[1]侯国进 周方** 田耘 姬洪全 张志山 郭琰 吕扬 杨钟玮.有限切开结合经皮微创接骨板内固定技术治疗胫骨远端骨折[J].中国微创外科杂志,2021,01(2):121-125.
　Hou Guojin,Zhou Fang,Tian Yun,et al.Limited Open Reduction Combined With Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis in Management of Distal Tibia Fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2021,01(2):121-125.
点击复制

有限切开结合经皮微创接骨板内固定技术治疗胫骨远端骨折()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2021年2期
页码:
121-125
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Limited Open Reduction Combined With Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis in Management of Distal Tibia Fractures
作者:
侯国进 周方** 田耘 姬洪全 张志山 郭琰 吕扬 杨钟玮
（北京大学第三医院骨科，北京100191）
Author(s):
Hou Guojin;  Zhou Fang;  Tian Yun;  et al.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
关键词:
胫骨远端骨折; 经皮微创接骨板内固定技术; 有限切开; 腓骨骨折
Keywords:
Distal tibial fracture; Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis; Limited open reduction; Fibula fracture
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的比较经皮微创接骨板内固定技术（minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis，MIPPO）与有限切开结合MIPPO技术治疗胫骨远端1/3关节外骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年1月~2018年12月我院胫骨远端关节外骨折77例，MIPPO组25例，有限切开结合MIPPO组52例，随访1年以上。比较2组术中透视次数、术后正位踝穴角、无痛负重时间、骨折愈合时间、末次随访时踝关节屈伸活动度、美国足踝外科协会（American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society，AOFAS）评分及并发症。结果MIPPO组较有限切开结合MIPPO组术中透视次数平均增加约2次［（10.5±2.4）次 vs. （8.7±2.5）次，t=2.845，P=0.006］。随访时间（20.3±6.6）月。2组各1例局部蜂窝组织炎（P=0.547）。MIPPO组1例内固定断裂术后1个月行翻修手术（P=0.325）。2组正位踝穴角、无痛负重时间、骨折影像学愈合时间、末次随访时踝关节屈伸活动度及AOFAS评分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论有限切开复位能直视确保复位质量，且不增加切口相关并发症，同时减少医患放射线暴露，是治疗胫骨远端1/3关节外骨折的安全、有效方法。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical and radiological results between minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) and limited open reduction combined with MIPPO in the treatment of distal 1/3 tibial extraarticular fracture.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 77 cases of distal tibial extraarticular fractures treated in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018. There were 25 cases treated with MIPPO and 52 cases treated with limited open reduction combined with MIPPO. All the patients were followed up for more than 1 year. The times of intraoperative fluoroscopy, angle of ankle, painless weight bearing time, fracture union time, flexion and extension of ankle joint and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score at the last followup and complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsCompared with the limited open reduction combined with MIPPO group, the times of intraoperative fluoroscopy in the MIPPO group was increased by about 2 times on average, with difference being statistically significant ［(10.5±2.4) vs. (8.7±2.5) times, t=2.845, P=0.006］. All the 77 patients were followed up for at least one year, with an average of （20.3±6.6） months. One patient in each group had local cellulitis (P=0.547), which was improved and well controlled by intravenous antibiotics and local dressing change. In the MIPPO group, one patient underwent revision surgery 1 month postoperation because of the failure of internal fixation due to early weightbearing (P=0325). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the angle of ankle, painless weightbearing time, fracture union time, ankle flexion and extension activity and AOFAS score at the last followup (P>0.05).Conclusion Limited open reduction combined with MIPPO can ensure the quality of reduction and reduce the radiation exposure of patients and doctors. It is a safe and effective method for the treatment of the distal 1/3 tibial extraarticular fractures.

参考文献/References:

[1]Larsen P,Elsoe R,Hansen SH,et al.Incidence and epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures.Injury,2015,46(4):746-750.
[2]Kim JW,Kim H,Oh CW,et al.A prospective randomized study on operative treatment for simple distal tibial fractures:minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus minimal open reduction and internal fixation.J Orthop Trauma,2018,32(1):e19-e24.
[3]Krettek C,Schandelmaier P,Miclau T,et al.Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) using the DCS in proximal and distal femoral fractures.Injury,1997,28(1):20-30
[4]Bingo I,Yalcin N,Bicici V,et al.Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis does not increase complication rates in extraarticular distal tibial fractures.Open Orthop J,2015,9(1):73-77.
[5]Lai TC,Fleming JJ.Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal tibia fractures.Clin Podiatr Med Surg,2018,35(2):223-232.
[6]Zou J，Zhang W，Zhang CQ.Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis with open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of extraarticular distal tibia fractures.Injury,2013,44(8):1102-1106.
[7]Kitaoka HB，Alexander IJ，Adelaar RS，et al．Clinical rating systems for the anklehindfoot,midfoot,hallux,and lesser toes．Foot Ankle Int,1994,15(7):349-353.
[8]张志山,周方,姬洪全,等.微创经皮钢板骨桥接术联合锁定加压钛板治疗胫骨远端骨折.中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(11):1090-1092.
[9]Mardian S,Schmolz W,Schaser KD,et al.Interfragmentary lag screw fixation in locking plate constructs increases stiffness in simple fracture patterns.Clin Biomech,2015,30(8):814-819.
[10]Vidovi D,Mateji A,Ivica M,et al.Minimallyinvasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibial fractures:results and complications.Injury,2015,46(Suppl 6):S96-99.
[11]周凯华,罗从风,陈农,等.锁定和非锁定中和钢板结合MIPPO技术治疗A型胫骨远端骨折的比较分析.中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2015,30(10):1068-1071.
[12]Hazarika S, Chakravarthy J, Cooper J. Minimally invasive locking plate osteosynthesis for fractures of the distal tibia:results in 20 patients. Injury,2006,37(9):877-887.
[13]Strauss EJ,Alfonso D,Kummer FJ,et al.The effect of concurrent fibular fracture on the fixation of distal tibia fractures:a laboratory comparison of intramedullary nails with locked plates.J Orthop Trauma,2007,21(3):172-177.
[14]Hasenboehler E,Rikli D,Babst R.Locking compression plate with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in diaphyseal and distal tibial fracture:a retrospective study of 32 patients.Injury,2007,38(3):365-370.
[15]Sah S,Bikash KC,Dangi SJ,et al.Limited open reduction and percutaneous plate osteosynthesis:alternative option to minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in management of distal tibia fractures.J Nepal Med Assoc,2017,56(208):456-460.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：北京大学第三医院临床重点项目（BYSY2017014）**通讯作者，Email：zhouf@bjmu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-05-11