[1]陶水祥** 张关富 沈翀 李俊龙 任煜 吴钢峰 骆振刚 卢振兴 阎家骏.结石CT值测定联合输尿管软镜治疗大负荷肾结石[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,01(3):234-236.
　Tao Shuixiang,Zhang Guanfu,Shen Chong,et al.Determination of Stone CT Value Combined With Flexible Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Large Load Kidney Stones[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2020,01(3):234-236.
点击复制

结石CT值测定联合输尿管软镜治疗大负荷肾结石()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2020年3期
页码:
234-236
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Determination of Stone CT Value Combined With Flexible Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Large Load Kidney Stones
作者:
陶水祥** 张关富 沈翀 李俊龙 任煜 吴钢峰 骆振刚 卢振兴 阎家骏
(绍兴市人民医院泌尿外科，绍兴312000)
Author(s):
Tao Shuixiang;  Zhang Guanfu;  Shen Chong;  et al.
Department of Urology, Shaoxing People’s Hospital, Shaoxing 312000, China
关键词:
CT值; 输尿管软镜; 肾结石
Keywords:
CT value; Flexible ureteroscopy; Renal stone
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨输尿管软镜下单次碎石治疗CT值≤800 HU、直径≥2 cm的肾结石的有效性、安全性和可行性。方法2016年1月~2018年12月我科对30例CT值≤800 HU、直径≥2 cm的肾结石行输尿管软镜下碎石。术前常规放置输尿管支架管2周。全麻后放置输尿管软镜鞘，沿鞘置入F9.8 Olympus电子输尿管软镜，插入200 μm或365 μm(结石位于肾盂者)钬激光光纤，钬激光碎石能量设置为1.0 J，频率20~30 Hz，逐步粉碎结石。粉碎后较大结石碎片套石网篮取出。术后留置输尿管支架管1根。结果30例均顺利放置镜鞘并置入输尿管软镜，一次进镜成功率100%。手术时间50~90 min，平均75 min。均无二次手术。28例手术成功，2例术后有残余结石（直径分别为8、10 mm），行体外冲击波碎石术后2~3周排出。5例术后发热，经加强抗炎输液对症处理后，体温降至正常。无输尿管穿孔、出血等并发症。术后住院2~4 d，平均2.4 d。术后随访1年，2例复发，3例发现肾结晶，无特殊处理。结论CT值≤800 HU的大负荷肾结石行输尿管软镜下碎石安全、有效、可行。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety, efficacy and feasibility of flexible ureterroscopic lithotripsy for treatment of kidney stones ≥ 2 cm in diameter and their CT value ≤ 800 HU.MethodsFrom January 2016 to December 2018, 30 patients with renal stones ≥ 2 cm in diameter and their CT value ≤ 800 HU underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy. A ureteral stent was placed routinely before the operation for 2 weeks, and a sheath was placed after the general anesthesia, along which a F9.8 Olympus flexible endoscope was placed into. The holmium laser fiber of 200 or 365 μm was inserted (the stone located in the renal pelvis), with the energy of holmium laser lithotripsy of 1.0 J and the frequency of 20-30 Hz. The stones were gradually fragmented, and the larger stone fragments were taken out with stone basket. One ureteral stent was retained after operation.ResultsAll the 30 cases were successfully placed the sheath and ureteroscope. The success rate of onestage access was 100%. The average operation time was 75 min(range,50-90 min). There was no second operation. A total of 28 cases were operated successfully, while other 2 cases had residual stones with diameter of 8 and 10 mm respectively, which were discharged 2 to 3 weeks after ESWL. There were 5 cases of postoperative fever, whose body temperature decreased to normal after the treatment of antiinflammatory infusion. No ureteral perforation, bleeding or other complications was seen. The average hospitalization time was 2.4 days(range,2-4 d). After 1 year’s followup, 2 cases recurred (stone size was 7 mm and 6 mm respectively), and 3 cases were found renal crystal without need of special treatment.ConclusionFlexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large load kidney stone with CT value ≤ 800 HU is safe, effective and feasible.

参考文献/References:

[1]Kuroda S，Ito H, Sakamaki K, et al. A new prediction model for operative time of flexible ureteroscopy with lithotripsy for the treatment of renal stones. PLoS One,2018,13(2):e0192597.
[2]Scales CD Jr,Tasian GE,Schwaderer AL, et al. Urinary stone disease: advancing knowledge, patient care, and population health. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol,2016,11(7):1305-1312.
[3]顾志文,郑彬,罗发彩,等.输尿管硬镜与软镜治疗10~20 mm输尿管上段结石的比较.中国微创外科杂志,2018,18(9):814-818.
[4]Hyams ES,Monga M,Pearle MS, et al. A Prospective, multiinstitutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stone less than 2cm. Urology,2015,193(1):165-169.
[5]Al Busaidy SS,Kurukkal SN,Al Hooti QM, et al. Is RIRS emerging as the preferred option for the management of 2 cm-4 cm renal stones: our experience. Can J Urol,2016,23(4):8364-8367.
[6]Zhang W, Zhou T, Wu T, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole renal stones: a metaanalysis and systematic review. J Endourol,2015,29(7):745-759.
[7]Kang DH, Cho KS, Ham WS, et al. Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones. Investig Clin Urol,2016,57(6):408-416.
[8]Giusti G,Proietti S,Luciani LG,et al. Is retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones with diameters exceeding 2 cm still a hazard? Can J Urol,2014,21(2):7207-7212.
[9]Scotland KB,Rudnick B,Healy KA, et al. Retrograde ureteroscopic management of large renal calculi: a single institutional experience and concise literature review. J Endourol,2018,32(7):603-607.
[10]陶水祥,吴刚峰,骆振刚,等.结石CT值测定联合输尿管软镜单次治疗大负荷肾结石.中华腔镜外科杂志：电子版,2015,8(5):340-342.
[11]Karakoyunlu N,Goktug G, �瘙 塁 ener NC, et al. A comparison of standard PCNL and staged retrograde FURS in pelvis stones over 2 cm in diameter: a prospective randomized study. Urolithiasis,2015,43(3):283-287.
[12]Abdelaziz H, Elabiad Y, Aderrouj I, et al. The usefulness of stone density and patient stoutness in predicting extracorporeal shock wave efficiency: Results in a North African ethnic group. Can Urol Assoc J,2014,8(7-8):E567-E569.
[13]Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H,et al. Predictive value of attenuation coefficients measured as Hounsfield units on noncontrast computed tomography during flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a singlecenter experience. J Endourol,2012,26(9):1125-1130.
[14]Takazawa R, Kitayama S,Tsujii T. Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Int J Urol,2012,19(3):264-267.
[15]Karako O, Karakei A, Ozan T, et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stones greater than 2 cm. Turk J Urol,2015,41(2):73-77.
[16]Zheng C,Xiong B,Wang H,et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones >2 cm: a metaanalysis. Urol Int,2014,93(4):417-424.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：绍兴市科技计划项目（2015B70053）**通讯作者，Email：tsxtgq@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-06-19