[1]谢建新*,路磊,邵强,等.克氏针临时髓内固定联合锁定解剖钢板与重建钢板治疗粉碎性锁骨骨折的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(5):437-440.
 Xie Jianxin,Lu Lei,Shao Qiang,et al.Comparison Between Locking Anatomical Plate with Kirschner Wire Temporary Fixation and Reconstruction Plate for Comminuted Midshaft Clavicle Fracture[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2017,17(5):437-440.
点击复制

克氏针临时髓内固定联合锁定解剖钢板与重建钢板治疗粉碎性锁骨骨折的比较()
分享到:

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
17
期数:
2017年5期
页码:
437-440
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-07-14

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison Between Locking Anatomical Plate with Kirschner Wire Temporary Fixation and Reconstruction Plate for Comminuted Midshaft Clavicle Fracture
作者:
谢建新*路磊邵强余建王权张晓辉黄轶峰潘科良①陈少易①
绍兴市中心医院骨一科,绍兴312030
Author(s):
Xie Jianxin Lu Lei Shao Qiang et al.
Department of Orthopedics, Shaoxing Central Hospital, Shaoxing 312030, China
关键词:
锁骨骨折锁定钢板
Keywords:
Clavicle fractureLocking plate
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨克氏针临时髓内固定联合锁定解剖钢板治疗粉碎性锁骨骨折的临床疗效。方法2007年2月~2014年2月采用克氏针临时髓内固定联合锁定解剖钢板微创治疗粉碎性锁骨骨折52例(微创组),与同期采用重建钢板治疗粉碎性锁骨骨折60例(传统组)进行比较,比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、切口总长度、术后24 h疼痛VAS评分、骨折愈合时间、术后并发症发生率、术后3个月患肩Neer评分。结果112例粉碎性锁骨骨折均顺利完成内固定术。微创组手术时间明显短于传统组[(45.0±7.5) min vs.(62.0±15.5) min, t=-7.208,P =0.000], 术中出血量明显少于传统组[(25.0±16.5) ml vs.(63.0±19.7)ml, t=-10.968,P =0.000],切口总长度明显短于传统组[(6.4±0.8) cm vs.(10.3±1.7)cm, t=-15.147,P =0.000],术后24 h疼痛VAS评分明显低于传统组[(1.9±0.5) 分 vs.(4.4±0.4)分,t=-29.378,P=0000],骨折愈合时间明显短于传统组[(9.3±1.2) 周 vs.(11.4±1.3)周,t=-8.834,P=0.000],并发症发生率明显低于传统组[0 vs.8.3%(5/60),Fisher精确检验,P=0.041]。112例随访12~48个月,平均14个月,2组术后3个月肩关节功能评分差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论克氏针临时髓内固定联合锁定解剖钢板微创治疗粉碎性锁骨骨折具有创伤小、手术时间短、复位容易、固定可靠、骨折愈合时间短、术后并发症发生率低等优点,是一种较理想的治疗方法。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of minimally invasive treatment of comminuted fracture of the clavicle with temporary intramedullary interlocking nail and locking anatomical plate.MethodsFrom February 2007 to February 2014, 52 cases of comminuted fracture of the clavicle were treated with the temporary intramedullary fixation plus locking anatomical plate(minimally invasive group). Another 60 cases who received the surgery via a traditional incision in the same period were set as the control group. The operation time, blood loss, the length of incision, 24-hour VAS scores, fracture healing time, incidence of postoperative complications, and Neer scores after 3 months were compared between the two groups.Results The surgery was successfully operated in all the 112 cases. As compared to the traditional group, the minimally invasive group had shorter operative time [(45.0±7.5) min vs. (62.0±15.5) min, t=-7.208, P=0.000], less blood loss [(25.0±16.5) ml vs. (63.0±19.7) ml, t=-10.968, P=0.000], shorter incision length [(6.4±0.8) cm vs. (10.3±1.7) cm, t=-15.147, P=0.000], lower VAS pain score [(1.9±0.5) point vs. (4.4±0.4) point, t=-29.378, P=0.000], and shorter fracture healing time [(9.3±12) weeks vs. (11.4±1.3) weeks, t=-8.834, P=0.000]. The complication rate in the minimally invasive group was significantly lower than that in the traditional group [0 vs.8.3% (5/60), Fisher’s exact test, P=0.041]. All the patients were followed up for 12-48 months (mean,14 months). There was no significant difference in shoulder function after the operation after 3 months (P>0.05).ConclusionsThe minimally invasive treatment of comminuted fracture of the clavicle with the temporary intramedullary interlocking nail and locking anatomical plate has advantages of less trauma, shorter operative time, easy reduction, reliable fixation,shorter fracture healing time and lower complication rate. It is a good treatment method.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈少易,谢建新,竺湘江,等.克氏针临时髓内固定加重建钢板治疗锁骨中段粉碎性骨折12例.浙江医学,2009,31(6):855-856.
[2]Miccoli P, Berti P, Materazzi G, et al. Minimally invasive video assised thyroidectomy: five years experience.J Am Coil Surg,2004,199(8):243-248.
[3]Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fracture: Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1970,52(6):1077-1089.
[4]Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA,Cole PA,et al.Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures:systematic review of 2144 fractures:on behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group.J Orthop Trauma,2005,19(7):504-507.
[5]Collinge C,Devinney S,Herscovici D, et al.Anterior-inferior plate fixation of middle-third fractures and nonunions of the clayicle.J Orthop Trauma,2006,20(10):680-686.
[6]王琳珏,马宝通,李恩琪.成人锁骨中段骨折手术治疗与非手术治疗的Meta分析.中华骨科杂志,2011,31(4):308-315.
[7]孙军战,郑国海,赵克义.微创空心螺钉髓内固定治疗锁骨骨折.中华骨科杂志,2013,33(7):695-700.
[8]王保栋,刘春海,崔凯,等.经皮微创锁定型解剖钢板治疗锁骨中段骨折47例.实用骨科杂志,2015,21(4):344-346.
[9]蔡俊丰,祝建光,彭庄,等.小切口重建钢板治疗锁骨中段骨折的比较研究.中国微创外科杂志,2010,10(9):792-794.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者,E-mail:xjxclyjw@163.com①(嵊州市人民医院骨一科,嵊州312045)
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-07-14