[1]田霖 胡鹏** 宁华秀 耿晓鹏 张汉立 王光林 孙兆忠 张民 李宏达 芦怀旺 谭芳.数字3D技术辅助经皮椎间孔镜椎间盘切除术治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄[J].中国微创外科杂志,2022,01(7):545-552.
　Tian Lin,Hu Peng,Ning Huaxiu,et al.3D Digital Technique Assisted Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2022,01(7):545-552.
点击复制

数字3D技术辅助经皮椎间孔镜椎间盘切除术治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2022年7期
页码:
545-552
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-10-09

文章信息/Info

Title:
3D Digital Technique Assisted Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
作者:
田霖 胡鹏** 宁华秀 耿晓鹏 张汉立 王光林 孙兆忠 张民 李宏达 芦怀旺 谭芳
(滨州医学院附属医院脊柱外科，滨州256603)
Author(s):
Tian Lin;  Hu Peng;  Ning Huaxiu;  et al.
Department of Spine Surgery, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou 256603, China
关键词:
数字化三维重建; 经皮椎间孔镜椎间盘切除术; 退行性腰椎管狭窄
Keywords:
Digital threedimensional reconstruction; Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy; Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的比较数字3D技术辅助经皮椎间孔镜椎间盘切除术(percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy，PTED)与传统PTED治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄(degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis，DLSS)的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2016年4月～2019年10月我科114例PTED的临床资料，采用3D技术辅助PTED 55例(观察组)，传统PTED 59例(对照组)，比较2组建立通道时间、神经根减压时间、术中出血量、并发症，术前、术后3个月、6个月、末次随访下肢痛视觉模拟评分(Visual Analogue Scale，VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry Disability Index，ODI)以及末次随访疗效(改良MacNab标准)。结果2组均顺利完成手术，观察组建立通道时间(10.5±2.5)min，明显短于对照组(12.8±3.5)min(t=-4.018，P=0.000)。观察组神经根减压时间(44.5±9.8)min，对照组(45.0±8.5)min，2组比较无统计学差异(t=-0.256，P=0798)。观察组术中出血量(15.1±3.0)ml，对照组(14.4±2.6)ml，2组比较无统计学差异(t=1.306，P=0.194)。对照组1例行走根损伤，1例术后切口红肿。观察组随访(13.9±3.6)月，对照组(14.6±1.8)月，2组比较差异无显著性（t=-1.370,P=0171）。2组术后3个月、6个月、末次随访VAS评分及ODI均较术前明显改善(均P=0.000)，2组间差异无统计学意义(F=0.234,P=0.630;F=0.295，P=0.588)。末次随访2组改良MacNab标准优良率差异无统计学意义［96.4%(53/55)vs.94.9%(56/59)， χ2=0.142，P=0.706］。结论数字3D技术辅助PTED与传统PTED治疗DLSS安全、有效，数字3D技术辅助PTED可优化手术操作，缩短手术时间。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare clinical effects of 3D digital technique assisted percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and traditional PTED in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.MethodsClinical effects of 114 PTED cases from April 2016 to October 2019, including 55 cases of 3D digital technique assisted PTED (observation group) and 59 cases of traditional PTED (control group), were analyzed. The time of channel establishment, decompression time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, visual analogue scale (VAS) of lower limb pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) before surgery, 3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, and at the last followup, and efficacy at the last followup (modified MacNab criteria) were taken as main indicators of clinical effects.ResultsThe operations were successfully completed in both groups. The channel establishment time in the observation group was (10.5±2.5) min, which was significantly shorter than that in the control group (128±3.5) min (t=-4.018, P=0.000). The nerve root decompression time of observation group and control group were (44.5±9.8) min and (45.0±8.5) min, respectively, which showed no significant difference (t=-0.256, P=0.798). The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group (15.1±3.0) ml and the control group (14.4±2.6) ml was close (t=1.306, P=0.194). There were 1 case of walking root injury and 1 case of incision infection in the control group. The observation group was followed up for (13.9±3.6) months, and the control group was followed up for (14.6±1.8) months,which showed no significant difference (t=-1.370,P=0.171). The VAS score and ODI of the two groups were significantly improved in the 3 months, 6 months and at the last followup as compared with those before operation (all P=0.000), and there were no statistical differences between the two groups (F=0.234,P=0.630;F=0.295,P=0.588). At the last followup, there was no significant difference in the excellent and good rates between the two groups［96.4%(53/55) vs. 94.9%(50/59), χ2=0.142,P=0.706］.ConclusionsBoth 3D digital technique assisted PTED and traditional PTED are safe and effective surgical methods for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. 3D digital technique can shorten the surgical time and optimize the surgical process.

参考文献/References:

[1]周逸驰,金祺,常见忠,等.改良TESSYS技术治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症.中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(9):793-797.
[2]Chiu JC. Evolving transforaminal endoscopic microdecompression for herniated lumbar discs and spinal stenosis. Surg Technol Int,2004,13(2):276-286.
[3]Lewandrowski KU. “Outsidein” technique, clinical results, and indications with transforaminal lumbar endoscopic surgery: a retrospective study on 220 patients on applied radiographic classification of foraminal spinal stenosis. Int J Spine Surg,2014,8(5):1-17.
[4]Kim HS, Paudel B, Jang JS, et al. Percutaneous full endoscopic bilateral lumbar decompression of spinal stenosis through uniportalcontralateral approach: techniques and preliminary results. World Neurosurg,2017,103(4):201-209.
[5]Ahn Y. Percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Expert Rev Med Devices,2014,11(6):605-616.
[6]Cinotti G, De SP, Nofroni I, et al. Stenosis of lumbar intervertebral foramen: anatomic study on predisposing factors. Spine,2002,27(3):223-229.
[7]Kaneko Y, Matsumoto M, Hironari T, et al. Morphometric analysis of the lumbar intervertebral foramen in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis by multidetectorrow computed tomography. Eur Spine J,2012,21(12):2594-2602.
[8]Shin JK, Youn MS, Seong YJ, et al. Iatrogenic dural tear in endoscopic lumbar spinal surgery: full endoscopic dural suture repair (Youn’s technique). Eur Spine J,2018,27(3):544-548.
[9]NubukpoGuménu AA, Ségbédji FKK, Rué M, et al. Endospinesurgery complications in lumbar herniated disc. World Neurosurg,2018,119:e78-e79.
[10]Splendiani A, Ferrari F, Barile A, et al. Occult neural foraminal stenosis caused by association between disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis: demonstration with dedicated upright MRI system. La radiologia medica,2014,119(3):164-174.
[11]Liu C, Zhou Y. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for recurrent lumbar disk herniation. World Neurosurg,2017,98(35):14-20.
[12]Gibson JNA, Subramanian AS, Scott CEH. A randomised controlled trial of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy vs microdiscectomy. Eur Spine J,2017,26(3):847-856.
[13]ZhiLi Z, Rui Z, YangChun W, et al. Effect of graded facetectomy on lumbar biomechanics. J Healthc Eng,2017,23(4):1-6.
[14]Hoogland T, Schubert M, Miklitz B, et al. Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a lowdose chymopapain: a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases. Spine,2006,31(24):890-897.
[15]Xin G, ShiSheng H, HaiLong Z. Morphometric analysis of the YESS and TESSYS techniques of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Clin Anat,2013,26(6):728-734.
[16]Fan G, Guan X, Sun Q, et al. Puncture reduction in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy with HE’s lumbar location (HELLO) System: A cadaver study. PloS One,2015,10(12):e0144939.
[17]Guan X, Gu X, Zhang L, et al. Morphometric analysis of the working zone for posterolateral endoscopic lumbar discectomy based on magnetic resonance neurography. J Spinal Disord Tech,2015,28(2):78-84.
[18]Hasegawa T, An HS, Haughton VM, et al. Lumbar foraminal stenosis: critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina. A cryomicrotome study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995,77(1):32-38.
[19]Gellhorn AC, Katz JN, Suri P. Osteoarthritis of the spine: the facet joints. Nat Rev Rheumatol,2013,9(4):216-224.
[20]MartelPelletier J, Boileau C, Pelletier JP, et al. Cartilage in normal and osteoarthritis conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol,2008,22(2):351-384.
[21]Gopinath P. Lumbar segmental instability: points to ponder. J Orthopaedic,2015,12(4):165-167.
[22]Fujiwara A, Tamai K, An HS, et al. The relationship between disc degeneration, facet joint osteoarthritis, and stability of the degenerative lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord,2000,13(5):444-450.
[23]宋启春,李全义,郭晓昀,等.“无视髂嵴”经皮椎间孔脊柱内镜系统技术治疗L5～S1腰椎间盘突出症.中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(5):599-603.
[24]Lee CK, Rauschning W, Glenn W. Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: classification, pathologic anatomy and surgical decompression. Spine,1988,13(3):313-320.
[25]Wang Y, Dou Q, Yang J, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression for lumbar lateral spinal canal stenosis: classification of lateral region of lumbar spinal canal and surgical approaches. World Neurosurg,2018,119:e276-e283.
[26]Jiageng C, Xiyue J, Changping L, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5S1lumbar disc herniation using a transforaminal approach versus an interlaminar approach: a systematic review and metaanalysis. World Neurosurg,2018,116(15):412-420.
[27]Li ZZ, Hou SX, Shang WL, et al. The strategy and early clinical outcome of fullendoscopic L5/S1 discectomy through interlaminar approach. Clin Neurol Neurosurg,2015,133(15):40-45.
[28]Xu Z, Liu Y, Chen J.Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for L5/S1 adolescent lumbar disc herniation. Turk Neurosurg,2018,28(6):923-928.
[29]Choi KC, Kim JS, Ryu KS, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation: transforaminal versus interlaminar approach. Pain Physician,2013,16(6):547-556.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目（2017WS752）；山东省中医药科技发展计划项目（2019-0498）**通讯作者，Email:qyhupeng@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-10-09