):1-4,25.
[11]Wang X, Li Y. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of singleport laparoscopy, threeport laparoscopy and conventional laparotomy in removing giant ovarian cysts larger than 15 cm. BMC Surg,2021,21(1):205.
[12]Eisenberg N, VolodarskyPerel A, Brochu I, et al. Short and longterm complications of intraoperative benign ovarian cyst spillage: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2021,28(5):957-970.
[13]Hizkiyahu R, Yahav L, Yakovi S, et al. Short and longterm outcomes of intraoperative spillage during laparoscopic removal of benign ovarian cysts. Surg Endosc,2020,34(9):3883-3887.
[14]黄达元,孙莉,陈学红,等.基于无瘤技术自制取物袋在经脐三孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术中的应用.中国微创外科杂志,2021,21(5):464-466.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：江苏省妇幼保健协会科研项目（FYX202119）**通讯作者，Email:staff758@yxph.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-11-08