[1]董政麟 马捷 顾剑华 王祥 金晨 陶海荣**.空心钉联合跗骨窦入路与外侧 L 型入路钢板固定治疗Sanders Ⅱ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的疗效比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2023,01(7):511-516.
　Dong Zhenglin,Ma Jie,Gu Jianhua,et al.Cannulated Screw Combined With Sinus Tarsi Approach Versus Lateral Lshaped Approach Plate Fixation for Sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ Calcaneal Fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2023,01(7):511-516.
点击复制

空心钉联合跗骨窦入路与外侧 L 型入路钢板固定治疗Sanders Ⅱ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的疗效比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2023年7期
页码:
511-516
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Cannulated Screw Combined With Sinus Tarsi Approach Versus Lateral Lshaped Approach Plate Fixation for Sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ Calcaneal Fractures
作者:
董政麟 马捷 顾剑华 王祥 金晨 陶海荣**
(上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院骨科，上海200125)
Author(s):
Dong Zhenglin;  Ma Jie;  Gu Jianhua;  et al.
Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200125, China
关键词:
Sanders Ⅱ型跟骨骨折; Sanders Ⅲ型跟骨骨折; 跗骨窦入路; 外侧 L 型入路
Keywords:
Sanders Ⅱ calcaneal fracture; Sanders Ⅲ calcaneal fracture; Sinus tarsi approach; Lateral Lshaped approach
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨空心钉联合跗骨窦入路钢板固定治疗Sanders Ⅱ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的临床疗效。方法2016年1月~2021年2月我院分别采用空心钉联合跗骨窦入路钢板固定法或外侧L型入路钢板固定法治疗49例Sanders Ⅱ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折，其中空心钉联合跗骨窦入路钢板固定24例（跗骨窦入路组），外侧L型入路钢板固定25例（外侧L型入路组），比较2组手术时间、出血量、开始负重行走时间、疼痛视觉模拟评分（Visual Analogue Scale,VAS）、术后并发症发生率、美国足踝外科学会(American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society，AOFAS)评分、Bhler角和Gissane角矫正情况。结果所有跟骨均恢复解剖形态。跗骨窦入路组患者切口均一期愈合，未发生并发症，外侧L型入路组5例皮肤愈合不良，跗骨窦入路组并发症发生率显著低于外侧L型入路组(Fisher精确检验，P=0.028)。跗骨窦入路组手术时间(t=-4.775，P=0.000)，出血量(t=3.370，P=0.000)，开始负重行走的时间(t=-2.277，P=0.027)，疼痛VAS评分(t=-2.128，P=0.039)，AOFAS评分(t=8.578，P=0000)均显著优于外侧L型入路组。跗骨窦入路组与外侧L型入路组术后6个月Bhler角(t=1.360，P=0.180)和Gissane角(t=0.441，P=0.661)无显著性差异。结论空心钉联合跗骨窦入路钢板固定治疗Sanders Ⅱ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折，复位效果好，创伤小，并发症少。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analyze clinical effect of cannulated screw combined with sinus tarsi approach plate fixation in the treatment of Sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures.MethodsA total of 49 patients with Sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures who were admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to February 2021 were retrospectively studied. There were 24 patients treated with cannulated screw combined with sinus tarsi approach plate fixation (study group) and 25 patients treated with lateral Lshaped approach plate fixation (control group). The operation time, blood loss, time to start weightbearing walking, visual analogue scale (VAS), incidence of postoperative complications, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Bhler angle and Gissane angle were observed and compared between the two groups.ResultsThe calcaneus recovered to anatomical shape in all the cases. The wounds of the patients in the study group healed up by first intention without other complications, while there were 5 cases of poor skin healing in the control group. The incidence of complications in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (Fisher’s exact test, P=0.028). The operation time (t=-4775, P=0.000), blood loss (t=3.370, P=0.000), time to start weightbearing walking (t=-2.277, P=0.027), VAS score (t=-2.128, P=0.039) and AOFAS score (t=8.578, P=0000) in the study group were significantly better than those in the control group. There were no significant differences in Bhler angle (t=1.360, P=0.180) and Gissane angle (t=0.441, P=0661) between the study group and the control group at 6 months after operation.ConclusionCannulated screw combined with sinus tarsi approach plate fixation in the treatment of Sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures has good reduction effect, less trauma and fewer complications.

参考文献/References:

[1]Mitchell MJ, Mckinley JC, Robinson CM. The epidemiology of calcaneal fractures. Foot (Edinb),2009,19(4):197-200.
[2]Wallin KJ, Cozzetto D, Russell L, et al. Evidencebased rationale for percutaneous fixation technique of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review of clinical outcomes. J Foot Ankle Surg,2014,53(6):740-743.
[3]王文强,白梅.跟骨外侧小切口联合跗骨窦间隙切口微创治疗跟骨骨折.实用骨科杂志,2016,22(5):454-456.
[4]袁炜庆,杨渊.游离腓骨复合组织瓣修复足部骨与软组织缺损九例.中华显微外科杂志,2021,44(6):659-662.
[5]俞光荣,燕晓宇.跟骨骨折治疗方法的选择.中华骨科杂志,2006,26(2):134-141.
[6]Backes M, Spierings KE, Dingemans SA, et al. Evaluation and quantification of geographical differences in wound complication rates following the extended lateral approach in displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures-A systematic review of the literature. Injury,2017,48(10):2329-2335.
[7]Backes M, Spijkerman IJ, De MuinckKeizer RO, et al. Determination of pathogens in postoperative wound infection after surgically reduced calcaneal fractures and implications for prophylaxis and treatment. J Foot Ankle Surg,2018,57(1):100-103.
[8]吴旻昊,孙文超,闫飞飞,等.经微创跗骨窦切口入路与传统外侧L形切口入路比较治疗跟骨骨折的Meta分析.中国骨伤,2017,30(12):1118-1126.
[9]Sanders R. Displaced intraarticular fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2000,82(2):225-250.
[10]Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, et al. Clinical rating systems for the anklehindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int,1994,15(7):349-353.
[11]Lau BC, Allahabadi S, Palanca A, et al. Understanding radiographic measurements used in foot and ankle surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2022,30(2):e139-e154.
[12]李云鹏,张路,赵文志.经跗骨窦切口入路治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的疗效分析.大连医科大学学报,2018,40(1):33-38,46.
[13]Lv Y, Zhou YF, Li L, et al. Sinus tarsi approach versus the extended lateral approach for displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2021,141(10):1659-1667.
[14]Van Hoeve S, Poeze M. Outcome of minimally invasive open and percutaneous techniques for repair of calcaneal fractures: A systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg,2016,55(6):1256-1263.
[15]苏日宝,王培吉,谷云峰,等.鸟嘴型跟骨骨折术后软组织坏死的显微外科修复八例.中华显微外科杂志,2019,42(1):21-25.
[16]廉养杰.跗骨窦切口空心螺钉内固定治疗对SandersⅢ型跟骨骨折患者Bohler角、Gissane角、跟骨高度与宽度的影响.实用临床医药杂志,2019,23(2):14-17.
[17]Mehta CR, An VVG, Phan K, et al. Extensile lateral versus sinus tarsi approach for displaced, intraarticular calcaneal fractures: a metaanalysis. J Orthop Surg Res,2018,13(1):243.
[18]陈超,陈庚,钱增杰,等.跟骨外侧骨皮瓣入路与传统L形入路治疗Sanders Ⅲ～Ⅳ型跟骨骨折的比较.创伤外科杂志,2017,19(10):770-773.
[19]吴荣,闵继康,黄曙峰,等.跗骨窦联合外侧纵形切口与传统外侧L型切口治疗Sanders Ⅱ型跟骨骨折的比较研究.创伤外科杂志,2017,19(11):834-839.
[20]潘永雄,洪劲松,付小勇,等.经跗骨窦切口与经外侧L型切口治疗跟骨骨折在内侧壁与跟骨力线的比较研究.中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(12):1095-1100.
[21]Amani A, Shakeri V, Kamali A. Comparison of calcaneus joint internal and external fractures in open surgery and minimal invasive methods in patients. Eur J Transl Myol,2018,28(2):7352.
[22]Giannini S, Cadossi M, Mosca M, et al. Minimallyinvasive treatment of calcaneal fractures: A review of the literature and our experience. Injury,2016,47(Suppl 4):S138-S146.
[23]Khazen G, Rassi CK. Sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures: The new gold standard? Foot Ankle Clin,2020,25(4):667-681.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：国家重点研发项目（2020YFB1711505）**通讯作者，Email:taohair@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-10-10