[1]孙炜斌 哈木拉提·吐送* 阿衣丁·西热牙孜旦 阿斯木江·阿不拉 乃比江·毛拉库尔班 斯迪克江·尼亚孜 高新 夏韩 宋光鲁.俯卧分腿位与传统俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石的疗效比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2024,01(2):92-97.
　Sun Weibin,Hamulati Tusong,Ayiding Xireyazidan,et al.Comparison of Efficacy Between Prone Splitleg Position and Traditional Prone Position Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Upper Urinary Tract Stones[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2024,01(2):92-97.
点击复制

俯卧分腿位与传统俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石的疗效比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2024年2期
页码:
92-97
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2024-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Efficacy Between Prone Splitleg Position and Traditional Prone Position Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Upper Urinary Tract Stones
作者:
孙炜斌 哈木拉提·吐送* 阿衣丁·西热牙孜旦 阿斯木江·阿不拉 乃比江·毛拉库尔班 斯迪克江·尼亚孜 高新 夏韩 宋光鲁
(新疆医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科，乌鲁木齐830011)
Author(s):
Sun Weibin;  Hamulati Tusong;  Ayiding Xireyazidan;  et al．
Department of Urology Surgery, First Hospital Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China
关键词:
经皮肾镜取石术; 肾结石; 输尿管结石; 俯卧分腿位
Keywords:
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Renal calculus; Ureteral calculus; Prone splitleg position
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨俯卧分腿位在经皮肾镜取石术(percutaneous nephrolithotomy，PCNL)中的应用效果。方法2021年 7月~2022年7月我科79例上尿路结石行PCNL，根据手术体位分为俯卧分腿位组35例，传统俯卧位组44例，比较2组手术时间、手术出血量、术后与术前血红蛋白变化、术后并发症、一期结石清除率、住院时间等指标。结果俯卧分腿位组手术时间(69.6±20.7)min，明显短于传统俯卧位组［(90.5±35.3)min，t=-3.280，P=0.002］，一期结石清除率97.1%(34/35)，明显高于传统俯卧位组79.5%(35/44)(χ2=3.984，P=0.037)。俯卧分腿位组术后感染1例，发热3例，出血1例；传统俯卧位组术后发热4例，出血2例，2组并发症发生率差异无显著性(χ2=0.000，P=1.000)。2组手术出血量、工作通道、血红蛋白变化和住院时间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论俯卧分腿位行PCNL能缩短手术时间，提高一期结石清除率，且不会增加术后并发症风险，具有良好的安全性及有效性。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the application effect of prone splitleg position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).MethodsA total of 79 patients with upper urinary tract stones who underwent surgery in our department from July 2021 to July 2022 were selected. According to the surgical position, the patients were divided into prone splitleg position group (n=35) and traditional prone position group (n=44). The two groups were compared regarding operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative and preoperative hemoglobin changes, postoperative complications, onestage stone free rate, and duration of hospitalization.ResultsThe prone splitleg position group had significantly shorter operative time and higher onestage stone free rate than those in the traditional prone position group ［(69.6±20.7) min vs. (90.5±35.3) min, t=-3.280, P=0.002; 97.1% (34/35) vs. 795%(35/44), χ2=3.984, P=0.037］. There were 1 case of infection, 3 cases of fever, and 1 case of bleeding in the prone splitleg position group, while 4 cases of postoperative fever and 2 cases of bleeding in the traditional prone position group, without significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (χ2=0.000, P=1.000). There were no statistical differences in intraoperative blood loss, number of working channel, hemoglobin changes,and duration of hospitalization (P>0.05).ConclusionProne splitleg position PCNL can shorten the operation time, improve the onestage stone free rate, and will not increase the risk of postoperative complications, with good safety and effectiveness.

参考文献/References:

[1]Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, et al. Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers,2016,2:16008.
[2]Zeng G, Mai Z, Xia S, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in China: an ultrasonography based crosssectional study. BJU Int,2017,120(1):109-116.
[3]Mak DK, Smith Y, Buchholz N, et al. What is better in percutaneous nephrolithotomy-Prone or supine? A systematic review. Arab J Urol,2016,14(2):101-107.
[4]Mourmouris P, Berdempes M, Markopoulos T, et al. Patient positioning during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the current best practice? Res Rep Urol,2018,10:189-193.
[5]Falahatkar S, Mokhtari G, Teimoori M. An update on supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A metaanalysis. Urol J,2016,13(5):2814-2822.
[6]Fernstrm I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol,1976,10(3):257-259.
[7]李丹洋,陈军.瞬时X线联合B超在复杂经皮肾镜取石术中的应用体会.临床泌尿外科杂志,2014,29(7):570-572.
[8]Valdivla JG, Scarpa RM, Duvdevani M, et al. Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. J Endourol,2011,25(10):1619-1625.
[9]谢野,唐先圣,唐永玺,等.俯卧分腿位下行硕通镜碎石术治疗肾结石的临床研究.现代医药卫生,2021,37(19):3358-3361.
[10]吴定涛,陈远波.经皮肾镜碎石手术体位的研究进展及临床应用.医学综述,2015,21(16):2970-2972.
[11]苏帅,尹志康,王云龙,等.俯卧分腿位经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗肾结石.中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2018,12(6):364-369.
[12]华小玲,张敏,朱玮,等.分腿俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术的临床效果meta分析.临床泌尿外科杂志,2022,37(12):925-931,936.
[13]张宝勋,蒋胜利,吴文弼,等.经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂肾结石.中国微创外科杂志,2021,21(10):875-878.
[14]卢国平,廖科诚,张志甫.俯卧分腿位一期经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂性铸型结石的临床研究.中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志：电子版,2020,14(4):249-253.
[15]苏帅,尹志康,王云龙,等.俯卧分腿位经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗肾结石.中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2018,12(6):364-369.
[16]王大明,于德新,谢栋栋,等.改良俯卧分腿位双镜联合处理复杂性肾结石合并同侧输尿管结石的临床研究.中华泌尿外科杂志,2019,40(9):685-689.
[17]敖平,束玲,张保朝,等.俯卧分腿一站式体位在经皮肾镜取石术中的应用.皖南医学院学报,2022,41(2):121-124.
[18]Ibarluzea G, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, et al. Supine valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int,2007,100(1):233-236.
[19]AlDessoukey AA, Moussa AS, Abdelbary AM, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the oblique supine lithotomy position and prone position: a comparative study. J Endourol,2014,28(9):1058-1063.
[20]Walick KS, Kragh JE Jr, Ward JA, et al. Changes in intraocular pressure due to surgical positioning: studying potential risk for postoperative vision loss. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2007,32(23):2591-2595.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email：halmurat0903@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-05-03