[1]¹¬Âú³É Ô¬ÈóÇ¿**.ǯÔú·¨ÔÚÏÔ΢¾µÏ¸¹¹É¹µÏ¾«Ë÷¾²Âö½áÔúÊõÖеÄÓ¦ÓÃ[J].Öйú΢´´Íâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾,2020,01(8):713-716.
¡¡Gong Mancheng,Yuan Runqiang..The Effect of Pickingª²ligation Method to Handle the Adhered Periarterial Vein in Microsurgical Subinguinal Varicocelectomy[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2020,01(8):713-716.
µã»÷¸´ÖÆ

ǯÔú·¨ÔÚÏÔ΢¾µÏ¸¹¹É¹µÏ¾«Ë÷¾²Âö½áÔúÊõÖеÄÓ¦ÓÃ()
·ÖÏíµ½£º

¡¶Öйú΢´´Íâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾¡·[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

¾í:
01
ÆÚÊý:
2020Äê8ÆÚ
Ò³Âë:
713-716
À¸Ä¿:
ÁÙ´²Ñо¿
³ö°æÈÕÆÚ:
2020-08-25

ÎÄÕÂÐÅÏ¢/Info

Title:
The Effect of Pickingª²ligation Method to Handle the Adhered Periarterial Vein in Microsurgical Subinguinal Varicocelectomy
×÷Õß:
¹¬Âú³É Ô¬ÈóÇ¿**
£¨ÖÐɽÊÐÈËÃñÒ½ÔºÃÚÄòÍâ¿Æ£¬ÖÐɽ528403£©
Author(s):
Gong Mancheng Yuan Runqiang.
Department of Urology, The People¡¯s Hospital of Zhongshan, Zhongshan 528403, China
¹Ø¼ü´Ê:
²»ÓýÏÔ΢ÊÖÊõǯÔú·¨¾«Ë÷¾²ÂöÇúÕž«Ë÷¾²Âö½áÔúÊõ
Keywords:
InfertilityMicrosurgeryPickingª²ligationVaricoceleVaricocelectomy
ÎÄÏ×±êÖ¾Âë:
A
ÕªÒª:
Ä¿µÄ̽ÌÖÏÔ΢¾µÏ¸¹¹É¹µÏ¾«Ë÷¾²Âö½áÔúÊõÖÐǯÔú·¨´¦ÀíغÍ趯ÂöÅÔÕ³Á¬¾²ÂöµÄ°²È«ÐÔ¡£·½·¨2015Äê6ÔÂ~2017Äê1ÔÂÏÔ΢¾µÏ¸¹¹É¹µÏ¾«Ë÷¾²Âö½áÔúÊõÖвÉÓÃǯÔú·¨´¦ÀíغÍ趯ÂöÅÔÕ³Á¬¾²Âö£¨ÀûÓÃÏÔ΢Ä÷×Ó½«ØºÍ趯ÂöÅÔÕ³Á¬µÄ¾²ÂöÌáÆð£¬ÀûÓÃ4ª²0Ë¿ÏßÔÚ¾¡¿ÉÄÜ¿¿½üغÍ趯ÂöºÍÕ³Á¬¾²ÂöµÄ·Ö½çÃæ½áÔúÕ³Á¬µÄ¾²Âö£©£¬¹Û²ìÊõºó¾«Ë÷¾²ÂöÇúÕŸ´·¢¡¢ÊõºóÒõÄÒË®Öס¢¾«×Ó¸ÄÉƼ°Ö¢×´»º½âµÈÇé¿ö¡£½á¹ûÓëÊõÇ°Ïà±È£¬Êõºó»¼Õß¾«×ÓŨ¶ÈÃ÷ÏÔÌá¸ß£Û£¨39.0¡À9.5£©¡Á106/ml vs.£¨22.4¡À8.1)¡Á106/ml£¬t=9.189£¬P=0.000£Ý£»Êõºó»¼Õß¾«×ÓÇ°ÏòÔ˶¯ÂÊÃ÷ÏÔ¸ÄÉÆ£Û£¨37.9¡À6.9£©% vs.£¨23.3¡À10.3£©%£¬t=20ª±787£¬P=0.000£Ý£»Õý³£¾«×Ó°Ù·Ö±ÈÃ÷ÏÔÌáÉý£Û£¨7.3¡À2.2£©% vs.£¨3.1¡À2.0£©%£¬t=9.715£¬P=0.000£Ý£»Êõºó»¼ÕßÒõÄÒÌÛÍ´Ã÷ÏÔ¼õÇá£Û£¨1.0¡À0.6£©·Övs.£¨5.6¡À0.8£©·Ö£¬t=-22.939£¬P=0.000£Ý¡£52ÀýÊõºóËæ·Ã6~24¸öÔ£¬Æ½¾ù18¸öÔ¡£Êõºó³¬Éù¼ì²éÎÞ¾«Ë÷¾²ÂöÇúÕŸ´·¢£¬ÎÞÒõÄÒË®Ö×£¬ÎÞغÍèήËõ¡£½áÂÛÏÔ΢¾µÏ¸¹¹É¹µÏ¾«Ë÷¾²Âö½áÔúÊõÖвÉÓÃǯÔú·¨ÄÜ°²È«ÓÐЧµØ´¦ÀíغÍ趯ÂöÅÔÕ³Á¬¾²Âö¡£
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of pickingª²ligation method in the treatment of the adhered periarterial vein in microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy.MethodsIn subinguinal varicocelectomy performed from June 2015 to January 2017, we handled the difficultª²toª²isolate periarterial vein with pickingª²ligation method (we picked up the adhered periarterial vein with microscopic tweezer and ligated it with 4ª²0 silk suture as near to the adjacent border between testicular artery and adherent vein as possible). We analyzed the incidence of recurrence, postoperative scrotal edema, sperm improvement and the symptom relief.ResultsAs compared with that before surgery, the sperm concentration of postoperative patients significantly increased £Û(39.0¡À9ª±5)¡Á106/ml vs.£¨22.4¡À8.1)¡Á106/ml, t=9.189, P=0.000£Ý, the rate of sperm anterior motility was significantly improved £Û(37.9¡À6.9)% vs. (23.3¡À10.3)%, t=20.787, P=0.000£Ý, the percentage of normal sperm increased significantly £Û(7.3¡À2ª±2)% vs. (3.1¡À2.0)%, t=9.715, P=0.000£Ý, and the postoperative pain relieved significantly £Û(1.0¡À0.6) points vs. (5.6¡À0.8) points, t=-22.939, P=0.000£Ý. The 52 patients were followed up for 6-24 months, with an average of 18 months. Postoperative ultrasonography showed no recurrence of varicocele, scrotal edema or testicular atrophy.ConclusionPickingª²ligation method is an effective and safe surgical technique in microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy to handle the adhered periarterial vein which is difficult to isolate and ligate.

²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×/References:

[1]Sabanegh E, Agarwal A. Male infertility. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, eds. Campbellª²Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders,2012.636-637.
[2]Halpern JA, Thirumavalavan N, Kohn TP, et al. Distribution of Semen parameters among adolescent males undergoing fertility preservation in a multicenter international cohort. Urology,2019,127:119-123.
[3]Sajadi H, Hosseini J, Farrahi F, et al. Varicocelectomy may improve results for sperm retrieval and pregnancy rate in nonª²obstructive azoospermic men. Int J Fertil Steril,2019,12(4):303-305.
[4]Machen GL, Johnson D, Nissen MA, et al. Time to improvement of semen parameters after microscopic varicocelectomy: When it occurs and its effects on fertility. Andrologia,2020,52(2):e13500.
[5]Demird¢‰en ÿðþ ‰C O, ¦Zzkaya F, Cinisliolu AE, et al. A comparison between the efficacy and safety of microscopic inguinal and subinguinal varicocelectomy. Turk J Urol,2019,45(4):254-260.
[6]Gupta C, Chinchole A, Shah R, et al. Microscopic varicocelectomy as a treatment option for patients with severe oligospermia. Investig Clin Urol,2018,59(3):182-186.
[7]Lomboy JR, Coward RM. The varicocele: clinical presentation, evaluation, and surgical management. Semin Intervent Radiol,2016,33(3):163-169.
[8]Cayan S, Kadioglu TC, Tefekli A, et al. Comparison of results and complications of high ligation surgery and microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele. Urology,2000,55(5):750-754.
[9]Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, et al. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol,1992,148(6):1808-1811.
[10]Grober ED. O¡¯brien J, Jarvi KA, et al. Preservation of testicular arteries during subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: clinical considerations. J Androl,2014,25(5):740-743.
[11]Lv JX, Wang LL, Wei XD, et al.Comparison of treatment outcomes of different spermatic vein ligation procedures in varicocele treatment. Am J Ther,2015,23(6):e1329-e1334.
[12]Hopps CV, Lemer ML, Schlegel PN, et al. Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a microscopic study of the inguinal versus subinguinal approach. J Urol,2013,170(6 Pt 1):2366-2370.
[13]Lv KL, Zhuang JT, Zhao L, et al. Varicocele anatomy during subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy in Chinese men. Andrologia,2015,47(10):1190-1195.
[14]Zhang Y, Yang X, Wu X, et al. Microsurgical varicocelectomy with transfixing of the difficultª²toª²isolate periarterial vein using microsutures. Urology,2015,85(4):948-952.
[15]ÀɽðÌ³ÂÃÀÔª£¬½­êÅ£¬µÈ.¸¹Ç»¾µÏ±£ÁôغÍ趯ÂöµÄ¾«Ë÷¾²Âö¸ßλ½áÔúÊõ.Öйú΢´´Íâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾£¬2014£¬14£¨2£©£º164-168.
[16]Õź㣬Î⺣Х£¬Ðì•F£¬µÈ.¸¹Ç»¾µÏÂ2ÖÖ¾«Ë÷ÄÚ¾²Âö¸ßλ½áÔúÊõʽµÄÁÙ´²Ð§¹û±È½Ï.Öйú΢´´Íâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾,2017,17£¨6£©£º527-530.
[17]Wu X, Liu Q, Zhang R, et al. Therapeutic efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery versus microsurgery for varicocele of adult males: A metaª²analysis. Medicine (Baltimore),2017,96(34):e7818.
[18]Alª²Kandari AM, Khudair A, Arafa A, et al. Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy in 100 consecutive cases: Spermatic cord vascular anatomy, recurrence and hydrocele outcome analysis. Arab J Urol,2018,16(1):181-187.
[19]¢sayan S, Orhan I¡¤, Akbay E, et al. Systematic review of treatment methods for recurrent varicoceles to compare postª²treatment sperm parameters, pregnancy and complication rates. Andrologia,2019,51(11):e13419.

±¸×¢/Memo

±¸×¢/Memo:
»ù½ðÏîÄ¿£ºÖÐɽÊÐҽѧ¿ÆÑлù½ðÏîÄ¿(2016J040)**ͨѶ×÷Õߣ¬Eª²mail£ºyuanrunqiang2013@163.com
¸üÐÂÈÕÆÚ/Last Update: 2020-11-13