[1]韩孝洲** 刘剑新 张勇 田长海 刘旺 胡华军.免膀胱镜简易方法的输尿管支架管取出[J].中国微创外科杂志,2022,01(9):728-732.
　Han Xiaozhou,Liu Jianxin,Zhang Yong,et al.A Simple Procedure for Removing Ureteral Stents Without Systoscope[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2022,01(9):728-732.
点击复制

免膀胱镜简易方法的输尿管支架管取出()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2022年9期
页码:
728-732
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-01-13

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Simple Procedure for Removing Ureteral Stents Without Systoscope
作者:
韩孝洲** 刘剑新 张勇 田长海 刘旺 胡华军
(上海中医药大学附属上海市中西医结合医院泌尿外科，上海200082)
Author(s):
Han Xiaozhou;  Liu Jianxin;  Zhang Yong;  et al.
Department of Urology, Shanghai TCMintegrated Hospital, Shanghai University of TCM, Shanghai 200082, China
关键词:
免膀胱镜; 输尿管支架
Keywords:
Without systoscope; Ureteral stent
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨一种免膀胱镜的简易拔管方法取出输尿管支架管(双J管)的可行性。方法回顾性分析2020年9月~2022年2月输尿管镜碎石术后留置单侧双J管179例的资料，患者选择拔管方式，简易组95例，用F10胃管和0号聚丙烯滑线带出双J管，膀胱镜组84例，常规行膀胱镜双J管取出术。比较2组拔管成功率、拔管时间、治疗费用、术后不适症状(膀胱刺激和肉眼血尿)发生率。结果简易组男、女性拔管成功率分别为98.4%(60/61)和100%(34/34)，膀胱镜组男、女性拔管成功率均为100%(55/55和29/29)，2组差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。与膀胱镜组相比，简易组男、女性拔管时间更短［(4.1±0.9)min vs. (5.2±1.0)min，(3.1±0.8)min vs. (4.1±1.2)min，均P=0.000］，治疗费用更少［(249.2±135.3)元vs.(1248.7±202.4)元，(233.3±32.4)元vs.(1200.4±178.7)元，均P=0.000］，男性膀胱刺激症状和术后不适症状总发生率更低［9.8%(6/61) vs. 27.3%(15/55)，P=0.015；13.1%(8/61)vs. 32.7%(18/55)，P=0.011］。结论免膀胱镜简易方法行双J管取出简便、安全、有效，医疗费用低，术后并发症少，可以在临床中应用。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of a novel noncystoscopic simple procedure to remove ureteral stents.MethodsClinical data of 179 patients with unilateral double J tube indwelling after ureteroscopic lithotripsy from September 2020 to February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The method of extubation was selected by patients. The double J tube was removed with F10 gastric tube and No. 0 polypropylene suture in 95 patients (simple group), while routinely removed with cystoscopy in 84 patients (cystoscopy group). The success rate of extubation, extubation time, treatment expenses and the incidence of postoperative discomfort (bladder irritation and gross hematuria) were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe success rate of extubation in the simple group was 98.4% (60/61) and 100% (34/34) for men and women, respectively, and 100% (55/55) and 100% (29/29) in the cystoscopy group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (both P>0.05). Compared with the cystoscopy group, the extubation time for men and women in the simple group was shorter ［(4.1±0.9) min vs. (5.2±1.0) min, (3.1±0.8) min vs. (4.1±1.2) min, both P=0.000］, the treatment expenses for men and women was less ［(249.2±135.3) yuan vs. (1248.7±202.4) yuan, (233.3±32.4) yuan vs. (1200.4±178.7) yuan, both P=0.000］, and the incidence of bladder irritation and total postoperative discomfort for men was lower ［9.8% (6/61) vs. 27.3% (15/55), P=0.015; 13.1% (8/61) vs. 32.7% (18/55), P=0.011］.ConclusionUsing simple procedure without cystoscope to remove the ureteral stent is convenient, safe, effective, and cost efficient, with less postoperative complications, which is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]王凯,陈林,何平林,等.输尿管狭窄的微创治疗进展.现代泌尿外科杂志,2019,24(5):413-416,420.
[2]Sarica K,Eryildirim B,Akdere H,et al.Predictive value of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) assessment on the success of internal ureteral stent insertion in cases with obstructing ureteral calculi.Urolithiasis,2021,49(4): 359-365.
[3]尿路感染诊断与治疗中国专家共识编写组.尿路感染诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2015版).尿路感染抗菌药物选择策略及特殊类型尿路感染的治疗建议.中华泌尿外科杂志，2015，36(4):245-248.
[4]Lin H,Xu M,Jiang D,et al.Noncystoscopic removal of retained ureteral stents with mild sedation in children.Urology,2016,94:255-258.
[5]张玉波，陈莺，姜大朋.输尿管内支架管简易拔除方法在儿童患者中的应用效果.现代泌尿外科杂志,2017,22(1):29-32.
[6]崔澍,许长宝,赵兴华,等.Allium覆膜输尿管支架治疗良恶性输尿管狭窄20例.中国微创外科杂志,2021,21(10):889-893.
[7]瞿曦，李先林.腹腔镜输尿管镜双镜联合技术与输尿管成形术治疗输尿管狭窄的疗效及安全性.实用医学杂志,2020,36(4):461-465．
[8]Fokdal L,Tanderup K,Potter R,et al.Risk factors for ureteral stricture after radiochemotherapy including image guided adaptive brachytherapy in cervical cancer:results from the EMBRACE studies.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2019,103(4):887-894．
[9]Kim JH,Park SY,Kim MG,et al.Pain and satisfaction during rigid cystoscopic ureteral stent removal:a preliminary study.BMC Urol,2014,14(1):90.
[10]金重睿，撒应龙，张炯，等.膀胱软镜在骨盆骨折后尿道狭窄患者中的应用及疼痛耐受性研究.中国内镜杂志，2017,23(1):15-19.
[11]CanoGarcia MC,CasaresPerez R,ArrabalMartin M,et al.Use of lidocaine 2% gel does not reduce pain during flexible cystoscopy and is not costeffective.Urol J,2015,12(5):2362-2365.
[12]Barros AA,Oliveira C,Ribeiro AJ,et al.In vivo assessment of a novel biodegradable ureteral stent.World J Urol,2018,36(2):277-283.
[13]杨刚刚，陈方，谢华.生物可降解输尿管支架管研究进展.中国医疗设备,2017,32(2)：16-19.
[14]肖世伟，李亚楠，刘军，等.可降解输尿管支架管的研究进展.中华泌尿外科杂志,2018,39(1):76-78.
[15]肖忠慧.双J管内引流术治疗肾积水的临床分析.中国卫生标准管理，2015，6(20)：42-43.
[16]Althaus AB,Li K,Pattison E,et al.Rate of dislodgment of ureteral stents when using an extraction string after endoscopic urological surgery.J Urol,2015,193(6):2011-2014.
[17]曾兆慧，郑小青，延敏博，等.免膀胱镜拔出输尿管支架：只多要一条快微乔线和一条丝线.中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2020,14(3):189-191.
[18]刘冬，邓骁征，苏泽礼，等.简易装置在小儿输尿管支架管取出术中的应用研究.宁夏医学杂志,2020,42(12):1070-1072.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：上海市卫生健康委员会卫生行业临床研究专项(201940426)；上海市虹口区卫生健康委员会医学科研专项(虹卫2102-03)**通讯作者，Email：hanxzh@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-01-13