[1]邢建强 冯晴 刘栋 刘彬 邵滨*.经对侧椎间孔入路内镜治疗L5/S1近端游离型腰椎间盘突出症[J].中国微创外科杂志,2021,01(2):126-129.
　Xing Jianqiang,Feng Qing,Liu Dong,et al.Endoscopic Treatment of L5/S1 Proximal Sequestered Lumbar Disc Herniation Through Contralateral Intervertebral Foramen Approach[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2021,01(2):126-129.
点击复制

经对侧椎间孔入路内镜治疗L5/S1近端游离型腰椎间盘突出症()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2021年2期
页码:
126-129
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Endoscopic Treatment of L5/S1 Proximal Sequestered Lumbar Disc Herniation Through Contralateral Intervertebral Foramen Approach
作者:
邢建强 冯晴 刘栋 刘彬 邵滨*
（滨州医学院附属医院脊柱外科，滨州256603）
Author(s):
Xing Jianqiang;  Feng Qing;  Liu Dong;  et al.
Department of Spinal Surgery, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou 256603, China
关键词:
游离型腰椎间盘突出症; 椎间孔; 对侧椎间孔入路
Keywords:
Sequestered lumbar disc herniation; Intervertebral foramen; Contralateral intervertebral foramen approach
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨经对侧椎间孔入路内镜下治疗L5/S1高度近端游离型腰椎间盘突出症（sequestered lumbar disc herniation，SLDH）的安全性及疗效。方法2015年1月~2019年1月我院采用经对侧椎间孔入路内镜下治疗L5/S1高度近端SLDH 46例,患侧卧位，定位L4/5椎间隙,棘突中线旁开10~12 cm健侧作为进针点，建立工作通道至Ⅰ区，内镜下取出游离髓核组织。比较手术前后腰、腿痛视觉模拟评分（Visual Analogue Scale,VAS)和Oswestry 功能障碍指数（Oswestry Disability Index，ODI），采用改良MacNab标准评价疗效，观察术后1年复发率。结果术后1周腰、腿痛VAS评分分别为（2.5±04）、（3.0±0.4）分，术后1年分别为（1.6±03）、（1.9±0.3）分，与术前（5.8±0.5）、（7.1±0.6）分比较明显改善（均P=0000）；ODI术后1周、1年分别为（22.6±41）%、（9.8±2.8）%，与术前（69.2±1.6）%比较差异有统计学意义（均P=0000）。改良MacNab评定标准评价疗效，术后1周、1年优良率分别为89.1%（41/46）、93.5%(43/46)。术后1年随访复发率2.2％(1/46)。结论经对侧椎间孔入路内镜下治疗L5/S1高度近端游离型腰椎间盘突出症近期临床疗效良好。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment of L5/S1 high proximal sequestered lumbar disc herniation (SLDH) through the contralateral intervertebral foramen approach.MethodsFrom January 2015 to January 2019, 46 cases of L5/S1 high proximal SLDH were given endoscopic treatment through the contralateral intervertebral foramen approach. The patient was placed in the lateral lying position, and the L4/5 intervertebral space was located. The healthy side of the midline of spinous process was opened 10-12 cm apart as the insertion point, and the working channel was established to the Area Ⅰ. The free nucleus pulposus tissue was removed under the endoscope. The Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) of lumbago and leg pain were compared before and after operation. Efficacy was evaluated by improved MacNab standard, and recurrence rate was observed a year after operation. ResultsThe VAS scores for lumbago and leg pain a week after surgery were (25±0.4) and (3.0±0.4) points, respectively; the VAS scores for lumbago and leg pain a year after surgery were (1.6±0.3) and (1.9±0.3) points, respectively, which were significantly improved compared with those before surgery (all P=0.000). The ODI a week and a year after operation were (22.6±4.1)% and (9.8±2.8)%, respectively, with statistically significant difference from the preoperative comparison ［(69.2±1.6)%, all P=0.000］. The improved MacNab standard was used to evaluate the efficacy, and the excellent and good rates were 89.1% (41/46) and 93.5% (43/46) at a week and a year after the operation, respectively. The recurrence rate was 2.2%(1/46) after a year followup.ConclusionEndoscopic treatment of L5/S1 high proximal SLDH through the contralateral intervertebral foramen approach has good shortterm efficacy.

参考文献/References:

[1]段丽群,张文志,贺瑞,等.经皮椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术治疗脱垂移位型腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效.中国矫形外科杂志, 2016,24(15):1368-1374.
[2]Le H, Sandhu FA, Fessler RG. Clinical outcomes after minimalaccess surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus,2003,15(3):E12.
[3]尹东,韦绍仁,白崇恩.CT诊断游离型腰椎间盘突出症的探讨.中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2000,10(1):34-35.
[4]应明.突出腰椎间盘的再吸收.中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1998,8(3):163-165.
[5]左文山,王先泉,高聿同.全椎板整块切除原位回植法治疗游离型腰椎间盘突出症.临床骨科杂志,2005,8(4):318-319.
[6]聂治军,张文芳,张银刚,等.经皮椎间孔镜下TESSYS技术治疗腰椎间盘突出的近期疗效观察.临床骨科杂志,2018,21(2):153-156.
[7]Liu C, Chu L, Yong HC, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for highly migrated lumbar disc herniation. Pain Physician,2017,20(1):E75-E84.
[8]Wu J, Zhang C, Zheng W, et al. Analysis of the characteristics and clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation. World Neurosurg，2016,92(4):142-147.
[9]Hurday Y, Xu BS, Guo L, et al. Radiographic measurement for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic approach (PELD). Eur Spine J,2017,26 (3):635-645.
[10]Choi G, Modi HN, Prada N, et al. Clinical results of XMRassisted percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Orthop Surg Res,2013,8(14):8-14.
[11]焦伟,张伟,尹稳,等.水平入路经皮椎间孔镜治疗近端脱垂游离型腰椎间盘突出症.临床骨科杂志,2019,22(3):266-273.
[12]Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, et al. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after conventional discectomy: a prospective，randomized study comparing full endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal versus microsurgical revision. J Spinal Disord Tech,2009,22(2):122-129.
[13]Choi KC，Lee DC，Shim HK，et al. A strategy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for migrated disc herniation. World Neurosurg,2017,99(3):259-266.
[14]王大巍,邵滨,邢建强,等.椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症2年以上随访的疗效.中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(4):326-329.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email:1044001519@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-05-11