[1]孔祥如* 姜伟 单宇宙 孙健宁 刘旭 钱玉 杨春 杨太明.微创复位联合Jail螺钉技术固定治疗孤立性胫骨平台后外侧塌陷骨折[J].中国微创外科杂志,2022,01(12):945-951.
　Kong Xiangru,Jiang Wei,Shan Yuzhou,et al.Treatment of Isolated Posterolateral Tibial Plateau Collapse Fractures With Minimally Invasive Reduction and Jail Screw Fixation Technique[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2022,01(12):945-951.
点击复制

微创复位联合Jail螺钉技术固定治疗孤立性胫骨平台后外侧塌陷骨折()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2022年12期
页码:
945-951
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-03-13

文章信息/Info

Title:
Treatment of Isolated Posterolateral Tibial Plateau Collapse Fractures With Minimally Invasive Reduction and Jail Screw Fixation Technique
作者:
孔祥如* 姜伟 单宇宙 孙健宁 刘旭 钱玉 杨春 杨太明
(徐州医科大学附属宿迁医院南京鼓楼医院集团宿迁医院骨科，宿迁223800)
Author(s):
Kong Xiangru;  Jiang Wei;  Shan Yuzhou;  et al.
Department of Orthopedics, Suqian Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Suqian Hospital of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group, Suqian 223800, China
关键词:
胫骨平台骨折; 后外侧骨折; Jail螺钉技术; 骨折固定术
Keywords:
Tibial plateau fracture; Posterolateral fracture; Jail screw technique; Fracture fixation
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨经骨隧道微创复位联合Jail螺钉技术固定治疗孤立性胫骨平台后外侧塌陷骨折的临床疗效。方法2016年10月~2020年10月我科对25例孤立性胫骨平台后外侧塌陷骨折应用Mimics20.0软件行术前规划，术中经胫骨骨隧道空心顶棒锤击复位胫骨平台后外侧塌陷骨折，Jail螺钉固定。比较术前、术后第2天及术后1年胫骨平台关节面塌陷距离、胫骨平台后倾角(posterior slope angle，PSA)及Rasmussen解剖评分，术后第2天、术后1年采用美国特种外科医院(Hospital for Special Surgery，HSS)评分评价膝关节功能。结果手术时间35~60 min，(55.6±4.4)min。术中出血量10~50 ml，(20.6±9.2)ml。骨折均Ⅰ期临床愈合，愈合时间8~12周，(10.5±1.3)周。25例随访12~36个月，(16.5±4.1)月。胫骨平台关节面塌陷距离由术前(9.2±2.2)mm恢复至术后第2天及术后1年(1.0±0.4)、(1.1±0.1)mm(均P=0.000)；PSA由术前212°±2.1°恢复至术后第2天8.9°±0.9°分和术后1年9.2°±0.6°(均P=0.000)；Rasmussen解剖评分由术前(7.8±1.8)分恢复至术后第2天(17.1±1.0)分和术后1年(16.3±0.7)分(均P=0.000)。与术后第2天比较，术后1年胫骨平台关节面塌陷距离、胫骨平台PSA及Rasmussen解剖评分差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。术后1年HSS评分(94.8±32)分，明显高于术后第2天(76.8±3.5)分(t=18.713，P=0.000)。结论经胫骨隧道复位联合Jail螺钉技术固定治疗孤立性胫骨平台后外侧塌陷骨折临床疗效满意，可避免继发性的关节面塌陷发生。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive reduction through bone tunnel combined with Jail screw fixation technique for the treatment of isolated posterolateral tibial plateau collapse fractures.MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on clinical data of 25 patients who were diagnosed as having isolated posterolateral tibial plateau collapse fractures from October 2016 to October 2020. The Mimics20.0 software was used for preoperative planning. All the patients were treated by cannulated rammer in tibial tunnel to reduce the collapsed fractures, and the tibial plateau posterolateral fractures were fixed with the Jail screws. The articular surface collapse distance, posterior slope angle (PSA) and the Rasmussen anatomical score of the tibial plateau were compared among before operation, on the second day after operation and one year after operation. The knee joint function was evaluated by the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score on the second day after operation and one year after operation.ResultsThe operation time was 35-60 min (mean, 55.6±4.4 min). The amount of bleeding was 10-50 ml (mean, 20.6±9.2 ml). Bone primary healing was achieved within 8-12 weeks (mean, 10.5±1.3 weeks). All the 25 patients were followed up for 12-36 months (mean, 16.5 ± 4.1 months). The collapse distance of articular surface recovered from (9.2±2.2) mm before operation to (1.0±0.4) mm on the second day after surgery and to (1.1±0.1) mm at 1 year after operation (all P=0.000). The PSA recovered from 21.2°±2.1° before operation to 8.9°±0.9° on the second day after surgery and to 9.2°±0.6° at 1 year after operation (all P=0.000). The Rasmussen anatomical scores recovered from preoperative (7.8±1.8) points to (17.1±10) points on the second postoperative day and to (16.3±0.7) points 1 year after operation (all P=0.000). Compared with the second day after operation, there were no significant differences in the articular surface collapse distance, posterior inclination angle and the Rasmussen anatomical scores of the tibial platform at 1 year after operation (all P>0.05). The HSS scores at 1 year after surgery (94.8±3.2 points) were statistically higher than those on the second day after surgery (76.8±3.5 points; t=18.713, P=0000).ConclusionThe Jail screw fixation technique through the bone tunnel can achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy for the treatment of isolated tibial plateau posterolateral collapse fractures, which can avoid secondary articular surface collapse.

参考文献/References:

[1]Zhai Q, Luo C, Zhu Y, et al. Morphological characteristics of splitdepression fractures of the lateral tibial plateau (Schatzker type Ⅱ): a computertomographybased study. Int Orthop,2013,37(5): 911-917.
[2]罗从风,胡承方,高洪,等.基于CT的胫骨平台骨折的三柱分型.中华创伤骨科杂志,2009,11(3):201-205.
[3]Yang G, Zhai Q, Zhu Y, et al. The incidence of posterior tibial plateau fracture: an investigation of 525 fractures by using a CTbased classification system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2013,133(7): 929-934.
[4]储旭东,谢友洋,徐瑞生,等.胫骨平台后外侧髁骨折手术治疗的改良方法及临床应用.创伤外科杂志,2021,23(6):446-450.
[5]Kfuri M, Schatzker J. Revisiting the Schatzker classification of tibial plateau fractures. Injury,2018,49(12):2252-2263.
[6]Ren D, Liu Y, Chen Y, et al. A novel method of the treatment for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. J Knee Surg,2020,33(10):1010-1019.
[7]任伟志，张文，彭建，等.胫骨平台后外侧骨折新型接骨板的生物力学研究.中华实验外科杂志,2021,38(12):2461-2464.
[8]邵佳申,郑占乐,吕红芝,等.双反牵引微创治疗后外侧胫骨平台骨折的疗效分析.中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,3(5):302-305.
[9]Rasmussen PS. Tibial condylar fractures. Impairment of knee joint stability as an indication for surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1973,55(7):1331-1350.
[10]Stupik A, Biatoszewski D. A comparative analysis of the clinical utility of the Staffelsteinscore and the hospital for special surgery knee score (HSS) in monitoring physiotherapy of total knee replacement patientspreliminary study. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil,2009,11(1):37-45.
[11]侯传勇,刘新晖.改良前外侧入路锁定钢板内固定治疗孤立性后外侧胫骨平台骨折疗效分析.中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2020,35(6):629-630.
[12]PratFabregat S, CamachoCarrasco P. Treatment strategy for tibial plateau fractures: an update. EFORT Open Rev,2017,1(5):225-232.
[13]Rudran B, Little C, Wiik A, et al. Tibial plateau fracture: Anatomy, diagnosis and management. Br J Hosp Med (Lond),2020,81(10):1-9.
[14]Carlson DA. Posterior bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma,2005,19(2):73-78.
[15]魏学忠,卢士学,王松,等.改良后侧入路手术治疗胫骨平台后外侧骨折.中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(4):346-349.
[16]肖飞,焦竞,黄玉成,等.侧卧位Frosch入路治疗胫骨平台后外侧骨折.中华实验外科杂志,2021,38(4):759-761.
[17]高先亭,朱爱祥,许兴柏,等.后内侧入路Ⅲ型中T型锁定板内固定治疗胫骨平台后外侧骨折.临床骨科杂志,2021,24(3):435-438.
[18]宋虎,左照光,孙再杰,等.腓骨头上入路外侧胫骨平台截骨结合外侧锁定钢板治疗单纯胫骨平台后外侧骨折.中华创伤骨科杂志,2019,21(2):166-169.
[19]Hu S, Chen S, Chang S, et al. Treatment of isolated posterolateral tibial plateau fracture with a horizontal belt plate through the anterolateral suprafibularhead approach. Biomed Res Int,2020:4186712.
[20]刘兆杰,贾健,胡永成,等.胫骨后外侧平台骨折手术入路及内固定方式的研究进展.中华创伤杂志,2019,35(4):368-376.
[21]Giannetti S, Bizzotto N, Stancati A, et al. Minimally invasive fixation in tibial plateau fractures using an preoperative and intraoperative real size 3D printing. Injury,2017,48(3):784-788.
[22]亢世杰,胡义明,鲍飞龙,等.双反牵引、微创复位及raft技术治疗后内及后外侧胫骨平台骨折.中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,4(5):261-265.
[23]郑占乐,连晓东,王博,等.经胫前隧道推顶复位胫骨平台塌陷骨折.中华创伤骨科杂志,2020,22(8):693-697.
[24]Yang Y, Zhou X, Ji H, et al. A novel arthroscopically assisted reduction technique for three patterns of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Surg Res,2020,15(1):376.
[25]翟生,黄涛.关节镜辅助与切开复位钢板内固定治疗SchatzkerⅠ~Ⅴ型胫骨平台骨折的比较.中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(10):901-905.
[26]Liang J, Zhang Q, Liu P, et al. Arthroscopicassisted inflatable bone tamp reduction for treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. Injury,2018,49(11):2061-2067.
[27]Greimel F, Weber M, Renkawitz T, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of tibial plateau depression fractures using balloon tibioplasty: Clinical outcome and absorption of bioabsorbable calcium phosphate cement. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong),2020,28:2309499020908721.
[28]Petersen W, Zantop T. Tibial head fracture open reposition and osteosynthesisarthroscopic reposition and osteosynthesis (ARIF). Unfallchirurg,2006,109(3):235-244.
[29]Petersen W, Zantop T. Fracture of the tibial head fracture. Der Unfallchirurg,2006,109(3):219-234.
[30]Vauclair F, Almasri M, Gallusser N, et al. Metaphyseal tibial level (MTL) screws: a modified percutaneous technique for lateral plateau depression fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2015,25:963-967.
[31]张玺,孙杰,李方国,等.交叉排钉技术对防止胫骨外侧平台骨折术后关节面塌陷的价值.中华骨科杂志,2018,38(15):897-904.
[32]Weimann A, Heinkele T, Herbort M, et al. Minimally invasive reconstruction of lateral tibial plateau fractures using the jail technique: a biomechanical study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2013,14(4):120.
[33]Solomon LB, Stevenson AW, Lee YC, et al. Posterolateral and anterolateral approaches to unicondylar posterolateral tibial plateau fractures: a comparative study. Injury,2013,44(11):1561-1568.
[34]Moran E, Zderic I, Klos K, et al. Reconstruction of the lateral tibia plateau fracture with a third triangular support screw: A biomechanical study. J Orthop Translat,2017,11(3):30-38.
[35]Doht S, Lehnert T, Frey S, et al. Effective combination of bone substitute and screws in the jail technique: a biomechanical study of tibial depression fractures. Int Orthop,2012,36(10):2121-2125.
[36]毛玉江,刘亚波,李庭,等.加速康复外科理念下胫骨平台骨折诊疗方案优化的专家共识.中华创伤骨科杂志,2020,22(10):829-840.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email：xiangrukong@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-03-13