[1]李栋 周维波 朱春晖 吴昊*.桥接组合式内固定系统和锁定钢板系统治疗股骨干骨折的疗效比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,01(9):807-811.
　Li Dong,Zhou Weibo,Zhu Chunhui,et al.Therapeutic Effects of Bridgelink Combined Fixation System and Locking Plate System for Femoral Shaft Fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2020,01(9):807-811.
点击复制

桥接组合式内固定系统和锁定钢板系统治疗股骨干骨折的疗效比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2020年9期
页码:
807-811
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Therapeutic Effects of Bridgelink Combined Fixation System and Locking Plate System for Femoral Shaft Fractures
作者:
李栋 周维波 朱春晖 吴昊*
（南京医科大学附属常州市第二人民医院创伤中心，常州213000）
Author(s):
Li Dong;  Zhou Weibo;  Zhu Chunhui;  et al.
Department of Trauma Center, Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213000, China
关键词:
股骨干骨折; 桥接组合式内固定系统; 锁定钢板
Keywords:
Femoral shaft fracture; Bridgelink combined fixation; Locking plate
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的比较桥接组合式内固定系统和锁定钢板系统治疗股骨干骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年1月~2019年1月82例股骨干骨折，其中32例使用锁定钢板内固定（钢板组），50例使用桥接组合式内固定系统固定（桥接组），均获得至少12个月的随访。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、并发症、骨折愈合时间，以及术后1年Harris髋关节功能评分、美国特种外科医院（Hospital for Special Surgery,HSS）膝关节功能评分。结果与钢板组比较，桥接组手术时间短［（70.9±8.3）min vs.（75.3±7.1）min，t=-2.513，P=0.014］，术中出血少［（265.4±95.1）ml vs.（396.6±99.3）ml，t=-5.990，P=0.000］。2组住院时间及并发症率差异无显著性（P>0.05）。桥接组骨折愈合时间［（4.9±11）月］短于钢板组［（5.8±1.5）月］（t=-3.018，P=0.003）。术后1年桥接组Harris髋关节评分及HSS膝关节评分高于钢板组［（84.1±5.1）分vs. （81.4±5.1）分，t=2.370，P=0.020；（85.3±6.4）分 vs. （81.8±6.0）分，t=2.512，P=0.014］。结论与锁定钢板相比，桥接组合式内固定系统治疗股骨干骨折创伤小，骨折愈合时间短，功能恢复佳。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic effects between the bridgelink combined fixation system and the locking plate system in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.MethodsA total of 82 cases of femoral shaft fractures treated between January 2015 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 32 cases receiving the locking plate system (Group Plate) and 50 cases with bridgelink combined fixation (Group Bridgelink). All the cases were followed up for at least 12 months. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, inhospital stay, complications and fracture healing time as well as hip joint functions (Harris score) and knee joint functions (HSS score) at 1 year postoperatively were compared between the two groups.ResultsAs compared to the Group Plate, the Group Bridgelink had significantly shorter operation time ［(70.9±8.3) min vs. (75.3±7.1) min, t=-2.513, P=0.014］, less intraoperative bleeding ［(265.4±95.1) ml vs. (396.6±99.3) ml, t=-5.990, P=0.000］, shorter fracture healing time ［(4.9±1.1) months vs. (5.8±1.5) months, t=-3.018, P=0.003］ and higher Harris scores and HSS scores ［(84.1±5.1) points vs. (81.4±5.1) points, t=2.370, P=0.020; (85.3±6.4) points vs. (81.8±6.0) points, t=2.512, P=0.014］. No significant difference between groups was found in inhospital stay or complications (P>0.05).ConclusionThe bridgelink combined fixation system can better treat femoral shaft fractures than the locking plate system owing to less trauma, shorter fracture healing time and better function recovery.

参考文献/References:

[1]赵志明,刘玉民.应用Taylor三维空间外固定架辅助闭合复位交锁髓内钉固定治疗股骨干骨折.实用骨科杂志,2016,22(12):1121-1123.
[2]王亦璁,刘忻,姜保国,等.骨与关节损伤.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.1395-1396.
[3]胥少汀,葛宝丰,陆裕朴,等.实用骨科学.第3版.北京:人民军医出版社,2010.626-627.
[4]王维,谢程欣,周昊楠,等.可膨胀髓内钉与交锁髓内钉修复股骨干骨折的Meta分析.中国组织工程研究,2020,24(3):477-484.
[5]黄飞,赖爱宁,于凤宾,等.股骨干多节段骨折选择桥接组合式内固定系统治疗的疗效分析.中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2019,34(2):161-163.
[6]汪亮,黄朝朝,于娇娜,等.桥接系统混棒与双棒结构治疗股骨及胫骨骨折的生物力学特点.中国组织工程研究,2020,24(6):888-892.
[7]Slongo T,Audigé L,Schlickewei W,et al.International Association for Pediatric Traumatology. Development and validation of the AO pediatric comprehensive classification of long bone fractures by the Pediatric Expert Group of the AO Foundation in collaboration with AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation and the International Association for Pediatric Traumatology. J Pediatr Orthop,2006,26(1):43-49.
[8]Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures:treatment by mold arthroplasty:an endresult study using a new method of result evaluation.J Bone Joint Surg Am,1969,51(4):737-755.
[9]Insall JN,Ranawat CS,Aglietti P,et al.A comparison of models of total kneereplacement prostheses.J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1976,58(6):754-765.
[10]Tosun B.Medial approach for the treatment of femur fractures in association with vascular injury.Injury,2020,51(6):1367-1372.
[11]Haidukewych GJ,Berry DJ.Nonunion of fractures of the subtrochanteric region of the femur.Clin Orthop Relat Res,2004,(419):185-188.
[12]苗凯松,陈伟.桥接组合式内固定系统治疗成年锁骨中段骨折的疗效分析.中国微创外科杂志,2018,18(7):628-631.
[13]熊鹰,陆继鹏,李群辉,等.桥接组合式金属内固定植入系统对犬骨折愈合的影响.中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011,15(30):5556-5560.
[14]钱建军,李锦锦,江显俊.微创环扎辅助髓内钉治疗长斜形股骨转子下骨折的疗效分析.中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(12):1092-1095.
[15]吴泽海,王永清,董黎敏,等.异体骨接骨板联合不同螺钉治疗股骨干骨折有限元分析.实用骨科杂志,2014,20(10):910-913.
[16]Kseolu E,Durak K,Bilgen MS,et al.Comparison of two biological internal fixation techniques in the treatment of adult femur shaft fractures(platescrews and locked intramedullary nail)．Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg,2011，17(2)：159-165.
[17]喻鑫罡,张先龙,曾炳芳.骨折段低频可控微动影响骨痂矿化与力学特性的实验研究.上海交通大学学报(医学版),2008,28(12):1491-1495.
[18]宋正鑫,祝腾蛟,刘冰川,等.大鼠骨折模型局部注射C型钠尿肽(CNP)对骨折愈合的影响.中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(9):827-831.
[19]赵烽,熊鹰,张仲子,等.桥接组合式内固定治疗股骨骨折的效果及生物力学特征.中国组织工程研究,2014,18(13):2127-2132.
[20]徐永清,吴一芃,熊鹰,等.桥接组合式内固定系统治疗四肢骨折.中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(6):465-469.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email：wuyu9967@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-09