[1]刘东宁** 李巍明 刘楷 黄坤 陈侯磬 曾娘华 刘诚罗 万荣 易伟宏.颈椎后路经皮脊柱内镜椎间盘髓核切除术治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,01(3):240-244.
　Liu Dongning,Li Weiming,Liu Kai,et al.Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy for Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2020,01(3):240-244.
点击复制

颈椎后路经皮脊柱内镜椎间盘髓核切除术治疗神经根型颈椎病()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2020年3期
页码:
240-244
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy for Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy
作者:
刘东宁** 李巍明 刘楷 黄坤 陈侯磬 曾娘华 刘诚罗 万荣 易伟宏
（华中科技大学协和深圳医院（南山医院）脊柱外科，深圳518052）
Author(s):
Liu Dongning;  Li Weiming;  Liu Kai;  et al.
Department of Spine Surgery, Union Shenzhen Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518052, China
关键词:
神经根型颈椎病; 内镜; 椎间盘切除术; 颈椎后路
Keywords:
Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy; Endoscope; Discectomy; Cervical posterior approach
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨颈椎后路经皮脊柱内镜椎间盘髓核切除术（posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy，PPECD）治疗神经根型颈椎病（cervical spondylotic radiculopathy，CSR）的安全性和临床疗效。方法2014年8月～2017年12月全麻下PPECD治疗37例CSR，比较术前、出院时及末次随访疼痛视觉模拟评分(Visual Analogue Scale，VAS）、颈椎功能障碍指数（neck disability index, NDI），末次随访时采用改良MacNab分级、颈椎动力位片和MRI评估疗效。结果37例顺利完成手术，未出现围术期神经症状加重、脊髓损伤、血管损伤、脑脊液漏、感染等围手术期并发症。37例平均随访21.7月（13～50个月），出院时和末次随访时VAS评分分别为（2.1±0.6）分和（1.6±0.7）分，显著低于术前（6.2±1.0）分（P均=0000）；末次随访时NDI（14.3±39）%，显著低于术前（50.8±9.1）%（t=21.025,P=0.000）。末次随访时改良MacNab疗效优24例，良11例，可2例，优良率94.6%，颈椎过伸过屈位X线片未显示明显颈椎失稳。结论严格选择适应证的前提下，PPECD治疗CSR微创、安全，临床疗效满意。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the safety and curative effects of posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PPECD) for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR).MethodsA retrospective review was performed on 37 patients with CSR who underwent PPECD under general anesthesia from August 2014 to December 2017. Visual analog scale (VAS) and neck disability index score (NDI) were compared before operation, at discharge and at the last followup. At the last followup, the curative effect was evaluated by modified MacNab classification, cervical dynamic radiographs and MRI.ResultsAll the patients were performed by PPECD successfully without severe perioperative complications such as spinal cord and vascular injury, cerebrospinal fluid leakage or infection. The 37 patients were followed up for an average of 21.7 months (range, 13-50 months). The VAS scores were (2.1±0.6) points at discharge and (1.6±0.7) points at the final followup, respectively, which were statistically significant as compared to (6.2±1.0) points at the preoperative time (P=0.000). The NDI was (14.3±3.9)% at the final followup, significantly lower than preoperative level ［(50.8±9.1)%,t=21.025,P=0.000］. According to modified MacNab criteria, 24 cases obtained excellent outcome, 11 good and 2 fair, with an effective rate being 94.6%. No radiographic segmental instability was indicated on dynamic radiographs. ConclusionBased on strict selection of indications, PPECD is a safe and minimally invasive surgery for CSR, with reliable curative effects.

参考文献/References:

[1]袁文.融合还是置换：对颈椎植骨融合术的再认识.中华医学杂志,2005,85(1):11-14.
[2]Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, et al. A new full endoscopic technique for cervical posterior foraminotomy in the treatment of lateral disc herniations using 6.9mm endoscopes: prospective 2year results of 87 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg,2007,50(4):219-226.
[3]Komp M, Oezdemir S, Hahn P, et al. Fullendoscopic posterior foraminotomy surgery for cervical disc herniations. Oper Orthop Traumatol,2018,30(1):13-24.
[4]Kim CH, Kim KT, Chung CK, et al. Minimally invasive cervical foraminotomy and discectomy for laterally located soft disk herniation. Eur Spine J,2015,24(12): 3005-3012．
[5]Yang JS, Chu L, Chen L, et al. Anterior or posterior approach of fullendoscopic cervical discectomy for cervical intervertebral disc herniation? A comparative cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2014,39(21):1743-1750.
[6]Sterling M, Rebbeck T. The neck disability index(NDI).Aust J Physiother, 2005,51(4):271.
[7]Smith M, Foley K. Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg,1997,3(4):301-307.
[8]朱旻宇,滕红林,黄克伦,等.后路经皮内窥镜下颈椎间盘切除术治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床应用.中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2018,28(6):488-495.
[9]刘东宁,易伟宏,谭杰,等.显微内镜颈椎髓核摘除术治疗单节段神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效.中国骨与关节杂志,2016,5(5):339-343.
[10]Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H,et al. Fullendoscopic cervical posterior foraminotomy for the operation of lateral disc herniations using 5.9 mm endoscopes: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2008,33(9):940-948．
[11]Gala VC, O′Toole JE,Voyadzis JM, et al. Posterior minimally invasive approaches for the cervical spine. Orthop Clin N Am,2007,38(3):339-349．
[12]Deng ZL, Chu L, Chen L, et al. Anterior transcorporeal approach of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for disc herniation at the C4-C5 levels: a technical note. Spine J,2016,16(5):659-666.
[13]楚磊,陈亮,汪洋,等.后路经皮内窥镜下颈椎间盘髓核摘除术治疗颈椎间盘突出症.重庆医科大学学报,2014,39(2):219-222.
[14]聂治军,张银刚,袁启令,等.后路经皮内镜下颈椎间盘切除术治疗神经根型颈椎病的短期疗效观察.西安交通大学学报(医学版),2018,39(5):770-773.
[15]Kim CH, Shin KH, Chung CK, et al. Changes in cervical sagittal alignment after singlelevel posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical diskectomy. Global Spine J,2015,5(1):31-38.
[16]郭世绂,主编.骨科临床解剖学.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2006.9-10.
[17]Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, An HS, et al. The anatomic relation among the nerve roots, intervertebral foramina, and intervertebral discs of the cervical spine.Spine,2000,25(3):286-291.
[18]孔抗美,齐伟力,王卫东,等.颈神经根管切开减压术的应用解剖研究.中华骨科杂志,1997,17(8):479-481.
[19]Ahn Y. Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy using working channel endoscopes. Expert Rev Med Devices,2016,13(6):601-610.
[20]Youn MS, Shon MH, Seong YJ, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of twolevel endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy. Eur Spine J,2017,26(9):2450-2458.
[21]郑召民,郭家伟,刘尚礼.内窥镜辅助下颈椎微创手术.中国微创外科杂志,2003,3(4):284-285.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：深圳市卫计委学科建设能力提升项目（SZXJ2017057）**通讯作者，Email：liudn1029@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-06-19