[1]朱贵军 严哲 刘阳 宋志良 李斌 陈兴澎**.急性A型主动脉夹层合并Neri C型冠状动脉受累细化分型的外科治疗策略[J].中国微创外科杂志,2024,01(11):731-736.
　Zhu Guijun,Yan Zhe,Liu Yang,et al.Surgical Treatment Strategy for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Complicated With Neri Type C Coronary Artery Involvement on the Basis of Detailed Classification[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2024,01(11):731-736.
点击复制

急性A型主动脉夹层合并Neri C型冠状动脉受累细化分型的外科治疗策略()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2024年11期
页码:
731-736
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2024-11-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Surgical Treatment Strategy for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Complicated With Neri Type C Coronary Artery Involvement on the Basis of Detailed Classification
作者:
朱贵军 严哲 刘阳 宋志良 李斌 陈兴澎**
(郑州大学附属洛阳市中心医院心脏中心洛阳市心胸外科临床研究中心，洛阳471009)
Author(s):
Zhu Guijun;  Yan Zhe;  Liu Yang;  et al.
Heart Center, Luoyang Central Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Luoyang Clinical Research Center of Cardiothoracic Surgery,Luoyang 471009, China
关键词:
Neri分型; 冠状动脉; 急性A型主动脉夹层; 外科手术
Keywords:
Neri classification; Coronary artery; Acute type A aortic dissection; Surgical operation
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨急性A型主动脉夹层(acute type A aortic dissection，ATAAD)合并Neri C型冠状动脉（冠脉）受累细化分型的外科治疗策略。方法回顾性分析我院2020年11月~2024年2月21例ATAAD合并Neri C型冠脉受累的病例资料。夹层累及冠脉，发病时间<1周，行全主动脉弓替换、降主动脉支架象鼻人工血管置入、升主动脉置换及冠脉处理。细化分型及冠脉处理方法：C1型(冠脉开口局部损伤破裂，与假腔部分连接，冠脉开口内外膜无分离)7例以人工材料“铜钱样”修复；C2型(冠脉开口严重损伤撕脱，与假腔完全连接，冠脉近段累及轻微，内外膜局部分离，未形成套袖)3例以8 mm人工血管置换；C3型(冠脉开口严重损伤撕脱，与假腔完全连接，冠脉近段累及严重，内外膜完全分离，且形成套袖)11例以大隐静脉旁路移植。结果院内死亡2例(均为C3型)，均心脏复跳困难，体外膜氧合(extracorporeal membrane oxygenation，ECMO)辅助循环，分别于术后当天、第2天死亡。19例出院患者出院前复查主动脉及冠脉CTA，无冠脉开口狭窄和桥血管狭窄。术后6、12、18个月复查主动脉及冠脉CTA。19例随访6~36个月，平均21个月，无冠脉开口狭窄和桥血管狭窄病例。纽约心脏协会（NYHA）心功能分级Ⅰ级15例，Ⅱ级4例。结论ATAAD合并Neri C型冠脉受累的细化分型对外科实施精准治疗具有指导性意义。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the surgical treatment strategy of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) complicated with Neri type C coronary artery involvement on the basis of detailed classification.MethodsClinical data of 21 cases of ATAAD complicated with Neri type C coronary artery involvement in our hospital from November 2020 to February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The dissection involved the coronary artery, and the onset time was less than 1 week. Total aortic arch replacement, descending aorta stent and elephant trunk artificial vessel placement, ascending aorta replacement, and coronary artery management were performed. The treatment of detailed classification and coronary artery was as follows. Seven cases with type C1 (local damage and rupture of coronary artery opening, partial connection with pseudolumen, and no proximal coronary involvement) were repaired with artificial material “copper coin sample”; 3 cases with type C2 (severe avulsion of coronary artery opening, complete connection with pseudolumen, slight proximal involvement of coronary artery, and no sleeve formation) were replaced with 8 mm artificial vessels; 11 cases with type C3 (severe avulsion of coronary artery opening, complete connection with pseudolumen, severe proximal involvement of coronary artery, and sleeve formation) were transplanted by great saphenous vein bypass.ResultsTwo patients died in hospital (all type C3), all of whom had difficulty in cardioversion and were given extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) assisted circulation, and passed away on the same day and the second day after surgery, respectively. Aortic and coronary CTA were reexamined in the remaining 19 patients before discharge, and no coronary artery opening stenosis or bridge stenosis was found. Aortic and coronary CTA were reexamined at 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery, respectively. The 19 patients were followed up for 6-36 months (mean, 21 months), and there were no cases of coronary artery opening stenosis or bridge stenosis. According to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, there were 15 patients with grade Ⅰ and 4 patients with grade Ⅱ.ConclusionThe detailed classification of ATAAD combined with Neri type C coronary artery involvement has guiding significance for surgical precision treatment.

参考文献/References:

[1]Imoto K,Uchida K,Karube N,et al.Risk analysis and improvement of strategies in patients who have acute type A aortic dissection with coronary artery dissection.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2013,44(3):419-424.
[2]Neri E,Toscano T,Papalia U,et al.Proximal aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion:presentation,management,and outcome.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2001,121(3):552-560.
[3]董书强,曹文峰,谢鹏禄,等.合并冠状动脉灌注不良的急性A型主动脉夹层的外科治疗.岭南心血管病杂志,2023,29(4):375-379.
[4]郭文静,胡杰,陈兴澎.右美托咪定对急性主动脉夹层患者镇痛和镇静的影响:前瞻性随机对照研究.中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(5):397-400.
[5]胡双龙,胡亚立,卢辉俊.升主动脉夹层合并腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗1例报告.中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(7):670-672.
[6]朱家德,杨珏,李欣,等.急性A型主动脉夹层合并冠状动脉受累的治疗经验与临床特点.中华胸心血管外科杂志,2022,38(4):193-198.
[7]Grimm JC,Magruder JT,Crawford TC,et al.Differential outcomes of type A dissection with malperfusion according to affected organ system.Ann Cardiothorac Surg,2016,5(3):202-208.
[8]Zhang D,Zhu GJ,Wei XY,et al.Repair of coronary artery ostium with a ringshaped bovine pericardial patch.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2022,35(5):ivac251.
[9]秦卫,陈鑫,黄福华.冠状动脉受累的急性A型主动脉夹层的外科治疗.中华胸心血管外科杂志,2015,31(12):729-731.
[10]Kawahito K,Kimura N,Yamaguchi A,et al.Malperfusion in type A aortic dissection:results of emergency central aortic repair.GenThorac Cardiovasc Surg,2019,67(7):594-601.
[11]丛子涵,张明,吴奇勇.以CYP2C19基因多态性为导向的双抗治疗方案在冠状动脉旁路移植术后的应用价值.中国微创外科杂志,2023,23(6):442-448.
[12]朱贵军,陈兴澎.急性A型主动脉夹层根部的个体化治疗与精准外科操作策略.中国微创外科杂志,2023,23(8):561-566.
[13]刘雁翔,李岩,史艺,等.基于急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层累及冠状动脉阜外分型的外科治疗策略及早期临床结果分析.中华胸心血管外科杂志,2018,34(11):641-645.
[14]卢子润,范阜东,薛云星,等.急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层合并冠状动脉灌注不良的手术处理.中华胸心血管外科杂志,2018,34(9):527-530.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：2019河南省医学科技攻关项目(LHGJ20191213)；2024河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目（LHGJ20240735）**通讯作者，Email：1245828464@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-02-10