²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×/References:
[1]Sabanegh E, Agarwal A. Male infertility. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, eds. Campbellª²Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders,2012.636-637.
[2]Halpern JA, Thirumavalavan N, Kohn TP, et al. Distribution of Semen parameters among adolescent males undergoing fertility preservation in a multicenter international cohort. Urology,2019,127:119-123.
[3]Sajadi H, Hosseini J, Farrahi F, et al. Varicocelectomy may improve results for sperm retrieval and pregnancy rate in nonª²obstructive azoospermic men. Int J Fertil Steril,2019,12(4):303-305.
[4]Machen GL, Johnson D, Nissen MA, et al. Time to improvement of semen parameters after microscopic varicocelectomy: When it occurs and its effects on fertility. Andrologia,2020,52(2):e13500.
[5]Demird¢‰en ÿðþ ‰C O, ¦Zzkaya F, Cinisliolu AE, et al. A comparison between the efficacy and safety of microscopic inguinal and subinguinal varicocelectomy. Turk J Urol,2019,45(4):254-260.
[6]Gupta C, Chinchole A, Shah R, et al. Microscopic varicocelectomy as a treatment option for patients with severe oligospermia. Investig Clin Urol,2018,59(3):182-186.
[7]Lomboy JR, Coward RM. The varicocele: clinical presentation, evaluation, and surgical management. Semin Intervent Radiol,2016,33(3):163-169.
[8]Cayan S, Kadioglu TC, Tefekli A, et al. Comparison of results and complications of high ligation surgery and microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele. Urology,2000,55(5):750-754.
[9]Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, et al. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol,1992,148(6):1808-1811.
[10]Grober ED. O¡¯brien J, Jarvi KA, et al. Preservation of testicular arteries during subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: clinical considerations. J Androl,2014,25(5):740-743.
[11]Lv JX, Wang LL, Wei XD, et al.Comparison of treatment outcomes of different spermatic vein ligation procedures in varicocele treatment. Am J Ther,2015,23(6):e1329-e1334.
[12]Hopps CV, Lemer ML, Schlegel PN, et al. Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a microscopic study of the inguinal versus subinguinal approach. J Urol,2013,170(6 Pt 1):2366-2370.
[13]Lv KL, Zhuang JT, Zhao L, et al. Varicocele anatomy during subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy in Chinese men. Andrologia,2015,47(10):1190-1195.
[14]Zhang Y, Yang X, Wu X, et al. Microsurgical varicocelectomy with transfixing of the difficultª²toª²isolate periarterial vein using microsutures. Urology,2015,85(4):948-952.
[15]ÀɽðÌ³ÂÃÀÔª£¬½êÅ£¬µÈ.¸¹Ç»¾µÏ±£ÁôغÍ趯ÂöµÄ¾«Ë÷¾²Âö¸ßλ½áÔúÊõ.Öйú΢´´Íâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾£¬2014£¬14£¨2£©£º164-168.
[16]Õź㣬Î⺣Х£¬Ðì•F£¬µÈ.¸¹Ç»¾µÏÂ2ÖÖ¾«Ë÷ÄÚ¾²Âö¸ßλ½áÔúÊõʽµÄÁÙ´²Ð§¹û±È½Ï.Öйú΢´´Íâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾,2017,17£¨6£©£º527-530.
[17]Wu X, Liu Q, Zhang R, et al. Therapeutic efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery versus microsurgery for varicocele of adult males: A metaª²analysis. Medicine (Baltimore),2017,96(34):e7818.
[18]Alª²Kandari AM, Khudair A, Arafa A, et al. Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy in 100 consecutive cases: Spermatic cord vascular anatomy, recurrence and hydrocele outcome analysis. Arab J Urol,2018,16(1):181-187.
[19]¢sayan S, Orhan I¡¤, Akbay E, et al. Systematic review of treatment methods for recurrent varicoceles to compare postª²treatment sperm parameters, pregnancy and complication rates. Andrologia,2019,51(11):e13419.