[1]李云飞①,等.一种新的经皮椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎术后椎间盘突出症的疗效分析[J].中国微创外科杂志,2018,18(5):389-393.
　Gu Yutong*,Li Yunfei,Zhu Donghui,et al.A New Technique of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation After Previous Intervention[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2018,18(5):389-393.
点击复制

一种新的经皮椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎术后椎间盘突出症的疗效分析()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
18
期数:
2018年5期
页码:
389-393
栏目:
临床论著
出版日期:
2018-09-04

文章信息/Info

Title:
A New Technique of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation After Previous Intervention
作者:
顾宇彤**; 李云飞①; 朱东晖②; 周晓岗; 冯振洲; 董健
复旦大学附属中山医院骨科，上海200032
Author(s):
Gu Yutong*;  Li Yunfei;  Zhu Donghui;  et al.
*Department of Orthopaedics, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
关键词:
腰椎间盘突出症; 经椎间孔; 内镜下椎间盘摘除术; 微创外科
Keywords:
Lumbar disc herniation; Transforaminal; Endoscopic discectomy; Minimally invasive surgery
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨一种新的经皮椎间孔镜技术（percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery，PTES）治疗腰椎术后复发、邻椎病等腰椎间盘突出症的可行性、安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析2012年1月~2014年6月使用PTES治疗57例腰椎术后椎间盘突出症的资料，术后手术节段复发40例，术后手术节段残留7例，神经减压植骨融合术后邻椎病9例，L5/S1椎间孔镜术后发生L4/5椎间盘突出症1例。均行PTES。随访2年，进行下肢放射痛视觉模拟评分（Visual Analogue Scale，VAS），采用MacNab法进行疗效评级。结果手术时间（52.4±5.9）min，中位术中透视次数5（4~14）次，出血量5（2~20）ml，住院时间3（2~4）d。术后即刻下肢放射痛VAS评分由术前的9（6~10）分降至1（0~3）分，术后2年随访为0（0~3）分。术后2年MacNab分级优51例，良5例，可1例，差0例。优良率98.2%（56/57）。无永久性神经损伤、腹腔脏器损伤、大血管破裂。结论PTES技术治疗腰椎术后复发、邻椎病等椎间盘突出症简便、安全且有效。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a new technique of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) for disc herniations after previous intervention.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed in 57 cases of disc herniations after previous intervention, including 40 cases of recurrent herniation, 7 cases of residual fragments after previous intervention at the surgery level, 9 cases of adjacent disc herniation after decompression and fusion, and 1 case of L4/5 herniation after transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for L5/S1. The PTES was carried out in all the cases. Preoperative and postoperative leg pain was evaluated by using the 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the results were determined to be excellent, good, fair, or poor according to the MacNab classification during 2-year follow-ups. ResultsThe duration of operation was (52.4±5.9) min. The mean frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy was 5 (4-14) times. The blood loss was 5 (2-20) ml. The length of hospital stay was 3 (2-4) days. The VAS score of leg pain was dropped from 9 (6-10) points before operation to 1 (0-3) points immediately after the operation and to 0 (0-3) points at 2 years after operation. During 2-year follow-ups, 98.2% (56/57) of the patients showed excellent (51 cases) or good (5 cases) outcomes, 1.8% (1/57) fair, and no poor outcomes. No patients had any form of permanent iatrogenic nerve damage or major complications.ConclusionPTES for recurrent, residual, and adjacent disc herniations after previous intervention is an easy, effective and safe technique.

参考文献/References:

[1]Yeung AT.Minimally invasive disc surgery with the Yeung Endoscopic Spine System (YESS).Surg Tech Int,1999,8:1-11.
[2]Yeung AT,Tsou PM.Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation.Surgical technique,outcome and complications in 307 consecutive cases.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2002,27(7):722-731.
[3]Hoogland T.Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy with foraminoplasty for lumbar disc herniation.In:Duparc J.Surgical Techniques in Orthopaedics and Traumatology.Paris:Elsevier SAS,2003.55-120.
[4]Hoogland T,Schubert M,Miklitz B,et al.Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a lowdose chymopapain:a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases.Spine,2006,31:E890-897.
[5]Hoogland T,van den BrekelDijkstra K,Schubert M,et al.Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation.A prospective,cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive cases.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2008,33(9):973-978.
[6]Choi KC,Kim JS,Ryu KS,et al.Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5S1 disc herniation:transforaminal versus interlaminar approach.Pain Physician,2013,16(6):547-556.
[7]张德辉,李运芝,张智慧,等.椎间孔镜治疗有典型根性症状的腰椎手术失败综合征.中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(7):647-649.
[8]Ahn Y,Oh HK,Kim H.Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminatomy:an advanced surgical technique and clinical outcomes.Neurosurgery,2014,75(2):124-133.
[9]杨进,孔清泉,宋跃明.三种经皮内镜椎间盘髓核摘除术治疗伴高髂嵴的L5-S1椎间盘突出症.中国骨与关节杂志,2014,3(8):608-614.
[10]张之栋,杜怡斌,储建军.经皮椎间孔镜腰椎间盘摘除术与微创经椎间孔腰椎融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的前瞻性随机对照研究.中国微创外科杂志,2015,15(7):583-587.
[11]Choi KC,Park CK.Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation:consideration of the relation between the iliac crest and L5-S1 disc.Pain Physician,2016,19(2):E301-E308.
[12]吴健,范胜利,关月红.经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术后感觉异常及穿刺操作技巧分析:附4例报告.中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(7):670-672.
[13]Nakamura SI,Myers RR.Injury to dorsal root ganglia alters innervation of spinal cord dorsal horn lamina involved in nociception.Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2000,25(5):537-542.
[14]Gu YT,Cui Z,Shao HW,et al.Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation:a surgical technique,outcome,and complications in 209 consecutive cases.J Orthop Surg Res,2017,12(1):25.
[15]顾宇彤,吕德荣,崔展,等.PTES椎间孔镜技术治疗腰5/骶1椎间盘突出症的技巧及疗效.中国临床医学,2017,24(4):497-503.
[16]MacNab I.Negative disc exploration:an analysis of the causes of nerve root involvement in sixtyeight patients.J Bone Joint Surg Am,1971,53(5):891-903.
[17]MorganHough CV,Jones PW,Eisenstein SM.Primary and revision lumbar discectomy.A 16year review from one centre.J Bone Joint Surg Br,2003,85(6):871-874.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：上海申康医院发展中心临床科技创新项目——市级医院新兴前沿技术联合攻关项目（SHDC12016230）**通讯作者，E-mail：447574313@qq.com①（上海市嘉定区中心医院骨科，上海201800）②（上海电力医院骨科，上海200050）李云飞、朱东晖为共同第一作者
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-04