[1]黄新凯 赖海标** 钟喨 黄智峰.3种术式治疗上尿路结石的疗效对比[J].中国微创外科杂志,2021,01(2):134-138.
　Huang Xinkai,Lai Haibiao,Zhong Liang,et al.Comparison of Curative Effects of Three Surgical Procedures for Upper Urinary Calculi[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2021,01(2):134-138.
点击复制

3种术式治疗上尿路结石的疗效对比()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2021年2期
页码:
134-138
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Curative Effects of Three Surgical Procedures for Upper Urinary Calculi
作者:
黄新凯 赖海标** 钟喨 黄智峰
（广州中医药大学附属中山中医院泌尿外科，中山528400）
Author(s):
Huang Xinkai;  Lai Haibiao;  Zhong Liang;  et al.
Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan 528400, China
关键词:
孙氏镜; 超细经皮肾镜取石术; 硕通镜; 上尿路结石
Keywords:
Sun’s ureterorenoscope; SuperminiPCNL; Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope; Upper urinary calculus
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的比较孙氏镜、超细经皮肾镜取石术（superminiPCNL，SMP）及硕通镜碎石术处理上尿路结石的安全性与疗效。方法2019年1~9月我院采用孙氏镜或SMP或硕通镜治疗1.0~2.0 cm输尿管上段或肾结石120例（每组40例），比较3组手术时间、一期碎石成功率、术中出血量、术后住院时间、疼痛程度、住院费用、手术并发症、术后3个月结石清除率。 结果孙氏镜组手术时间（45.8±13.3）min，硕通镜组（50.1±12.8）min，明显短于SMP组（106.1±20.1）min（P<0.05）。SMP组一期碎石成功率97.5%，显著高于孙氏镜组77.5%和硕通镜组75.0%（P<0.05）。SMP组术后血红蛋白下降（14.2±6.4）g/L，显著高于孙氏镜组（4.1±2.3）g/L和硕通镜组（4.5±1.9）g/L（P<0.05）。SMP组住院时间（4.6±3.3）d，显著长于孙氏镜组（2.1±09）d和硕通镜组（2.5±1.1）d（P<0.05）。SMP组术后6 h疼痛VAS评分（4.1±1.7）分，显著高于孙氏镜组（2.1±0.7）分和硕通镜组（2.3±1.1）分（P<0.05）。孙氏镜组住院费用（1.1±0.4）万元，显著低于SMP组（1.8±1.3）万元和硕通镜组（16±05）万元（P<0.05）。术后3个月孙氏镜组结石清除率82.5%，SMP组97.5%，硕通镜组92.5%，3组比较差异无显著性（P>0.05）。孙氏镜组术后发热9例（22.5%），显著高于SMP组3例（7.5%）和硕通镜组1例（2.5%）（P<0.05）。SMP组肾周血肿发生率17.5%（7/40），与孙氏镜组7.5%（3/40）和硕通镜组5.0%（2/40）比较差异无显著性（P>0.05）。结论孙氏镜、SMP及硕通镜碎石术都是安全可靠的手术方式，孙氏镜、硕通镜更加微创，患者舒适度更好，住院时间更短，SMP在一期碎石成功率方面更有优势，但住院费用高、出血量多，3种术式可以成为互补，根据实际情况选择。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the safety and efficacy of Sun’s ureterorenoscope, superminiPCNL(SMP) and Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi.MethodsFrom January 2019 to September 2019, 120 patients with 1.0-2.0 cm upper ureteral or renal calculi were treated by Sun’s ureterorenoscope, SMP, or Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope in our hospital (40 cases per group). The differences of operation time, success rate of primary lithotripsy, bleeding volume, postoperative hospitalization time, pain degree, hospitalization cost, complications and stone removal rate in 3 months after operation were compared among the three groups.ResultsIn terms of operation time, the Sun’s ureterorenoscope group ［(45.8±13.3)min］ and the Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope group ［(50.1±12.8)min］ had more advantages, which were significantly shorter than the SMP group ［(106.1±20.1)min］(P<0.05). In terms of the success rate of lithotripsy, the SMP group (97.5%) was significantly higher than the Sun’s ureterorenoscope group (77.5%) and the Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope group (750%,P<005). The bleeding in the SMP group (14.2±6.4)g/L was the highest, which was significantly higher than the Sun’s ureterorenoscope group ［(4.1±2.3)g/L］ and the Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope group ［(4.5±1.9)g/L］(P<0.05). The hospital stay in the SMP group ［(4.6±3.3］d］ was the longest, which was significantly longer than Sun’s ureterorenoscope group ［(2.1±09)d］ and Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope group ［(25±1.1)d］(P<0.05). The postoperative pain in the SMP group ［(4.1±1.7)points］ was more obvious, which was significantly higher than Sun’s ureterorenoscope group Group ［(2.1±0.7)points］ and Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope group ［(2.3±1.1) points］(P<0.05). The hospitalization expense in the Sun’s ureterorenoscope group ［(1.1±0.4) thousand yuan］ was the least, which was significantly lower than SMP group ［1.8±1.3) thousand yuan］ and Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope group ［(1.6±0.5) thousand yuan］(P<0.05). The stone clearance rates in 3 months after surgery were 82.5% in the Sun’s ureterorenoscope group, 97.5% in the SMP group, and 92.5% in the Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope group, without significant differences between the three groups (P>005). Postoperative fever was highest in the Sun’s ureterorenoscope group (9 cases, 22.5%), which was significantly higher than the SMP group (3 cases, 7.5%) and the Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope group (1 case, 2.5%)(P<0.05). The incidence of perirenal hematoma was higher in the SMP group (7 cases,17.5%), but there was no significant difference as compared with the Sun’s ureterorenoscope group (3 cases,7.5%) and the Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope group (2 cases,5.0%)(P>0.05).ConclusionsSun’s ureterorenoscope, SMP and Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope are all safe and reliable surgical methods. Sun’s ureterorenoscope and Shuotong’s ureterorenoscope are more minimally invasive, with better patient comfort and shorter hospital stay, while the SMP has an advantage in the success rate of primary lithotripsy, but has higher hospitalization cost and more bleeding volume. The three techniques can be complementary and should be selected according to the actual situations.

参考文献/References:

[1]张华明,张家伟,孙东翀.末端可弯硬性输尿管肾镜治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的临床应用.中华泌尿外科杂志,2018,39(8):592.
[2]贾宏亮,李循,曾国华.超微经皮肾镜取石术与逆行输尿管软镜手术治疗儿童上尿路结石的对比研究.中华泌尿外科杂志,2018,39(12):885-889.
[3]陈上保,李伟民,吴树辉.硕通组合镜与经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗复杂性肾结石对比研究.右江医学,2019,47(5):352-355.
[4]胡豪,陈欣,蒋立,等.一期输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗≤2cm单侧上尿路结石的临床研究.第三军医大学学报,2018,40(12):1148-1154.
[5]任医民,伍筱梅,温宇,等.经皮肾镜取石术后肾出血栓塞失败的原因分析.中华医学杂志,2017,97(1):22-25.
[6]刘星明,沈乾,桑乾宏,等.内镜下急诊治疗妊娠输尿管结石梗阻肾绞痛36例.中国微创外科杂志,2018,18(8):765-766.
[7]沈寒坚,王飞翔,朱琨,等.《人体损伤致残程度分级》理解与适用——肾、输尿管、膀胱损伤.中国司法鉴定,2020(2):90-95.
[8]徐向军,黄永斌,刘兆飞,等.医源性腔镜下输尿管损伤的原因分析与处理.中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(4):372-374.
[9]Whitehurst LA, Somani BK. Perirenal hematoma after ureteroscopy: A systematic review. J Endourol,2017,31(5):438-445.
[10]Gameiro J, Goncalves M, Pereira M, et al. Obesity, acute kidney injury and mortality in patients with sepsis: a cohort analysis. Ren Fail,2018,40(1):120-126.
[11]曾国华,麦赞林,夏术阶,等.中国成年人群尿石症患病率横断面调查.中华泌尿外科杂志,2015,36（7）:528-532.
[12]孙颖浩,王林辉,许传亮.末端可弯型输尿管镜治疗肾盏结石的初步体会.中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(11):743-745.
[13]曾国华,李逊,何朝辉.微创经皮肾取石术和传统经皮肾镜取石术对肾皮质损伤的比较.中华实验外科杂志,2004,21(12):1551-1552.
[14]曾国华,万肖蓬,陈文忠.超微经皮肾镜取石术治疗31例肾结石的初步体会.中华泌尿外科杂志,2014,35(1):6-9.
[15]那彦群,叶章群,孙颖浩,等主编.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断及治疗指南手册:2014 版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014.138-140.
[16]王建松,李潇,李远伟,等.微通道经皮肾镜取石术严重出血的影响因素分析.国际泌尿系统杂志,2019,39(3):429-431.
[17]江斌,卓栋,张振兴,等.无管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂性肾结石及其适应证探讨.东南大学学报(医学版),2019,38(4):623-627.
[18]王树声,翁湘涛,周均洪,等.硕通镜治疗上尿路结石的有效性与安全性.中华泌尿外科杂志,2017,38（9）:671-674.
[19]邱智,张军晖,张际青,等.输尿管软镜碎石术后输尿管支架管留置时间的研究.中华泌尿外科杂志,2018,39(7):537-539.
[20]Kuroda S, Ito H, Sakamaki K, et al. A new prediction model for operative time of flexible ureteroscopy with lithotripsy for the treatment of renal stones. PLoS One,2018,13(2):e0192597.
[21]高小峰,李凌,彭泳涵,等.末段可弯硬性输尿管肾镜联合摩西碎石技术治疗输尿管上段结石的观察研究.中国激光医学杂志,2018,27(2):63-64.
[22]Emmott AS, Brotherhood H, Paterson RF, et al. Complications, reintervention rates and natural history of residual stone fragments following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol,2018,32(1):28-32.
[23]朱澄村,程帆,宁金卓,等.尿源性脓毒血症相关危险因素的研究进展.广西医学,2019,41(13):1701-1703.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：广东省科技攻关项目（2017B1045）**通讯作者，Email：12laolang@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-05-11