[1]付汉川 晋学飞 李宏岩**.2种微创方法治疗CT值≤1200 HU的2~4 cm肾结石的疗效对比[J].中国微创外科杂志,2023,01(8):576-580.
　Fu Hanchuan,Jin Xuefei,Li Hongyan..Comparative Study of Minipercutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in the Treatment of 2-4 cm Renal Stones With CT Value ≤1200 HU[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2023,01(8):576-580.
点击复制

2种微创方法治疗CT值≤1200 HU的2~4 cm肾结石的疗效对比()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2023年8期
页码:
576-580
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative Study of Minipercutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in the Treatment of 2-4 cm Renal Stones With CT Value ≤1200 HU
作者:
付汉川 晋学飞 李宏岩**
(吉林大学中日联谊医院泌尿外科，长春130033)
Author(s):
Fu Hanchuan;  Jin Xuefei;  Li Hongyan.
ChinaJapan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130033, China
关键词:
肾结石; 输尿管软镜碎石术; 微通道经皮肾镜取石术; CT值
Keywords:
Renal stone; Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy; Minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy; CT value
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的比较输尿管软镜碎石术(flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy，FURL)与微通道经皮肾镜取石术(minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy，mPCNL)治疗CT值≤1200 HU的2~4 cm肾结石的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2020 年1月~2021年12月72例CT值≤1200 HU的2~4 cm肾结石的临床资料，36例行FURL(软镜组)，36例行mPCNL(肾镜组)，比较2组手术时间、术后疼痛视觉模拟评分（Visual Analogue Scale,VAS）、肾功能、感染情况和结石清除率。结果所有手术均顺利完成。2组手术时间差异无显著性［(75.4±32.0)min vs.(82.1±28.3)min，t=-0.944,P=0.349］。肾镜组术后住院时间明显长于软镜组［(6.0±2.4)d vs.(4.4±1.3)d，t=-3.481,P=0.001］，术后疼痛VAS评分明显高于软镜组［(5.2±1.2)分vs.(2.5±0.8)分，t=-10.925,P=0.000］,术后血红蛋白下降幅度更大［16.5(15.0,23.0)g/L vs. 6.5(1.5,13.0)g/L，Z=-4.894,P=0.000］。2组术后1周、3个月结石清除率差异无显著性［91.7%(33/36)vs.94.4%(34/36)， χ2=0.215，P=0.643；97.2%(35/36)vs.97.2%(35/36)， χ2=0.000，P=1.000］。2组肾功能、术后发热及感染情况差异无显著性(P>005)。结论对于CT值≤1200 U的2~4 cm肾结石，FURL与mPCNL具有相同的疗效，但FURL术中出血更少、创伤更小，术后恢复时间更短，住院时间更短。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficiency of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) and minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL）in the treatment of 2-4 cm kidney stones with CT value ≤1200 HU.MethodsA total of 72 cases of kidney stones with CT value ≤1200 HU from January 2020 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 36 cases treated with FURL (FURL group) and 36 cases treated with mPCNL (mPCNL group). The operation time, pain visual analogue score (VAS), renal function, infection status, and stone clearance rate were compared between the two groups.ResultsAll the operations were successfully completed. There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups ［(75.4±320) min vs. (82.1±28.3) min, t=-0.944, P=0.349］. The mPCNL group had longer postoperative hospital stay ［(6.0±24) d vs. (4.4±1.3) d, t=-3.481, P=0.001］, higher postoperative VAS score ［(5.2±1.2) points vs. (2.5±0.8) points, t=-10.925, P=0.000］, and more postoperative hemoglobin decrease ［16.5 (15.0,23.0) g/L vs. 6.5 (1.5,13.0) g/L, Z=-4.894, P=0.000］ as compared to the FURL group. There were no significant differences in shortterm and longterm stone clearance rates between the two groups ［91.7% (33/36) vs. 94.4% (34/36), χ2=0.215, P=0.643; 97.2% (35/36) vs. 972% (35/36), χ2=0.000, P=1.000］. There were no significant differences in renal function, postoperative fever, and infection between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsFor 2-4 cm renal stones with CT value ≤1200 HU, FURL and mPCNL have the same surgical effect. FURL is recommended for its less intraoperative bleeding, less trauma, shorter postoperative recovery time, and shorter hospital stay.

参考文献/References:

[1]米华,邓耀良.中国尿石症的流行病学特征.中华泌尿外科杂志,2003,24(10):66-67.
[2]黄健,郭应禄,那彦群,等主编.中国泌尿外科和男科疾病诊断治疗指南(2019版).北京：北京科学出版社,2020.424.
[3]De La Rosette J, Assimos D, Desa IM, et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol,2011,25(1):11-17.
[4]陈立杰,吕学锋,郭强,等.微通道经皮肾镜取石术与标准通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石的荟萃分析.现代泌尿外科杂志,2019,24(10):837-842,846.
[5]Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, et al. Grey zones in urolithiasis guidelines. Eur Urol Focus,2017,3(1):144-146.
[6]Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Int J Urol,2012,19(3):264-267.
[7]Aboumarzouk OM, Somani B, Mnoga M. Safety and efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for stone disease in obese patients: a systematic review of the literature. BJU Int,2012,110(8 Pt B):E374-E380.
[8]徐磊,陈弋生,陶凌松,等.单通道半无管化微创经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗高CT值顽固性肾结石的比较.中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(8):708-712.
[9]张东兴,沈洪亮,刘文辉,等.≤3cm肾结石行输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术的疗效与安全性评估.现代泌尿外科杂志,2021,26(8):664-667.
[10]王进峰,吴志坚,刘鑫国,等.泌尿系结石CT值与其硬度值的关系.实用医学杂志,2008,24(3):365-366.
[11]Gok A, Polat H, Cift A, et al. The hounsfield unit value calculated with the aid of noncontrast computed tomography and its effect on the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis,2015,43(3):277-281.
[12]刘百川,张福霖,钟瑞伦,等.MPCNL与FURL治疗肾实质厚度>2.5cm的2～3cm肾结石的疗效对比.临床泌尿外科杂志,2018,33(7):537-541.
[13]Bai Y, Tang Y, Deng L, et al. Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Urol,2017,17(1):75.
[14]Bryniarski P, Paradysz A, Zyczkowski M, et al. A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter. J Endourol,2012,26(1):52-57.
[15]廖欢,陈瑶,唐园,等.经皮肾镜碎石术与输尿管软镜碎石术治疗直径10～20mm肾下盏结石的疗效分析.现代泌尿外科杂志,2016,21(5):342-345.
[16]王飞,张宇, 陈乐仲,等.微通道经皮肾镜与逆行输尿管软镜碎石治疗对2～4cm肾结石患者血清炎性因子的影响.实用医学杂志,2018,34(16):2716-2721.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：吉林省科学技术厅资助项目（20200201445JC）**通讯作者,Email：lihy99@jlu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-11-08