[1]朱再生** 周鹏飞 施红旗① 应明亮② 薛亚东③ 徐敏 王跃平 胡洋 肖云渊 胡胜晔.保留耻骨膀胱复合体对腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁恢复的影响[J].中国微创外科杂志,2023,01(10):741-745.
　Zhu Zaisheng*,Zhou Pengfei*,Shi Hongqi,et al.Effect of Pubovesical Complexsparing on Recovery of Urinary Incontinence After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2023,01(10):741-745.
点击复制

保留耻骨膀胱复合体对腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁恢复的影响()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2023年10期
页码:
741-745
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Pubovesical Complexsparing on Recovery of Urinary Incontinence After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
作者:
朱再生** 周鹏飞 施红旗① 应明亮② 薛亚东③ 徐敏 王跃平 胡洋 肖云渊 胡胜晔
(浙江大学医学院附属金华医院泌尿外科，金华321000)
Author(s):
Zhu Zaisheng*;  Zhou Pengfei*;  Shi Hongqi;  et al.
*Department of Urology, Jinhua Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua 321000, China
关键词:
前列腺癌; 腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术; 保留耻骨膀胱复合体; 尿失禁
Keywords:
Prostate cancer; Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; Pubovesical complexsparing; Urinary incontinence
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨保留耻骨膀胱复合体的前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁恢复情况。方法2017年6月~2020年6月，将局限性前列腺癌行腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除(laparoscopic radical prostatectomy，LRP)的患者按住院号分为保留耻骨膀胱复合体的观察组(n=53)和未保留的对照组(n=51)。2组年龄、体重指数、前列腺特异性抗原、穿刺活检Gleason评分、前列腺体积等差异无显著性(P>0.05)。均行保留神经的LRP。根据每天使用尿垫数量评估尿失禁恢复情况。尿失禁完全恢复定义：每天使用尿垫0个。拔除导尿管后至少随访12个月。结果拔除导尿管当天(24 h)，1、3、6和12个月尿失禁完全恢复率观察组均明显高于对照组［39.6%(21/53) vs.17.6%(9/51)，P=0.013；66.0%(35/53)vs.35.3%(18/51)，P=0.002；849%(45/53)vs.56.9%(29/51)，P=0.002；92.5%(49/53)vs.70.6%(36/51)，P=0.004；98.1%(52/53)vs.84.3%(43/51)，P=0.031］。结论在LRP手术时，保留耻骨膀胱复合体技术能早期快速改善术后尿失禁，并显著减少远期(术后12个月)尿失禁。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the recovery of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with pubovesical complexsparing.MethodsFrom June 2017 to June 2020, patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) were divided by admission number into an observation group with pubovesical complexsparing (n=53) and a control group without pubovesical complexsparing (n=51). The differences in age, body mass index (BMI), prostatespecific antigen (PSA), Gleason score on puncture biopsy, and prostate volume between the two groups were not significant (P>0.05). All the patients underwent nervepreserving LRP. Recovery from incontinence was assessed based on the number of pads used per day. The definition of complete recovery from urinary incontinence was using of 0 pad per day. Followups were conducted for at least 12 months after catheter removal.ResultsThe rates of complete recovery from urinary incontinence on the day of catheter removal (24 h) and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly higher in the observation group than those in the control group ［396% (21/53) vs. 176% (9/51), P=0013; 660% (35/53) vs 353% (18/51), P=0002; 849% (45/53) vs 569% (29/51), P=0002; 925% (49/53) vs 706% (36/51), P=0004; 981% (52/53) vs 843% (43/51), P=0031］.ConclusionAt the time of LRP surgery, pubovesical complexsparing technique provides early and rapid improvement of postoperative urinary incontinence and significantly reduces longterm incidence (12 months postoperatively) of urinary incontinence.

参考文献/References:

[1]Bray F,Ferlay J,Soerjomataram I,et al.Global cancer statistics 2018:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.CA Cancer J Clin,2018,68(6):394-424.
[2]Ngoo KS,Honda M,Kimura Y,et al.Longitudinal study on the impact of urinary continence and sexual function on healthrelated quality of life among Japanese men after robotassisted radical prostatectomy.Int J Med Robot,2019,15(4):2018.
[3]Passos PS,Anacleto ST,Versos RS,et al.Reconstruction of the Denonvillier’s fascia and posterior ligament of the external urethral sphincter:assessment of its effect on urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Arch Ital Urol Androl,2021,93(3):274-279.
[4]Assem A,Hamdy SM,Beltagy AM,et al.Prospective evaluation of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using a validated questionnaire and daily pad use assessment:which definition is more relevant to the patient’s perception of recovery?Cent European J Urol,2021,74(2):196-200.
[5]Braun A,Washington SL,Cowan JE,et al.Impact of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy on time to intervention,quality of life and work status.Urology,2023 Jul 11:S0090-4295(23)00583-6.Epub ahead of print.
[6]Zattoni F,Artibani W,Patel V,et al.Technical innovations to optimize continence recovery after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.Minerva Urol Nefrol,2019,71(4):324-338.
[7]de Carvalho PA,Barbosa JABA,Guglielmetti GB,et al.Retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle with preservation of dorsal venous complex during robotassisted radical prostatectomy:optimizing functional outcomes.Eur Urol,2020,77(5):628-635.
[8]Qiu X,Li Y,Chen M,et al.Retziussparing robotassisted radical prostatectomy improves early recovery of urinary continence:a randomized,controlled,singleblind trial with a 1year followup.BJU Int,2020,126(5):633-640.
[9]Xuwei L,Chang H,Sihong Z,et al.Denonvilliers’ fascia acts as the fulcrum and hammock for continence after radical prostatectomy.BMC Urol,2021,21:176.
[10]Asimakopoulos A,Annino F,D’ Orazio A,et al.Complete periprostatic anatomy preservation during robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP):the new pubovesical complexsparing technique.Eur Urol,2010,58(3):407-417.
[11]朱再生，施红旗，周鹏飞,等.保留耻骨膀胱复合体技术在腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中的应用.中华泌尿外科杂志,2018,39(7):515-521.
[12]Chen H,Qu M,Lian BJ,et al.Shortterm therapeutic outcomes of roboticassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for oligometastatic prostate cancer:a propensity score matching study.Chin Med J (Engl),2020,133(2):127-133.
[13]叶定伟，谢立平.前列腺癌诊断治疗指南.见:黄健，王建业，孔垂泽,等.2019版中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南.北京:科学出版社,2020.85-133.
[14]Kitamura K,China T,Nagata M,et al.Prediction of recovery time of urinary incontinence following robotassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.Int J Urol,2023,30(1):77-82.
[15]Fukui SJ,Kagebayashi Y,Iemura Y,et al.Simple suturing of the bladder neck muscle layer at the vesicourethral anastomosis site to the dorsal vein complex during anterior reconstruction led to a better postoperative urinary continence after robotassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.Scand J Urol,2020,54(6):470-474.
[16]Tatenuma T,Makiyama K,Ito Y,et al.Correlation of urinary loss rate after catheter removal and longterm urinary continence after robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Int J Urol,2021,28(4):440-443.
[17]Laucirica O,Gomez E,Hajianfar R,et al.Complete puborectalis,puboperinealis muscle and urethral rhabdomyosphincter preservation in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:anatomical landmarks to achieve early urinary continence.Int J Urol,2020,27(6):525-536.
[18]沃奇军，祁小龙，刘锋，等.加速康复外科理念在机器人辅助全腔内STAPLER法根治性膀胱切除术中的初步应用.中华泌尿外科杂志，2020,41(2):95-101.
[19]Sridhar AN,Abozaid M,Rajan P,et al.Surgical techniques to optimize early urinary continence recovery post robot assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.Curr Urol Rep,2017,18(9):71.
[20]Stolzenburg J,Liatsikos E,Rabenalt R,et al.Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy:effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins.Eur Urol,2006,49(1):103-111.
[21]朱再生，施红旗，周鹏飞，等.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术个体化神经保留的探讨.中国微创外科杂志，2020,20(4)：309-313.
[22]Asimakopoulos AD,Topazio L,De Angelis M,et al.Retziussparing versus standard robotassisted radical prostatectomy:a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates.Surg Endosc,2019,33(7):2187-2196.
[23]Phukan C,Mclean A,Nambiar A,et al.Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs.conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy:a systematic review and metaanalysis.World J Urol,2020,38(5):1123-1134.
[24]Moschovas MC,Bhat S,Onol FF,et al.Modified apical dissection and lateral prostatic fascia preservation improves early postoperative functional recovery in roboticassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:results from a propensity scorematched analysis.Eur Urol,2020,78(6):875-884.
[25]Kuroki Y,Harimoto K,Kimura K,et al.Division of dorsal vascular complex using soft coagulation without suture ligation during robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:a propensity scorematched study in a singlecenter experience.Cent European J Urol,2022,75(1):65-71.
[26]HerranzAmo F.Radical retropubic prostatectomy:preservation of urinary continence.Actas Urol Esp(Engl Ed),2020,44(10):674-681.
[27]Vis AN,van der Poel HG,Ruiter AEC,et al.Posterior,anterior,and periurethral surgical reconstruction of urinary continence mechanisms in robotassisted radical prostatectomy:a description and video compilation of commonly performed surgical techniques.Eur Urol,2019,76(6):814-822.
[28]Takenaka A,Hara R,Soga H,et al.A novel technique for approaching the endopelvic fascia in retropubic radical prostatectomy,based on an anatomical study of fixed and fresh cadavers.BJU Int,2005,95(6):766-771.
[29]朱再生,施红旗，周鹏飞,等.前列腺周围盆筋膜内神经网尸体解剖的分布特征.解剖学报,2020,51(5):778-783.
[30]Shin TY,Lee YS.Detrusorrhaphy during robotassisted radical prostatectomy:early recovery of urinary continence and surgical technique.Biomed Res Int,2019,2019:1528142.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：浙江省医药卫生计划项目(2022KY1332)；浙江省金华市(社发类)重大科学技术研究计划项目(2021-3-022)**通讯作者，Email：zaishengzhu@126.com ①病理科 ②医学影像科 ③中心实验室
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-01-08