[1]许世东 张景贺 邢建强 田霖 窦永峰*.单侧双通道内镜与椎间孔镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症的近期疗效比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2022,01(9):712-716.
　Xu Shidong,Zhang Jinghe,Xing Jianqiang,et al.Comparative Study of Shortterm Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy and Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Unilateral Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2022,01(9):712-716.
点击复制

单侧双通道内镜与椎间孔镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症的近期疗效比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2022年9期
页码:
712-716
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-01-13

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative Study of Shortterm Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy and Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Unilateral Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
作者:
许世东 张景贺 邢建强 田霖 窦永峰*
(滨州医学院附属医院脊柱外科，滨州256603)
Author(s):
Xu Shidong;  Zhang Jinghe;  Xing Jianqiang;  et al.
Department of Spine Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Binzhou 256603, China
关键词:
经皮椎间孔镜; 腰椎管狭窄症; 单侧双通道内镜
Keywords:
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Unilateral biportal endoscopy
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的比较单侧双通道内镜(unilateral biportal endoscopy，UBE)和经皮椎间孔镜(percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy，PELD)治疗单侧症状腰椎管狭窄症的近期疗效。方法回顾性分析2019年10月~2020年10月共98例单侧症状腰椎管狭窄症资料，按患者意愿，其中57例选择局麻下PELD，41例选择全麻下UBE。比较2组手术时间、术后并发症、术后卧床时间，术前及术后1天、1个月、12个月疼痛视觉模拟评分(Visual Analogue Scale，VAS)，术前及术后1个月、12个月Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry Disability Index，ODI)，术后1年以改良MacNab标准评价疗效。结果2组均顺利完成手术，2组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。PELD组术后卧床时间更短［(0.2±0.3)h vs. (6.3±0.4)h，t=-86.819，P=0.000］，下肢深静脉血栓形成(deep vein thrombosis，DVT)发生率更低［1.8%(1/57) vs. 14.6%(6/41), χ2=4.181，P=0041］。2组术后VAS评分和ODI均较术前显著改善(P<0.05)，2组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组术后12个月优良率差异无统计学意义［97.6%（40/41） vs. 98.2%(56/57),P=1.000］。结论UBE和PELD均为治疗单侧症状腰椎管狭窄症的有效手术方式，PELD并发症更少。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the shortterm clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for the treatment of unilateral symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 98 cases of unilateral symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis from October 2019 to October 2020. According to the wishes of patients, PELD was performed in 57 cases under local anesthesia and UBE was applied in 41 cases under general anesthesia. The operation time, postoperative complications, and postoperative bed rest time were compared. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before operation, and one day, one month and 12 months after operation were compared. The curative effect was evaluated by the modified MacNab criteria one year after operation.ResultsThe operation was successfully completed in both groups. There was no significant difference in operation time (P>0.05). The postoperative bed rest time was shorter in the PELD group than the UBE group ［(0.2±0.3) h vs. (6.3±0.4) h, t=-86.819, P=0.000］. The incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis was lower in the PELD group than the UBE group ［1.8% (1/57) vs. 14.6% (6/41), χ2=4181, P=0.041］. The VAS scores and ODI after operation were significantly improved in both groups as compared with those before operation (P<0.05), without significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate between the two groups 12 months after operation ［97.6% (40/41) vs. 98.2% (56/57), P=1.000］.ConclusionBoth UBE and PELD are effective surgical methods for the treatment of unilateral symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis, and PELD has fewer complications.

参考文献/References:

[1]Ma XL,Zhao XW,Ma JX,et al.Effectiveness of surgery versus conservative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis:a system review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.Int J Surg,2017,44:329-338.
[2]Kim M,Lee S,Kim HS,et al.A comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation in the Korean:a metaanalysis. Biomed Res Int,2018,2018:9073460.
[3]Kim JE,Choi DJ,Park EJJ,et al.Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.Asian Spine J,2019,13(2):334-342.
[4]Lv Z,Jin L,Wang K,et al. Comparison of effects of PELD and fenestration in the treatment of geriatric lumbar lateral recess stenosis.Clin Interv Aging,2019,14:2187-2194.
[5]《中国血栓性疾病防治指南》专家委员会.中国血栓性疾病防治指南.中华医学杂志,2018,98(36):2861-2888.
[6]彭斌,吴波.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018.中华神经科杂志,2018,51(9):666-682.
[7]Pao JL.A Review of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.Int J Spine Surg,2021,15(suppl 3):S65-S71.
[8]Jiang S,Li Q,Wang H.Comparison of the clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and traditional laminectomy in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.Medicine (Baltimore),2021,100(30):e25806.
[9]Liu X,Yuan S,Tian Y,et al.Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy,microendoscopic discectomy,and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation:minimum 2year followup results.J Neurosurg Spine,2018,28(3):317-325.
[10]Jiang HW,Chen CD,Zhan BS,et al.Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation:a retrospective study.J Orthop Surg Res,2022,17(1):30.
[11]Zhu W,Yao Y,Hao J,et al.Shortterm postoperative pain and function of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for singlesegment lumbar disc herniation:a systematic review and metaanalysis.Appl Bionics Biomech,2022,2022:5360277.
[12]Abudurexiti T,Qi L,Muheremu A,et al.Microendoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic surgery for lumbar disk herniation.J Int Med Res,2018,46(9):3910-3917.
[13]Chen L,Zhu B,Zhong HZ,et al.The learning curve of unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) spinal surgery by CUSUM analysis.Front Surg,2022,9:873691.
[14]Jiang S,Li Q,Wang H.Comparison of the clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and traditional laminectomy in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.Medicine (Baltimore),2021,100(30):e25806.
[15]李冬月,杨晋才,海涌.经皮椎间孔镜下减压治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症.中国矫形外科杂志,2019,27(15):1360-1364.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email:afinedou@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-01-13