[1]龚建云*,汪江,郑云彭,等.改良荷包缝合法在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(5):455-457.
　Gong Jianyun,Wang Jiang,Zheng Yunpeng,et al.Application of Improved Purse Suture in Laparoscopic Appendectomy[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2017,17(5):455-457.
点击复制

改良荷包缝合法在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的应用()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
17
期数:
2017年5期
页码:
455-457
栏目:
技术改进
出版日期:
2017-07-14

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of Improved Purse Suture in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
作者:
龚建云*; 汪江; 郑云彭; 白吉星; 梁永强
云南省红河州弥勒市人民医院普通外科，弥勒652399
Author(s):
Gong Jianyun;  Wang Jiang;  Zheng Yunpeng;  et al.
Department of General Surgery, Mile People’s Hospital, Mile 652399, China
关键词:
阑尾炎; 腹腔镜阑尾切除术; 改良荷包缝合法
Keywords:
Appendicitis; Laparoscopic appendectomy; Improved purse suture
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的探讨改良荷包缝合法在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的可行性及临床效果。方法2012年1月~2014年12月我科在36例腹腔镜阑尾切除术中应用改良荷包缝合法,即间断环形缝合前半荷包与间断纵形（或斜形）缝合后半荷包合成一个荷包，包埋阑尾残端。结果术中无须改变持针方式和缝合习惯即可轻松完成腹腔镜下荷包缝合，36例LA均顺利收紧荷包缝线并包埋阑尾残端，无一例中转开腹。手术时间(70±20) min，术后住院时间(5±2) d。无荷包缝线撕裂浆肌层、阑尾残端漏或腹腔残余脓肿等并发症。36例术后半年通过电话随访，均无腹痛、腹胀等。结论改良荷包缝合法缝合荷包包埋阑尾残端具有操作方便，安全可靠的优点，避免应用传统方法缝合荷包给手术操作带来的诸多不便，降低因阑尾根部处理不满意而中转开腹的几率，值得推广应用。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility and clinical effect of improved purse suture in laparoscopic appendectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 36 cases of laparoscopic appendectomy admitted from January 2012 to December 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were treated with the improved purse suture that synthesized two different half pouches to embed appendix stump. The one half of a pouch was given discontinuous annular suture, and the other half of a pouch was given discontinuous longitudinal (or oblique) suture.ResultsThe operation was completed without the need of changing needle holding and suture habits. The purse suture was successfully tighten with the appendix stump embedded in the 36 cases. No conversion to open laparotomy was required. The operation time was (70±20) min, and the postoperative hospital stay was (5±2) d. No rupture of sarcoplasmic layer, leakage of appendix stump, or abdominal residual abscess occurred. All cases were postoperatively followed up by telephone for half a year. No abdominal pain or abdominal distension was seen.ConclusionThe improved purse suture for the treatment of the embedding appendix stump has advantages of convenient operation, safety and reliability, and can avoid the inconvenience caused by the traditional method of suture and reduce the incidence of conversion to open surgery, being worthy of popularization.

参考文献/References:

[1]徐大华,刘东斌.急性阑尾炎腹腔镜手术指征及技巧.中国实用外科杂志,2015,35(3):499-501.
[2]孙发贵,孙廓.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗急性阑尾炎比较.中国临床医学,2008,15(3):368.
[3]Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy trends and outcomes in the United States: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample（NIS），2004-2011.Am Surg,2014,80(10):1074-1077.
[4]刘强，杨峥.急性阑尾炎肥胖患者腹腔镜与开腹手术的对比研究.中国微创外科杂志，2014,14(10):903-905.
[5]李永超,王甲天,崔明福,等.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗急性阑尾炎穿孔的比较.中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(4):327-330.
[6]张星,陈文忠,华科俊.腹腔镜阑尾切除术阑尾根部3种处理方法的比较.中国微创外科杂志,2013,13(2):139-157.
[7]张永康,王玉珍,杜明国,等.腹腔镜阑尾切除术阑尾残端荷包缝合包埋与Hem-o-lok的比较.中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(6):512-515.
[8]Street D,bodai BI, Owens LJ, et al. Simple ligation vs stump in version in appendectomy Arch Surg,1998,123(4):689-690.
[9]官伟军,郑小平,麦显强,等.Hem-o-lok结扎锁在LA中的应用.中国微创外科杂志,2012,12(5):903-905.
[10]江鸣,蔡兆辉,汤永胜,等.腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床应用.中国内镜杂志,2012,18(10):1105-1107.
[11]林增煊,林洪堂,林长国,等.腹腔镜阑尾切除术50例报告.中华普通外科手术学杂志（电子版),2012,6(2):59-60.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，E-mail：gjyfhh@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-07-14