[1]刘威 沈根海** 高泉根 王刚.全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术与开放手术治疗女性腹股沟疝的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2023,01(5):354-358.
　Liu Wei,Shen Genhai,Gao Quangen,et al.Comparison of Totally Extraperitoneal Repair and Open Surgery for Female Inguinal Hernia[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2023,01(5):354-358.
点击复制

全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术与开放手术治疗女性腹股沟疝的比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2023年5期
页码:
354-358
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Totally Extraperitoneal Repair and Open Surgery for Female Inguinal Hernia
作者:
刘威 沈根海** 高泉根 王刚
(江苏省苏州市第九人民医院微创普外科， 苏州215200)
Author(s):
Liu Wei;  Shen Genhai;  Gao Quangen;  et al.
Department of Minimally Invasive General Surgery, Suzhou Ninth People’s Hospital, Suzhou 215200, China
关键词:
腹股沟疝; 全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术; 腹膜前疝修补术; 子宫圆韧带
Keywords:
Inguinal hernia; Totally extraperitoneal hernia repair; Preperitoneal herniorrhaphy; Uterine round ligament
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术(totally extraperitoneal repair，TEP)治疗女性腹股沟疝的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2016年1月~2022年5月105例女性腹膜前疝修补术的临床资料，其中63例行TEP(腔镜组)，42例行经腹股沟前入路腹膜前疝修补术(开放组)，比较2组手术指标和随访结果。结果2组均顺利完成手术，腔镜组6例术中探查发现对侧隐匿疝，同期修补。双侧疝腔镜组手术时间较开放组短［(102.7±14.6)min (n=30) vs. (113.4±12.8)min(n=13)，t=-2.285，P=0.028］，单侧疝手术时间2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腔镜组术后24 h疼痛视觉模拟评分(Visual Analogue Scale，VAS)、术后住院时间、异物感发生率优于开放组［(2.2±0.4)分vs.(2.6±0.7)分，t=-3.481，P=0001；(71±2.4)d vs.(10.7±3.5)d，t=-5.841，P=0.000；7.9%(5/63) vs. 23.8%(10/42), χ2=5.185，P=0.023］。2组术中出血量、术后血清肿发生率和术后复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对于女性腹股沟疝，TEP和经腹股沟前入路腹膜前疝修补术均安全且疗效显著。TEP可及时发现对侧隐匿疝，保留子宫圆韧带完整性，且具有双侧手术时间短、术后疼痛轻、住院时间短等优点。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of totally extraperitoneal hernia repair（TEP） in the treatment of female inguinal hernia.MethodsClinical results of 105 cases of female inguinal hernia in our hospital from January 2016 to May 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 63 cases treated with totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (laparoscopic group) and 42 cases with preperitoneal herniorrhaphy via anterior inguinal approach (open group). The operative indexes and followup results of the two groups were compared.ResultsThe operations were successfully completed in all the patients. There were 6 cases in the laparoscopic group found the occult hernia on the other side by intraoperative examination, which were repaired at the same time. For bilateral female inguinal hernia, the operation time of the laparoscopic group was shorter than that of open group ［(102.7±14.6) min (n=30) vs. (113.4±12.8) min (n=13), t=-2.285, P=0.028］. However, the operation time of unilateral inguinal hernia had no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The laparoscopic group was superior to the open group in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores of postoperative 24 h pain, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of foreign body sensation ［(2.2±0.4) points vs. (2.6±0.7) points, t=-3.481, P=0.001; (7.1±2.4) d vs. (10.7±3.5) d, t=-5.841, P=0.000; 7.9% (5/63) vs. 23.8% (10/42), χ2=5.185, P=0.023］. There was no significant difference in terms of intraoperative blood loss, incidence of seroma, and recurrence rate (P>0.05).ConclusionsFor female inguinal hernia, totally extraperitoneal hernia repair and preperitoneal herniorrhaphy via anterior inguinal approach are both safe and effective. Totally extraperitoneal hernia repair has obvious advantages in detecting occult hernia in time, preserving the continuity of uterine round ligament, shortening operation time for bilateral inguinal hernia, reducing postoperative pain, and shortening postoperative hospital stay.

参考文献/References:

[1]Simons MP,Aufenacker T,BayNielsen M,et al.European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.Hernia,2009,13(4):343-403.
[2]中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组,大中华腔镜疝外科学院.腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化操作指南(2017版).中国实用外科杂志,2017,37(11):1238-1242.
[3]董天雄,余壮明.TAPP和Kugel术式治疗成人腹股沟疝的对比研究.中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2019,13(5):485-488.
[4]Oma E,BayNielsen M,Jensen KK,et al.Primary ventral or groin hernia in pregnancy:a cohort study of 20,714 women.Hernia,2017,21(3):335-339.
[5]茹东跃,陈德兴.腹膜前间隙解剖结构在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用.中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(12):1111-1113.
[6]卢寅，吴立胜.腹股沟疝手术中子宫圆韧带处理研究进展.中国实用外科杂志,2020,40(7):858-860.
[7]Kckerling F,Lorenz R,Hukauf M,et al.Influencing factors on the outcome in female groin hernia repair:a registrybased multivariable analysis of 15,601 patients.Ann Surg,2019,270(1):1-9.
[8]刘书强,梁志宏,华伟,等.腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝合并子宫圆韧带囊肿.中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(6):567-569.
[9]唐健雄,李绍杰,黄磊.我国腹股沟疝手术规范化和质量控制存在的问题及对策.中国实用外科杂志,2018,38(1):72-74.
[10]Bellier A,Cavalié G,Marnas G,et al.The round ligament of the uterus:questioning its distal insertion.Morphologie,2018,337(2):55-60.
[11]王骥,王文瑞,李健文,等.腹腔镜手术治疗女性腹股沟疝225例临床分析.中国实用外科杂志,2015,35(11):1220-1222.
[12]Schmidt L,berg S,Andresen K,et al.Recurrence rates after repair of inguinal hernia in women:a systematic review.JAMA Surg,2018,153(12):1135-1142.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：苏州市科技发展计划(SYSD2018041)**通讯作者，Email：wjshengh@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-08-10