[1]谢程 支运来 孙方浒** 耿申 吉振帅 张鹏 程蔡 成宽.目标性后腹腔镜与常规后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2023,01(8):571-575.
　Xie Cheng,Zhi Yunlai,Sun Fanghu,et al.Clinical Comparison of Goaloriented Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2023,01(8):571-575.
点击复制

目标性后腹腔镜与常规后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2023年8期
页码:
571-575
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Comparison of Goaloriented Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy
作者:
谢程 支运来 孙方浒** 耿申 吉振帅 张鹏 程蔡 成宽
(徐州医科大学附属连云港医院连云港市第一人民医院泌尿外科，连云港222061)
Author(s):
Xie Cheng;  Zhi Yunlai;  Sun Fanghu;  et al.
Department of Urology, First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang; Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang 222061, China
关键词:
肾上腺切除术; 后腹腔镜手术
Keywords:
Adrenalectomy; Retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的目标性后腹腔镜与常规后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的临床效果。方法回顾性分析我院2015年7月~2022年12月手术治疗135例肾上腺良性肿瘤的临床资料，其中目标性后腹腔肾上腺切除术65例(目标组)，常规后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术70例(常规组)，比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、术后引流量、术后引流时间、术后住院时间、术后疼痛语言等级评定量表（Verbal Rating Scale,VRS)。结果2组手术均顺利完成，无中转开放手术。目标组术中出血量［(29.4±16.6)ml vs.(40.1±174)ml，t=-3.653，P=0.000 ］、手术切口长度［(2.7±1.0)cm vs.(3.5±0.6)cm，t=-5.323，P=0000 ］、术后引流量［(34.2±18.4)ml vs.(42.1±18.7)ml，t=-2.494，P=0.014 ］、术后疼痛VRS评分［(1.9±0.7)分 vs.(2.2±0.7)分，t=-2.748，P=0006］和术后住院时间［(4.5±0.9)d vs.(5.0±1.1)d，t=-3.257，P=0.001］显著优于常规组，手术时间明显长于常规组［(56.4±22.0)min vs.(48.1±15.4)min，t=2.509,P=0.012］。135例术后随访3~19个月，平均11个月，无复发和并发症。结论目标性后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术安全有效，术中出血量、术后疼痛评分，术后住院时间优于常规后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术，但手术时间较长，有待技术及器械的改进。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcomes of goaloriented retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus conventional retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy.MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on clinical data of 135 patients with benign adrenal tumors treated surgically in our hospital from July 2015 to December 2022, including 65 cases of goaloriented retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (goaloriented group) and 70 cases of conventional retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (conventional group). All the surgeries were performed by the same operator. The clinical data such as operative time, intraoperative bleeding, incision length, postoperative drainage, postoperative drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative pain verbal rating scale (VRS) were statistically analyzed in both groups.ResultsThe surgery was completed in both groups without conversion to open surgery. In terms of intraoperative bleeding ［(29.4±16.6) ml vs. (40.1±1740) ml, t=-3.653, P=0000］, surgical incision length ［(2.7±1.0) cm vs. (3.5±0.6) cm, t=-5.323, P=0.000］, postoperative drainage ［(34.2±18.4) ml vs. (42.1±18.7) ml, t=-2.494, P=0.014］, postoperative pain VRS ［(1.9±0.7) points vs. (2.2±0.7) points, t=-2.748, P=0.006］ and postoperative hospital stay ［(4.5±0.9) d vs. (5.0±1.1) d, t=-3.257, P=0001］, the goaloriented group was superior to the conventional group, with differences being statistically significant. However, the operative time was longer in the goaloriented group than that in the conventional group ［(56.4±22.0) min vs. (48.1±15.4) min, t=2509, P=0012］. Postoperative followups ranged for 3-19 months with a mean of 11 months, with no recurrence or complications.ConclusionsGoaloriented retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy is safe and effective, which is superior to the conventional surgery in terms of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain scores, and postoperative hospital stay. However, the operative time was longer, requiring improvement of techniques and instruments.

参考文献/References:

[1]Smith CD, Weber CJ, Amerson JR. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: new gold standard. World J Surg,1999,23(4):389-396.
[2]孙方浒,吉振帅,谢程,等.目标性后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的设计及临床应用.中华医学杂志,2020,200(14):1087-1090.
[3]孙方浒,张文刚,朱汝健,等.直接穿刺法建立腹膜后腔的技术改进及临床应用.中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(10):901-902.
[4]梅骅,陈凌武,高新,主编.泌尿外科手术学.第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.869-872.
[5]Conzo G, Tartaglia E, Gambardella C, et al. Minimally invasive approach for adrenal lesions: systematic review of laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and assessment of risk factors for complications. Int J Surg,2016,28(Suppl 1):S118-S123.
[6]Bakkar S, Materazzi G, Fregoli L, et al. Posterior retroperitonoscopic adrenalectomy; a back door access with an unusually rapid learning curve. Updates Surg,2017,69(2):235-239.
[7]Wang Y, He Y, Li BS, et al. Laparoendoscopic singlesite retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy versus conventional retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in obese patients. J Endourol,2016,30(3);306-311.
[8]孙方浒,傅斌,柯莽,等.半侧卧位后腹腔镜下肾上腺手术体会.中华泌尿外科杂志,2011,32(8):409-511.
[9]Mirilas P, Skandalakis JE. Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneal spaces part Ⅱ: the architecture of the retroperitoneal space. Am Surg,2010,76(1):33-42.
[10]Machado MT, NunesSilva I, da Costa EF, et al. Laparoendoscopic singlesite retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: bilateral stepbystep technique. Surg Endosc, 2017,31:3351-3352.
[11]Rane A, Kommu S, Eddy B, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel laparoscopic port(RPort) in urology and evolution of the single laparoscopic port procedure(SLIPP). J Endourol,2007,21:A22-A23.
[12]Desai MM, Rao PP, Aron M, et al. Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int,2008,101(1):83-88.
[13]张旭,马鑫,李宏召,等.单孔后腹腔镜解剖性肾上腺切除术5例报告.临床泌尿外科杂志,2009,24(9):647-650.
[14]孙方浒,傅斌,洪涛,等.单孔单通道后腹腔镜下肾囊肿去顶术的疗效分析.中华泌尿外科杂志,2013,34(9):662-665.
[15]Tsai YC, Chen CH, Hu YH, et al. Factors affecting operative efficiency and postoperative convalescence in laparoendoscopic singlesite (LESS) adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc,2018,32(3):1449-1455.（收稿日期：2023-02-24）

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：连云港市国家创新型城市建设(社会发展)项目(SH1405)**通讯作者，Email：fhust@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-11-08