[1]崔增桢 许翔宇 曹源 范吉星 田耘 周方 吕扬*.4枚不平行空心螺钉与3枚平行空心螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效对比[J].中国微创外科杂志,2023,01(6):449-455.
　Cui Zengzhen,Xu Xiangyu,Cao Yuan,et al.Comparison of Four Nonparallel Cannulated Screws and Three Parallel Cannulated Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2023,01(6):449-455.
点击复制

4枚不平行空心螺钉与3枚平行空心螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效对比()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2023年6期
页码:
449-455
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Four Nonparallel Cannulated Screws and Three Parallel Cannulated Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture
作者:
崔增桢 许翔宇 曹源 范吉星 田耘 周方 吕扬*
(北京大学第三医院骨科骨与关节精准医学教育部工程研究中心，北京100191)
Author(s):
Cui Zengzhen;  Xu Xiangyu;  Cao Yuan;  et al.
Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital; Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China
关键词:
股骨颈骨折; 空心螺钉; 非滑动固定
Keywords:
Femoral neck fractures; Cannulated screws; Nonsliding fixation
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的比较4枚空心螺钉(four cannulated screws，FCS)与3枚空心螺钉(three cannulated screws，TCS)治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析我科2018年1月~2020年4月117例股骨颈骨折的临床资料，根据手术方法分为TCS组(n=64)和FCS组(n=53)，按照Garden分型进行亚组分析，比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、股骨颈短缩长度(length of femoral neck shortening，LFNS)、大腿软组织刺激症状(soft tissue irritation of the thigh，STIT)、术后24个月Harris髋关节评分和内固定失败情况。结果所有患者术后随访24~32个月，中位随访时间24个月。非移位型骨折2个亚组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、内固定失败率(internal fixation failure rate，IFFR)、STIT发生率和术后24个月Harris髋关节评分均无统计学差异(P>0.05)，FCS组LFNS更小［1.9(0.3，3.5)mm vs. 2.5(1.6，3.5)mm，Z=-2.112，P=0.035］。移位型骨折2个亚组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间和IFFR均无统计学差异(P>0.05)，FCS组术后1年LFNS更小［1.2(0.3，4.0)mm vs. 5.7(2.1，9.3)mm，Z=-3.077，P=0.002］，STIT发生率更低［12.0%(3/25)vs. 50.0%(8/16)， χ2=5371，P=0020］，术后24个月Harris髋关节评分中位数明显高于TCS组［91.0(86.5，94.5)分vs. 89.0(74.0，91.8)分，Z=-2.064，P=0.040］。2组均未发生股骨头坏死等并发症。结论FCS与TCS治疗股骨颈骨折IFFR无明显差异，但FCS可以有效减小术后LFNS，使移位型骨折患者获得更佳的髋关节功能。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare clinical efficacy of four cannulated screws (FCS) and three cannulated screws (TCS) in the treatment of femoral neck fracture.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 117 patients with femoral neck fracture admitted to our department from January 2018 to April 2020. According to surgical methods, the patients were divided into TCS group (n=64) and FCS group (n=53). The subgroup analysis was conducted according to the Garden classification. The operation time, blood loss, hospitalization time, length of femoral neck shortening (LFNS), soft tissue irritation of the thigh (STIT), Harris hip score, and internal fixation failure rate (IFFR) were compared between the two groups.ResultsAll the patients were followed up for 24-32 months, with a median of 24 months. For undisplaced fractures, the subgroup analysis had no significant differences in the operation time, blood loss, hospitalization time, IFFR, STIT, or Harris hip score (P>0.05). The 1year LFNS was lower in the FCS group with statistically significant difference ［19 (0.3, 3.5) mm vs. 2.5 (1.6, 3.5) mm, Z=-2.112, P=0.035］. For displaced fractures, the subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in the operation time, blood loss, hospitalization time, and IFFR (P>0.05). The LFNS was lower in the FCS group with statistically significant difference ［12 (0.3, 4.0) vs. 5.7 (2.1, 9.3) mm, Z=-3.077, P=0.002］. The STIT rate was lower in the FCS group with statistically significant difference ［12.0%(3/25) vs. 50.0%(8/16), χ2=5.371, P=0020］. The Harris hip score was significantly higher in the FCS group ［910 (86.5, 94.5) points vs. 89.0 (74.0, 91.8) points, Z=-2.064, P=0040］. There were no complications such as femoral head necrosis in both groups.ConclusionThere is no significant difference between FCS and TCS in terms of IFFR in the treatment of femoral neck fracture, but FCS can effectively reduce the degree of postoperative LFNS and enable patients to obtain better hip function.

参考文献/References:

[1]郭永智,王晓伟,刘智,等.老年骨质疏松性髋部骨折风险预测.中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2012,27(10):879-881.
[2]赵海涛,陈伟,王娟,等.2010年至2011年东部沿海与西部内陆地区成人股骨颈骨折的流行病学对比分析.中华创伤骨科杂志,2015,17(8):704-708.
[3]Grund S, Roos M, Duchene W, et al. Treatment in a center for geriatric traumatology. Dtsch Arztebl Int,2015,112(7):113-119.
[4]Ahmad T, Ashraf U, Irfan O, et al. Trends in management of neck of femur fracture. J Pak Med Assoc,2015,65(11 Suppl 3):S163-S165.
[5]Davidovitch RI, Jordan CJ, Egol KA, et al. Challenges in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the nonelderly adult. J trauma,2010,68(1):236-242.
[6]Fixation using alternative implants for the treatment of hip fractures (FAITH) investigators. Fracture fixation in the operative management of hip fractures (FAITH): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet,2017,389(10078):1519-1527.
[7]Florschutz AV, Langford JR, Haidukewych GJ, et al. Femoral neck fractures: current management. J Orthop Trauma,2015,29(3):121-129.
[8]Felton J, Slobogean GP, Jackson SS, et al. Femoral neck shortening after hip fracture fixation is associated with inferior hip function: Results from the FAITH trial. J Orthop Trauma,2019,33(10):487-496.
[9]Slobogean GP, Stockton DJ, Zeng BF, et al. Femoral neck shortening in adult patients under the age of 55 years is associated with worse functional outcomes: Analysis of the prospective multicenter study of hip fracture outcomes in China (SHOC). Injury,2017,48(8):1837-1842.
[10]Guimares JAM, Rocha LR, Noronha Rocha TH, et al. Vertical femoral neck fractures in young adults: a closed fixation strategy using a transverse cancellous lag screw. Injury,2017,48(Suppl 4):S10-S16.
[11]Dong Q, Han Z, Zhang YG, et al. Comparison of transverse cancellous lag screw and ordinary cannulated screw fixations in treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures. Orthop Surg,2019, 11(4):595-603.
[12]Haq RU, Manhas V, Pankaj A, et al. Proximal femoral nails compared with reverse distal femoral locking plates in intertrochanteric fractures with a compromised lateral wall; a randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop,2014,38(7):1443-1449.
[13]Aktselis I, Kokoroghiannis C, Fragkomichalos E, et al. Prospective randomised controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Int Orthop,2014,38(1):155-161.
[14]Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An endresult study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am,51(4):737-755.
[15]王子越,董启榕,徐又佳,等.人工股骨头置换与内固定治疗高龄患者无移位型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较.中华创伤骨科杂志,2016,18(5):369-374.
[16]孙振辉,刘月驹,李衡.髋关节置换与内固定术治疗老年移位型股骨颈骨折术后再手术率和并发症的系统评价.中华创伤骨科杂志,2014,16(2):115-121.
[17]Heetveld MJ, Rogmark C, Frihagen F, et al. Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: what is the evidence? J Orthop Trauma,2009,23(6):395-402.
[18]Lee YS, Huang CR, Liao WY. Surgical treatment of undisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Int Orthop,2007,31(5):677-682.
[19]Parker MJ, Porter KM, Eastwood DM, et al. Intracapsular fractures of the neck of femur. Parallel or crossed garden screws? J Bone Joint Surg Br,1991,73(5):826-827.
[20]Yang JJ, Lin LC, Chao KH, et al. Risk factors for nonunion in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with three cannulated screws placed in either a triangle or an inverted triangle configuration. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2013,95(1):61-69.
[21]Zlowodzki M, Ayeni O, Petrisor BA, et al. Femoral neck shortening after fracture fixation with multiple cancellous screws: incidence and effect on function ［published correction appears in J Trauma.2015 Oct;79(4):704.Ayieni,Olufemi ［corrected to Ayeni, Olufemi］］. J Trauma,2008,64(1):163-169.
[22]Gupta S, Pal B, New AM. The effects of interfacial conditions and stem length on potential failure mechanisms in the uncemented resurfaced femur. Ann Biomed Eng,2010,38(6):2107-2120.
[23]Zhao F, Guo L, Wang X, et al. Analysis on risk factors for neck shortening after internal fixation for Pauwels Ⅱ femoral neck fracture in young patients. Eur J Med Res,26(1):59-65.
[24]Zlowodzki M, Brink O, Switzer J, et al. The effect of shortening and varus collapse of the femoral neck on function after fixation of intracapsular fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2008,90-B(11):1487-1494.
[25]Liu JF, Wang TL, Ge S, et al. Configuration of short and longthreaded cannulated screws in proximal femoral plating decreases varus collapse of femoral neck fractures: A retrospective cohort study. Injury,2021,52(8):2384-2389.
[26]Shu DP, Xiao YP, Bei MJ, et al. Dynamic compression locking system versus multiple cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2020,21(1):230.
[27]Boraiah S, Paul O, Hammoud S, et al. Predictable healing of femoral neck fractures treated with intraoperative compression and lengthstable implants. J Trauma,2010,69(1):142-147.
[28]Okcu G, zkayn N, Erkan S, et al. Should full threaded compression screws be used in adult femoral neck fractures? Injury,2015,46(Suppl 2):S24-S28.
[29]Bray TJ. Femoral neck fracture fixation. Clinical decision making. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1997, (339):20-31.
[30]Wang Y, Ma JX, Yin T, et al. Correlation between reduction quality of femoral neck fracture and femoral head necrosis based on biomechanics. Orthop Surg,2019,11(2):318-324.
[31]Kumar S, Bharti A, Rawat A, et al. Comparative study of fresh femoral neck fractures managed by multiple cancellous screws with and without fibular graft in young adults. J Clin Orthop Trauma,2015,6(1):6-11.
[32]夏希,刘智.老年股骨颈骨折空心螺钉固定术后颈短缩的测量及其对髋关节功能的影响.中华创伤骨科杂志,2014,16(8):651-655.
[33]李伟龙,余霄,庞清江.股骨颈骨折内固定术后股骨颈短缩的相关研究进展.中华骨科杂志,2016,36(6):378-384.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email：lvyang42@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-09-07