[1]丁凯 凌为其** 谈春业 陈曦①.距下关节镜辅助下经皮撬拨复位螺钉固定与切开复位内固定治疗Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折的对比研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2021,01(6):508-512.
　Ding Kai,Ling Weiqi,Tan Chunye,et al.A Comparative Study of Subtalar Arthroscopy Assisted Percutaneous Poking Reduction Screw Fixation Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ Calcaneal Fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2021,01(6):508-512.
点击复制

距下关节镜辅助下经皮撬拨复位螺钉固定与切开复位内固定治疗Sanders II、III型跟骨骨折的对比研究()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2021年6期
页码:
508-512
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Comparative Study of Subtalar Arthroscopy Assisted Percutaneous Poking Reduction Screw Fixation Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ Calcaneal Fractures
作者:
丁凯 凌为其** 谈春业 陈曦①
（苏州大学附属第三医院创伤骨科，常州213000）
Author(s):
Ding Kai;  Ling Weiqi;  Tan Chunye;  et al.
Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213000, China
关键词:
跟骨骨折; 关节镜; 距下关节; 经皮复位
Keywords:
Calcaneal fracture; Arthroscope; Subtalar joint; Percutaneous reduction
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨关节镜辅助下经皮撬拨复位螺钉固定治疗Sanders Ⅱ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的疗效。方法回顾性比较我科 2010年8月~2019年10月97例新鲜闭合性跟骨骨折的临床资料，根据手术方式不同分为传统切开组和关节镜辅助微创组，比较2组患者术前等待时间、术中出血量、术后切口并发症（切口皮肤坏死和切口周围皮肤麻木）发生率、美国足踝矫形外科协会（American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society,AOFAS）评分和Maryland评分。结果关节镜辅助微创组术前等待时间（1.3±0.4）d，明显短于传统切开组（8.0±0.7）d（t=57.067，P=0.000）；术中出血量（17.8±3.1）ml，明显少于传统切开组（55.8±4.9）ml（t=46.143，P=0.000）；术后皮肤坏死、皮肤麻木发生率明显低于传统切开组［0 vs.37.0%（20/54），P=0000；2.3%（1/43） vs.50.0%（27/54）， χ2=26.497，P=0000］；AOFAS评分（93.6±2.5）分，明显高于传统切开组（81.7±3.1）分（t=-20.407，P=0.000）；Maryland评分（93.0±2.4）分，明显高于传统切开组（81.3±3.1）分（t=-21.112，P=0000）。2组患者跟骨长度、宽度、高度和Bohler角手术后均明显恢复（均P=0.000），传统切开组术后1年跟骨长度、宽度、高度和Bohler角与术后即刻比较有明显丢失（均P=0.000），关节镜辅助微创组术后1年与术后即刻比较丢失不明显（均P=1.000）。结论距下关节镜辅助下经皮撬拨复位螺钉固定与切开复位内固定治疗Sanders Ⅱ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折比较，可以缩短患者术前等待时间和手术时间，降低术中出血及术后并发症发生率。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of subtalar arthroscopy assisted percutaneous poking reduction screw fixation in the treatment of Sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures.MethodsWe retrospectively studied the data of 97 patients with fresh closed calcaneal fractures admitted to our department from August 2010 to October 2019. According to surgical methods, they were divided into traditional open group and the arthroscopy assisted minimally invasive group. The preoperative waiting time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative incision complications (skin necrosis of incision and the surrounding skin incision numbness), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and Maryland score were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe waiting time before operation in the arthroscopy assisted minimally invasive group was (1.3±0.4) d, significantly shorter than that in the traditional open group ［(8.0±07) d, t=57.067, P=0.000］; the intraoperative blood loss was (17.8±31) ml, significantly less than that in the traditional open group ［(55.8±4.9) ml, t=46.143, P=0.000］; the incidence of postoperative skin necrosis and numbness in the arthroscopy assisted minimally invasive group was significantly lower than that in the traditional incision group ［0 vs. 37.0% (20/54), P=0000; 2.3% (1/43) vs. 50.0% (27/54), χ2=26.497, P=0.000］; the AOFAS score (93.6±2.5) points was significantly higher than that of the traditional open group (81.7±3.1) points (t=-20.407, P=0.000); the Maryland score (93.0±2.4) points was significantly higher than that of the traditional open group (813±3.1) points (t=-21.112, P=0.000). The length, width, height and Bohler angle of the calcaneus in the two groups were significantly restored after operation (all P=0.000). The length, width, height and Bohler angle of the calcaneus in the traditional open group were significantly lost one year postoperatively as compared with those immediately after operation (all P=0000), and the loss in the arthroscopy assisted minimally invasive group had no significant differences as compared with those immediately after operation (all P=1.000).ConclusionCompared with open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures,subtalar arthroscopy assisted percutaneous poking reduction screw fixation can shorten the preoperative waiting time and operation time, and reduce the incidence of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications.

参考文献/References:

[1]Davis D, Seaman TJ, Newton EJ. Calcaneus Fractures.Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing,2020.1-2.
[2]Roukis TSDP. Jointsparing surgical management of Sanders Ⅳdisplaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Clin Podiatr Med Surg,2018,36(2):251-268.
[3]Aghnia Farda N, Lai J, Wang J, et al. Sanders classification of calcaneal fractures in CT images with deep learning and differential data augmentation techniques. Injury,2020,52(3):616-624.
[4]Seat A, Seat C. Lateral extensile approach versus minimal incision approach for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: A metaanalysis. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2020,59(2):356-366.
[5]Bibbo CDD, Siddiqui NDM, Fink JD, et al. Wound coverage options for soft tissue defects following calcaneal fracture management (operative/surgical). Clin Podiatr Med Surg,2018,36(2):323-337.
[6]Rodemund C, Krenn R, Kihm C, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for intraarticular calcaneus fractures: a 9year, singlecenter, retrospective study of a standardized technique using a 2point distractor. BMC Musculoskel Disord,2020,21(1):753.
[7]Li Z, Wu X, Zhou H, et al. Costutility analysis of extensile lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach in Sanders type Ⅱ/Ⅲ calcaneus fractures. J Orthop Surg Res,2020,15(1):1-430.
[8]马利杰,姚双权,吴昊天,等.经皮复位固定技术治疗严重塌陷型跟骨关节内骨折的近期疗效分析.中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(9):817-820.
[9]Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, et al. Clinical Rating systems for the anklehindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int,1994,15(7):349-353.
[10]Sanders R, Fortin P, DiPasquale T, et al. Operative treatment in 120 displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Results using a prognostic computed tomography scan classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1993,(290):87-95.
[11]Feng Y, Shui X, Wang J, et al. Comparison of percutaneous cannulated screw fixation and calcium sulfate cement grafting versus minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach and plate fixation for displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2016,17:288.
[12]Park C, Lee D. Surgical treatment of Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures using a sinus tarsi approach. Indian J Orthop,2017,51(4):461.
[13]Guo C, Xu Y, Li C, et al. Comparing less invasive plate fixation versus screw fixation of displaced intraarticular calcaneus fracture via sinus tarsi approach. Int Orthop,2020 Nov 4. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04867-5. Online ahead of print.
[14]沈杰,姜雪峰,黄国伟,等.跗骨窦入路微创钢板内固定治疗Sanders Ⅱ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折.中国微创外科杂志,2020,20(6):540-544.
[15]张大保,毛波.跗骨窦入路治疗跟骨SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型骨折的体会.中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(3):242-244,248.
[16]Nosewicz T, Knupp M, Barg A, et al. Miniopen sinus tarsi approach with percutaneous screw fixation of displaced calcaneal fractures: a prospective computed tomographybased study. Foot Ankle Int,2012,33(11):925-933.
[17]Busel G, Mir HR, Merimee S, et al. Quality of reduction of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures using a sinus tarsi versus extensile lateral approach. J Orthop Trauma,2020 Sep 18, Publish Ahead of Print.
[18]Grün W, Molund M, Nilsen F, et al. Results after percutaneous and arthroscopically assisted osteosynthesis of calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int,2020,41(6):689-697.
[19]Park CH, Yoon DH. Role of subtalar arthroscopy in operative treatment of Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures using a sinus tarsi approach. Foot Ankle Int,2018,39(4):443-449.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：国家自然科学基金面上项目（82072410）**通讯作者，Email：lingweiqi1031@163.com ①病理科
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-27