[1]李尧 李权 何奇瑞 齐隽 刘建河*.输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石术后输尿管石街形成的处理时机[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,01(1):39-41.
 Li Yao,Li Quan,He Qirui,et al.The Timing of Treatment for Steinstrasse After Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy With Holmium Laser[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2020,01(1):39-41.
点击复制

输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石术后输尿管石街形成的处理时机()
分享到:

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2020年1期
页码:
39-41
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Timing of Treatment for Steinstrasse After Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy With Holmium Laser
作者:
李尧 李权 何奇瑞 齐隽 刘建河*
(上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院泌尿外科,上海200092)
Author(s):
Li Yao Li Quan He Qirui et al.
Department of Urology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
关键词:
肾结石输尿管结石输尿管石街输尿管软镜钬激光
Keywords:
Renal calculiUreteral calculiSteinstrasseFlexible ureteroscopyHolmium laser
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨输尿管软镜碎石术(flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy,FURL)后输尿管石街形成的腔内微创手术处理的时机。方法2011年2月~2017年6月我院采用FURL处理经选择的直径>2 cm肾或输尿管上段结石388例,术后复查腹部平片(KUB)或CT示输尿管石街56例,石街长度1.5~4.6 cm,按照Coptcoat石街分型,Ⅰ型16例,Ⅱ型12例,Ⅲ型28例。积极保守药物排石治疗4~8周后,石街未完全排除患者行输尿管镜钬激光碎石取石(ureteroscopic lithotripsy,URL)处理。结果56例输尿管石街保守药物排石治疗4周后,仅18例输尿管末段短距离石街(Ⅰ型16例,Ⅱ型2例)顺利排出,其余38例(Ⅱ型10例,Ⅲ型28例)术后4~8周行URL,其中31例术后保守治疗4周后行URL,5例保守治疗6周后行URL,2例保守治疗8周后行URL。38例输尿管石街全部一期URL碎石取石成功,手术时间32~110 min,平均56 min。14例因术后输尿管黏膜严重水肿再次留置输尿管支架管。无一例发生术中严重并发症,术后3例出现高热,经积极抗感染治疗后好转。术后住院2~5 d,平均3 d。结论对于FURL术后Ⅱ或Ⅲ型(长距离石街或者石街中混合有较大体积结石碎片)输尿管石街,长时间停留结石碎片的局部刺激容易出现黏膜水肿,自行排石效果更不理想,建议在术后4周积极采用URL清除石街,及时解除梗阻,以减少进一步的肾功能损害。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the timing of treatment of steinstrasse after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) with holmium laser.MethodsFrom February 2011 to June 2017, 388 patients with renal or ureteral calculi more than 2 cm in diameter underwent FURL with holmium laser by the same surgeon in our hospital. Postoperative reexaminations of Xray or CT scanning showed steinstrasse formation with a length of 1.5-4.6 cm. According to the Coptcoat’s steinstrasse classification, there were type Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ steinstrasse in 16, 12, and 28 patients, respectively. Patients who had no responds to 4-8 weeks of conservative treatment were subjected to ureteroscopic lithotripsy(URL).ResultsConservative management was successful in 18 cases of ureteral shortdistance steinstrasse (16 cases of type Ⅰ and 2 cases of type Ⅱ) after 4 weeks. The remaining 38 cases (10 cases of type Ⅱ and 28 cases of type Ⅲ) were successfully treated with URL at 4-8 weeks postoperatively, including 31 cases treated at 4 weeks postoperatively, 5 cases at 6 weeks, and 2 cases at 8 weeks. The operation time ranged from 32 to 110 min with a mean of 56 min. There were 14 cases of postoperative ureteral mucosal severe edema needing a reindwelling ureteral stent. No major intraoperative complications were identified. Postoperative highgrade fever was observed only in 3 patients, and all these patients were successfully treated conservatively.The patients were discharged from hospital in 2-5 days (mean, 3 days).ConclusionsFor type Ⅱ and Ⅲ steinstrasse (long distance steinstrasse or mixed with large volume stone fragments) after FURL, local stimulation of stone fragments staying for a long time is prone to mucosal edema, and the effect of self stone removal is unsatisfactory. It is suggested that URL should be actively used to remove steinstrasse in 4 weeks after operation, and the obstruction should be relieved in time to reduce further renal function damage.

参考文献/References:

[1]Prabhakar M. Retrograde ureteroscopic intrarenal surgery for large (1.6-3.5 cm) upper ureteric/renal calculus. Indian J Urol,2010,26(1):46-49.
[2]Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, et al. Efficacy of retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi >2 cm. Urol Res,2010,38(5):397-402.
[3]Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Int J Urol,2012,19(3):264-267.
[4]刘建河,潘春武,李瑞鹏,等.输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石处理直径>2 cm肾结石.中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(2):132-133.
[5]王坚,周大庆,王封景,等.输尿管软镜碎石术后输尿管石街形成分析及处理.微创泌尿外科杂志,2016,5(2):94-97.
[6]Coptcoat MJ, Webb DR, Kellet MJ, et al. The steinstrasse: A legacy of extracorporeal lithotripsy? Eur Urol,1988,14(2):93-95.
[7]Phukan C, Nirmal TJ, Wann CV, et al. Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?Urol Ann,2017,9(1):51-54.
[8]Proietti S, Knoll T, Giusti G. Contemporary ureteroscopnic management of renal stones. Int J Surg,2016,36(PtD):681-687.
[9]Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Endourol,2012,26(10):1257-1263.
[10]Rabbani SM. Treatment of steinstrasse by transureteral lithotripsy. Urol J,2008,5(2):89-93.
[11]Goyal R, Dubey D, Khurana N, et al. Does the type of steinstrasse predict the outcome of expectant therapy? Indian J Urol,2006,22(2):135-138.
[12]叶友新,邢金春,刘荣福,等.肾结石输尿管软镜碎石术后不同双J管留置时间对并发输尿管石街的治疗价值.中国医师进修杂志,2016,39(2):131-134.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者,Email:liujianhe@Xinhuamed.com.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-16