[1]李慕行王行雁原春辉马朝来蒋斌李磊张利修典荣**.胰漏危险度评分系统用于预测胰十二指肠切除术后胰漏低风险患者的价值[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,01(3):224-258.
　Li Muxing,Wang Hangyan,Yuan Chunhui,et al.Prediction Value of Fistula Risk Score in Patients With Low Risk of Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2020,01(3):224-258.
点击复制

胰漏危险度评分系统用于预测胰十二指肠切除术后胰漏低风险患者的价值()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2020年3期
页码:
224-258
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Prediction Value of Fistula Risk Score in Patients With Low Risk of Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
作者:
李慕行王行雁原春辉马朝来蒋斌李磊张利修典荣**
(北京大学第三医院普通外科，北京100191)
Author(s):
Li Muxing;  Wang Hangyan;  Yuan Chunhui;  et al.
Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
关键词:
胰漏危险度评分系统; 临床相关胰漏
Keywords:
Fistula Risk Score; Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨胰漏危险度评分系统(Fistula Risk Score，FRS)预测胰十二指肠切除术后临床相关胰漏(clinically relevant pancreatic fistula，CRPF)低风险患者的价值。方法回顾性分析2015年1月~2017年6月我科90例胰十二指肠切除术的临床资料，使用剂量-反应关系及诊断效能四格表法分析FRS在预测胰十二指肠切除术后CRPF低风险患者中的价值。结果共19例发生CRPF，其中B、C级胰漏分别为17、2例；发生时间：2例术后第8天发生，2例术后第10天发生，5例术后第14天发生，2例术后第16天发生，8例术后第21天发生。对90例进行FRS评分与CRPF发生的剂量-反应关系分析显示，FRS<4分的25例均无CRPF发生，敏感性100.0%(19/19)，阴性预测值100.0%(25/25)。结论FRS对于发生CRPF风险低的患者预测价值较好，对于FRS<4分的患者可尝试采取更为积极的快速康复方案。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluated the prediction value of Fistula Risk Score (FRS) in patients with low risk of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CRPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).MethodsClinical data of 90 patients who underwent PD from January 2015 to June 2017 in our department was retrospectively analyzed. The relationship between FRS and CRPF was analyzed by using doseresponse relationship and fourfold table for diagnostic efficiency.ResultsThere were 19 cases of CRPF, including 17 cases of grade B and 2 cases of grade C pancreatic leakage. The time of occurrence was 2 cases occurred on the 8th day, 2 cases on the 10th day, 5 cases on the 14th day, 2 cases on the 16th day and 8 cases on the 21st day. The doseresponse relationship evaluation of the 90 patients identified that no CRPF occurred in the 25 patients with FRS<4 points. The corresponding sensitivity was 100.0% (19/19) and the negative predictive value was 100.0% (25/25).ConclusionsFRS has a better predictive value for patients with low risk of CRPF. For patients with FRS<4 points, a more active rapid rehabilitation program can be used.

参考文献/References:

[1]Pedrazzoli S. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF): A systematic review and analysis of the POPFrelated mortality rate in 60,739 patients retrieved from the English literature published between 1990 and 2015. Medicine (Baltimore),2017,96(19):e6858.
[2]Graham JA, Kayser R, Smirniotopoulos J, et al. Probability prediction of a postoperative pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy allows for more transparency with patients and can facilitate management of expectations. J Surg Oncol,2013,108(2):137-138.
[3]Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, et al. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg,2013,216(1):1-14.
[4]Mcmillan MT, Vollmer CJ. Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg,2014,399(7):811-824.
[5]江兵，黄强.胰瘘风险评分系统在胰十二指肠切除术的应用价值.中华肝胆外科杂志,2019,25(9):668-671.
[6]Grendar J, Jutric Z, Leal JN, et al. Validation of Fistula Risk Score calculator in diverse North American HPB practices. HPB (Oxford),2017,19(6):508-514.
[7]中华医学会外科学分会胰腺外科学组，中国研究型医院学会胰腺病专业委员会，中华外科杂志编辑部.胰腺术后外科常见并发症诊治及预防的专家共识(2017).中华外科杂志,2017,55(5):328-334.
[8]Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery,2017,161(3):584-591.
[9]王广伟，张树彬.降落伞缝合法在全腔镜胰头十二指肠切除术胰肠吻合中的应用.中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(3):260-262.
[10]Nahm CB, Connor SJ, Samra JS, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a review of traditional and emerging concepts. Clin Exp Gastroenterol,2018,11:105-118.
[11]Mcmillan MT, Malleo G, Bassi C, et al. Multicenter, prospective trial of selective drain management for pancreatoduodenectomy using risk stratification. Ann Surg,2017,265(6):1209-1218.
[12]王振勇，刘汝海，李凤山，等.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后胰漏的相关因素分析.中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(2):106-110.
[13]Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery,2005,138(1):8-13.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：北京大学第三医院临床重点项目孵育项目A类（BYSY2018025）**通讯作者，Email: xiudianrong7320@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-06-19