[1]王苗苗 李秀芳** 黄相艳 孟泳圳.“垂钓式”子宫悬吊联合阴道荷包缝合包埋宫颈的腹腔镜广泛性子宫切除术[J].中国微创外科杂志,2024,01(7):473-478.
　Wang Miaomiao,Li Xiufang,Huang Xiangyan,et al.Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy With “Fishingstyle” Uterine Suspension and Vaginal Pursestring Suture Encapsulation of the Cervix for Cervical Cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2024,01(7):473-478.
点击复制

“垂钓式”子宫悬吊联合阴道荷包缝合包埋宫颈的腹腔镜广泛性子宫切除术()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2024年7期
页码:
473-478
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2024-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy With “Fishingstyle” Uterine Suspension and Vaginal Pursestring Suture Encapsulation of the Cervix for Cervical Cancer
作者:
王苗苗 李秀芳** 黄相艳 孟泳圳
(河南省安阳市肿瘤医院妇瘤科，安阳455000)
Author(s):
Wang Miaomiao;  Li Xiufang;  Huang Xiangyan;  et al.
Department of Gynecological Oncology, Anyang Tumor Hospital, Anyang 455000, China
关键词:
宫颈癌; 腹腔镜; 广泛性子宫切除术; 子宫悬吊法
Keywords:
Cervical cancer; Laparoscopy; Radical hysterectomy; Uterine suspension
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨“垂钓式”子宫悬吊联合阴道荷包缝合包埋宫颈的改良腹腔镜广泛性子宫切除术的安全性及有效性。方法回顾性分析2021年10月~2023年8月82例QuerleuMorrow分型C2型广泛性子宫切除术资料，其中36例腹腔镜手术(腹腔镜组)，46例开放手术(开放组)。腹腔镜组采用“垂钓式”子宫悬吊避免使用举宫杯，阴道荷包缝合包埋宫颈后切开阴道壁。比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、并发症、病理切缘阳性率及复发率。结果腹腔镜组术中出血量、术后住院时间明显少于开放组［40(30~130)ml vs. 80(20~300)ml，Z=-4.057，P=0.000；8.5(5~24)d vs. 10(5~26)d，Z=-2.975，P=0.003］；2组手术时间、并发症发生率、淋巴结切除个数、切缘阳性率、复发率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论“垂钓式”子宫悬吊联合阴道荷包缝合包埋宫颈的改良腹腔镜广泛性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌安全有效。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the safety and efficacy of “fishingstyle” uterine suspension and vaginal pursestring suture encapsulation of the cervix in modified laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.MethodsClinical data of 82 patients with cervical cancer who underwent QMC2 radical hysterectomy in our hospital from October 2021 to August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 36 cases in laparoscopic group (LRH) and 46 cases in abdominal group (ARH). In the laparoscopic group, the “fishingstyle” uterine suspension, rather than a uterine manipulator, was used to manipulate the uterus, followed by vaginal pursestring suture encapsulation of the cervix before copotomy. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, complications, positive rate of pathological margins, and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe LRH group showed less intraoperative bleeding and shorter postoperative hospital stay than the ARH group ［40 (30-130) ml vs. 80 (20-300) ml, Z=-4.057, P=0.000; 8.5 (5-24) d vs. 10 (5-26) d, Z=-2.975, P=0.003］. There were no significant differences in operation time, complications, the number of lymph node dissected, cutting edge positivity rate, and recurrence rate (P>0.05).ConclusionThe modified laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with “fishingstyle” uterine suspension and vaginal pursestring suture encapsulation of the cervix is safe and feasible.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈春林,郎景和,向阳,等.子宫颈癌腹腔镜手术治疗的中国专家共识.中华妇产科杂志,2020,55(9): 579-585.
[2]裴雪婷,王彦,李洪言,等.腹腔镜根治性手术在早期子宫颈癌治疗中应用的研究进展.中华妇产科杂志,2021,56(11):805-808.
[3]Kong TW,Kim J,Son JH,et al.Is minimally invasive radical surgery safe for patients with cervical cancer ≤2 cm in size?(MISAFE):Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLborAtion study (GORILLA1003).Gynecol Oncol,2023,176:122-129.
[4]Ramirez PT,Frumovitz M,Pareja R,et al.Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.N Engl J Med,2018,379(20):1895-1904.
[5]Melamed A,Margul DJ,Chen L,et al.Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for earlystage cervical cancer.N Engl J Med,2018,379(20):1905-1914.
[6]Lewicki PJ,Basourakos SP,Qiu Y,et al.Effect of a randomized,controlled trial on surgery for cervical cancer.N Engl J Med,2021,384(17):1669-1671.
[7]Karam A,Dorigo O.Minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic cancers：a cautionary tale.JAMA Oncol,2020,6(7):991-993.
[8]熊光武,张国楠.对早期宫颈癌腹腔镜与开腹手术远期疗效差异的思考.中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(1):1-3，30.
[9]Lago V,Tiermes M,PadillaIserte P,et al.Protective maneuver to avoid tumor spillage during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy:vaginal cuff closure.J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2021,28(2):174-175.
[10]中国抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会.子宫颈癌腹腔镜技术诊治指南(2023年版).中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2023,39(3):296-302.
[11]中国抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会.子宫颈癌诊断与治疗指南(2021年版).中国癌症杂志,2021,31(6):474-489.
[12]Bhatla N,Berek JS,Cuello Fredes M,et al.Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2019,145(1):129-135.
[13]Querleu D,Morrow CP.Classification of radical hysterectomy.Lancet Oncol,2008,9(3):297-303.
[14]周晖,刘昀昀,罗铭,等.《2023 NCCN子宫颈癌临床实践指南(第1版)》解读.中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2023,39(2):189-196.
[15]Cohen PA,Jhingran A,Oaknin A,et al.Cervical cancer.Lancet,2019,393(10167):169-182.
[16]Gupta S,Maheshwari A,Parab P,et al.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with stage IB2,IIA,or IIB squamous cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.J Clin Oncol,2018,36(16):1548-1555.
[17]Sedlis A,Bundy BN,Rotman MZ,et al.A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy:a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.Gynecol Oncol,1999,73(2):177-183.
[18]Ryu SY,Kim MH,Nam BH,et al.Intermediaterisk grouping of cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy:a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study.Br J Cancer,2014,110(2):278-285.
[19]卢琴,黄晨雯,汤凤玲.微创根治性子宫切除术对宫颈癌患者生活质量和炎性因子的影响.癌症进展,2023,21(14):1551-1554,1574.
[20]谢鹏,郭秋芬,张师前.复发性子宫颈癌的综合治疗.中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2022,38(5):499-503.
[21]Coronado PJ,Gracia M.Robotic radical hysterectomy after conization for patients with small volume earlystage cervical cancer.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,2024,92:102434.
[22]Chiva L,Zanagnolo V,Querleu D,et al.SUCCOR study:an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.Int J Gynecol Cancer,2020,30(9):1269-1277.
[23]Kong TW,Son JH,Paek J,et al.Prognostic factors influencing pelvic,extrapelvic,and intraperitoneal recurrences in lymph nodenegative earlystage cervical cancer patients following radical hysterectomy.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2020,252:94-99.
[24]Pedone Anchora L,Bizzarri N,Kucukmetin A,et al.Investigating the possible impact of peritoneal tumor exposure amongst women with early stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive approach.Eur J Surg Oncol,2021,47(5):1090-1097.
[25]Kanao H,Matsuo K,Aoki Y,et al.Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with nolook notouch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.J Gynecol Oncol,2019,30(3):e71.
[26]Kondo E,Yoshida K,KuboKaneda M,et al.Does vaginal cuff creation and avoidance of a uterine manipulator improve the prognosis of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer?A retrospective multicenter study.Cancers (Basel),2022,14(18):4389.
[27]Malzoni M,Tinelli R,Cosentino F,et al.Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer:our experience.Ann Surg Oncol,2009,16(5):1316-1323.
[28]Pellegrino A,Vizza E,Fruscio R,et al.Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer:analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.Eur J Surg Oncol,2009,35(1):98-103.
[29]Baiocchi G,Ribeiro R,Dos Reis R,et al.Open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: the CIRCOL group study.Ann Surg Oncol,2022,29(2):1151-1160.
[30]Wenzel HHB,Smolders RGV,Beltman JJ,et al.Survival of patients with earlystage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy:a nationwide cohort study and literature review.Eur J Cancer,2020,133:14-21.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目(LHGJ20210878)**通讯作者，Email：muhecao2006@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-10-06