[1]江东,余家阔,敖英芳,等.4例同种异体半月板移植术后中期随访报告[J].中国微创外科杂志,2009,09(6):545-548.
　Jiang Dong,Yu Jiakuo,Ao Yingfang,et al.Midterm Followup of Meniscus Allograft Transplantation: Report of 4 Cases[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2009,09(6):545-548.
点击复制

4例同种异体半月板移植术后中期随访报告()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
09
期数:
2009年6期
页码:
545-548
栏目:
出版日期:
2009-08-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Midterm Followup of Meniscus Allograft Transplantation: Report of 4 Cases
作者:
江东; 余家阔; 敖英芳; 龚熹; 王永健; 苗羽
北京大学第三医院北京大学运动医学研究所，北京100191
Author(s):
Jiang Dong;  Yu Jiakuo;  Ao Yingfang;  et al.
Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
关键词:
半月板; 同种异体半月板移植; 关节镜; 核磁共振
Keywords:
Meniscus; Meniscus allograft transplantation; Arthroscopy; MRI
分类号:
R687.4
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨同种异体半月板移植术后中期的临床效果。方法2005年6～7月，4例半月板切除术后患者接受关节镜辅助下的同种异体半月板移植。男3例，女1例。年龄分别21、27、35、38岁。3例内侧半月板移植，1例外侧半月板移植。随访内容包括症状及体征，术前及随访时的IKDC、Lysholm、Tegner评分。随访通过膝关节正侧位、双膝持重位及双下肢全长X线检查比较患侧及健侧关节间隙和力线改变，评估膝关节退变情况，通过MRI检查评估移植半月板位置及信号改变。其中1例接受二次关节镜探查。结果随访时间44～45个月。4例均无关节疼痛、肿胀等，关节活动度正常，IKDC、Lysholm及Tegner评分分别为84.75±2.63、91.50±4.43及7.00±0.82，术前为60.50±14.06、69.25±22.04及4.00±0.82。X线提示1例关节间隙较健侧狭窄2 mm，其余正常，力线均正常。MRI提示3例内侧半月板体部均有轻度外凸，体部及后角有Ⅱ～Ⅲ度信号。1例二次关节镜探查提示移植半月板形态及张力正常。结论同种异体半月板移植术后中期临床效果良好，关节无明显退变，MRI对评估移植半月板具有重要价值。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the midterm (44 months) outcomes of meniscus allograft transplantation in four patients. MethodsBetween June and July 2005, four patients (3 medial and 1 lateral; 3 men and 1 women; aged 21, 27, 35, 38 years) underwent arthroscopyassisted meniscus allograft transplantation in our hospital.The clinical outcome of the patients was evaluated by assessing the symptoms and signs, IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores and examining the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the transplanted knee, weightbearing radiographs of the both knees, anteroposterior radiographs of the lower extremities as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). One patient underwent secondlook arthroscopy. ResultsThe followup time was 44-45 months. During the period, all the patients showed a normal motion range of the knee without pain or effusion of the knee joints. The mean IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores of the patients were 84.75±2.63, 91.50±4.43 and 7.00±0.82 respectively, which were significantly higher than those detected before the operation (60.50±14.06, 69.25±22.04 and 4.00±0.82). The radiological results revealed no obvious degeneration or alignment changes though a 2mm narrowing was shown in one of the patients. MRI showed mild extrusion for the body of the transplanted medial menisci and Ⅱ to Ⅲ stage signal for the body and the posterior horn. Almost normal performance and tension of the transplanted meniscus was shown by arthroscopy. ConclusionsMeniscus allograft transplantation shows good outcomes in midterm followup. MRI is valuable for evaluating the implanted meniscus.

参考文献/References:

[1]Bonneux I,Vandekerckhove B.Arthroscopic partial lateral meniscectomy longterm results in athletes.Acta Orthop Belg,2002,68:356-361.
[2]Lubowitz JH,Verdonk PC,Reid JB 3rd,et al.Meniscus allograft transplantation:a current concepts review.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2007,15:476-492.
[3]余家阔,于长隆,敖英芳,等.关节镜辅助下的同种异体半月板移植(附4例术后20个月以上随访报告).中国运动医学杂志,2007,26:261-265.
[4]van Arkel ER,Goei R,de Ploeg I,et al.Meniscal allografts: evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.Arthroscopy,2000,16:517-521.
[5]江东,余家阔.组织移植和细胞移植在膝关节半月板损伤治疗中的应用及存在问题.中国运动医学杂志,2006,25:75-79.
[6]Crues JV 3rd,Mink J,Levy TL,et al.Meniscal tears of the knee: accuracy of MR imaging.Radiology,1987,164:445-448.
[7]Rath E,Richmond JC,Yassir W,et al.Meniscal allograft transplantation. Two to eightyear results.Am J Sports Med,2001,29:410-414.
[8]Hommen JP,Applegate GR,Del Pizzo W.Meniscus allograft transplantation:tenyear results of cryopreserved allografts.Arthroscopy,2007,23:388-393.
[9]Verdonk P,Verstraete K,Almqvist K，et al.Meniscal allograft transplantation:longterm clinical results with radiological and magnetic imaging correlations.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2006,14:694-706.
[10]Potter HG,Rodeo SA,Wickiewicz TL,et al.MR imaging of meniscal allografts:correlation with clinical and arthroscopic outcomes.Radiology,1996,198:509-514.
[11]Verstraete KL,Verdonk R,Lootens T,et al.Current status and imaging of allograft meniscal transplantation.Eur J Radiol,1997,26:16-22.
[12]Rodeo SA.Meniscal allografts:where do we stand?Am J Sports Med,2001,29:246-261.
[13]Breitenseher MJ,Trattnig S,Dobrocky I,et al.MR imaging of meniscal subluxation in the knee.Acta Radiol,1997,38:876-879.
[14M]iller TT,Staron RB,Feldman F,et al.Meniscal position on routine MR imaging of the knee.Skeletal Radiol,1997,26:424-427.
[15]Wang YJ,Yu JK,Luo H，et al.An anatomical and histological study of human meniscal horn bony insertions and perimeniscal attachments as a basis for meniscal transplantation.Chin Med J (Engl),2009,122:536-540.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
余家阔通讯作者
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-01-08