[1]刘兵兵 任志楠 张盼可 镐英杰**.经皮内镜与微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗单节段退行性腰椎管狭窄的疗效对比[J].中国微创外科杂志,2022,01(7):553-558.
　Liu Bingbing,Ren Zhinan,Zhang Panke,et al.Comparison of Efficacy of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2022,01(7):553-558.
点击复制

经皮内镜与微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗单节段退行性腰椎管狭窄的疗效对比()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2022年7期
页码:
553-558
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-10-09

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Efficacy of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
作者:
刘兵兵 任志楠 张盼可 镐英杰**
(郑州大学第一附属医院骨科，郑州450052)
Author(s):
Liu Bingbing;  Ren Zhinan;  Zhang Panke;  et al.
Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
关键词:
腰椎管狭窄症; 经皮内镜; 微创手术; 经椎间孔腰椎间融合术
Keywords:
Lumbar spinal stenosis; Percutaneous endoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的对比经皮内镜经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion，PETLIF)和微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion，MISTLIF)治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效。方法回顾性分析2019年1月~2020年6月因单节段退行性腰椎管狭窄症行微创腰椎减压融合手术47例资料，依患者意愿选择手术方式，PETLIF组21例，MISTLIF组26例。比较2组手术指标，术后3天、3个月、6个月、12个月腰腿痛视觉模拟评分(Visual Analogue Scale，VAS)，术后3、6、12个月Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry Disability Index，ODI)，术后12个月椎间融合情况，末次随访改良MacNab标准评价疗效。结果PETLIF组术中出血量、术后引流量较MISTLIF组明显减少［(91.8±13.6)ml vs. (115.2±16.1)ml，t=-5.311，P=0.000；(49.6±11.5)ml vs. (99.6±30.5)ml，t=-7.698，P=0.000］，但手术时间长［(150.9±12.4)min vs. (101.0±9.9)min，t=15.321，P=0.000］。2组术后腰腿痛VAS评分及ODI较术前均明显下降(P=0.000)，2组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后12个月2组均达到骨性融合。2组术后并发症和优良率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论微创手术PETLIF和MISTLIF治疗单节段退行性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效相当，同样安全、有效，PETLIF具有术中视野清晰、术中出血量少、术后早期腰痛程度轻的特点。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PETLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MISTLIF) in the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.MethodsClinical data of 47 patients with singlesegment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis diseases who underwent lumbar decompression fusion surgery from January 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the patients’ wishes, they were divided into the PETLIF group (21 cases) and the MISTLIF group (26 cases). The outcomes of the two groups were compared, including surgical indexes, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of lumbar and leg pain at 3 days, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, intervertebral fusion at 12 months after surgery, and the efficacy of modified MacNab criteria at the last followup.ResultsCompared with the MISTLIF group, the PETLIF group had less blood loss ［(91.8±13.6) ml vs. (115.2±16.1) ml, t=-5.311, P=0.000］ and drainage volume ［(49.6±11.5) ml vs. (99.6±30.5) ml, t=-7.698, P=0.000］, but longer operation time ［(150.9±12.4) min vs. (101.0±9.9) min, t=15.321, P=0.000］. The VAS score of lumbar and leg pain and ODI in both groups were significantly lower after surgery than preoperation (all P=0.000), and there were no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). Bone fusion was achieved in both groups at 12 months after surgery. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications and excellent and good rates between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsThe minimally invasive surgery of PETLIF and MISTLIF have comparable efficacy for singlesegment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, which are also safe and effective. PETLIF has the characteristics of clear intraoperative vision, less intraoperative bleeding, and mild degree of early postoperative low back pain.

参考文献/References:

[1]Binder DK,Schmidt MH,Weinstein PR.Lumbar spinal stenosis.Semin Neurol,2002,22(2):157-166.
[2]Forsth P,Olafsson G,Carlsson T,et al.A randomized,controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.N Engl J Med,2016,374(15):1413-1423.
[3]Deyo RA,Mirza SK,Martin BI,et al.Trends,major medical complications,and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults.JAMA,2010,303(13):1259-1265.
[4]Resnick DK,Choudhri TF,Dailey AT,et al.Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.Part 17:bone growth stimulators and lumbar fusion.J Neurosurg Spine,2005,2(6):737-740.
[5]腰椎管狭窄症手术治疗规范中国专家共识组.腰椎管狭窄症手术治疗规范中国专家共识(2014年).中华医学杂志,2014,94(35):2724-2725.
[6]Farrokhi MR,Yadollahikhales G,Gholami M,et al.Clinical outcomes of posterolateral fusion vs.posterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative instability.Pain Physician,2018,21(4):383-406.
[7]王中华,刘林.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术中融合器的应用进展.中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(7):639-643.
[8]Zhao Y,Zhu Y,Zhang H,et al.Comparison of bilateral versus unilateral decompression incision of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in twolevel degenerative lumbar diseases.Int Orthop,2018,42(12):2835-2842.
[9]Kim JS,Jung B,Lee SH.Instrumented minimally invasive spinaltransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MISTLIF):minimum 5year followup with clinical and radiologic outcomes.Clin Spine Surg,2018,31(6):E302-E309.
[10]Ahn Y,Oh HK,Kim H,et al.Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy:an advanced surgical technique and clinical outcomes.Neurosurgery,2014,75(2):124-133.
[11]杨晋才,海涌,丁一,等.经皮内镜辅助下经椎间孔腰椎减压融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症.中华医学杂志,2018,98(45):3711-3715.
[12]Bridwell KH,Lenke LG,McEnery KW,et al.Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine.Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects?Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1995,20(12):1410-1418.
[13]王长昇,林建华,许卫红,等.脊柱微创通道镜系统辅助改良经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病.中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(4):340-343.
[14]Ge DH,Stekas ND,Varlotta CG,et al.comparative analysis of two transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques:open TLIF versus wiltse MIS TLIF.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2019,44(9):E555-E560.
[15]刘超,王建,张正丰,等.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合治疗腰椎退变性疾病的中远期疗效分析.中华骨科杂志,2018,38(20):1266-1272.
[16]Regev GJ,Lee YP,Taylor WR,et al.Nerve injury to the posterior rami medial branch during the insertion of pedicle screws:comparison of miniopen versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion techniques.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2009,34(11):1239-1242.
[17]Yamashita K,Higashino K,Sakai T,et al.Revision percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy under the local anesthesia for the recurrent lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus in a high class athlete:a case report.J Med Invest,2016,63(1-2):135-139.
[18]陈路,吴添龙,何丁文,等.内镜下椎间融合联合经皮椎弓根钉内固定治疗退行性腰椎滑脱合并腰椎管狭窄的疗效.骨科,2020,11(6):518-522.
[19]杨国志,张桂萍,李雷,等.经皮内窥镜下经椎间孔入路腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症.脊柱外科杂志,2021,19(5):313-317.
[20]Heo DH,Park CK.Clinical results of percutaneous biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion with application of enhanced recovery after surgery.Neurosurg Focus,2019,46(4):E18.
[21]Chang CC,Chou D,Pennicooke B,et al.Longterm radiographic outcomes of expandable versus static cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.J Neurosurg Spine,2020 Nov 13.Online ahead of print.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：河南省医学科技攻关计划项目(LHGJ20190292)**通讯作者，Email：haojack77@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-10-09