[1]孙俊,徐伟珏*,吕志宝,等.腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗小儿肠套叠的临床疗效比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(5):422-424.
　Sun Jun,Xu Weijue,Lü Zhibao,et al.Laparoscopic Versus Open Reduction of Intussusception in Children[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2017,17(5):422-424.
点击复制

腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗小儿肠套叠的临床疗效比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
17
期数:
2017年5期
页码:
422-424
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-07-14

文章信息/Info

Title:
Laparoscopic Versus Open Reduction of Intussusception in Children
作者:
孙俊; 徐伟珏*; 吕志宝; 刘江斌; 黄雄; 黄一敏; 吴一波; 陈舟; 盛庆丰
上海市儿童医院上海交通大学附属儿童医院普外科，上海200062
Author(s):
Sun Jun;  Xu Weijue;  Lü Zhibao;  et al.
Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Children’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200062, China
关键词:
肠套叠; 腹腔镜; 小儿
Keywords:
Intussusception; Laparoscopy; Child
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨腹腔镜手术治疗小儿肠套叠的临床价值。方法回顾性分析2014 年5 月~2015 年5 月15 例腹腔镜手术（腹腔镜组）治疗小儿肠套叠的临床资料，并与同期22 例传统开腹手术（开腹组）进行比较，比较2组手术时间、恢复正常饮食时间、住院时间及并发症等。结果腹腔镜组13 例腔镜下复位，成功率86.7%（13/15），中转开腹2例。腹腔镜组手术时间稍短,但2组差异无统计学意义［中位数55 min（39~146 min） vs. 67 min（49~158 min），Z =-1.657，P=0098］。与开腹组比较，腹腔镜组术后恢复正常饮食时间明显缩短［（4.2±1.3）d vs.（5.5±2.1）d，t=-2.007，P=0.053］，2组住院时间无统计学差异［（52±14）d vs.（6.5±2.2）d，t=-1.756，P=0.089］。2组术中、术后并发症各4例，无统计学差异（Fisher精确检验，P=0.433）。腹腔镜组15例随访6~17个月，（11.0±3.5）月：1 例术后2个月再次发生肠套叠，经空气灌肠复位成功；余均无异常，无粘连性肠梗阻发生。传统组22例随访6~17个月，（10.7±3.0）月：1 例术后1个月发生小肠梗阻，经保守治疗后好转；1 例术后3个月再次发生肠套叠，经空气灌肠复位成功；余无异常。结论腹腔镜手术治疗小儿肠套叠安全、有效，不增加术中、术后并发症，对于熟悉腹腔镜操作的医生可作为首选治疗方案。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical value of laparoscopic reduction of intussusception in children.MethodsA retrospective review was performed to evaluate outcomes of patients with intussusception who were treated with laparoscopical reduction (LAP group, n=15) or with exploratory laparotomy (OPEN group, n=22) from May 2014 to May 2015. The operation time, normal diet time, length of hospital stay, and complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsIn the LAP group, laparoscopical reduction was successfully completed in 13 cases (86.7%) while a conversion to open procedure was required in 2 cases. The median operation time was not statistically different between the two groups ［55 min (39-146 min) vs. 67 min (49-158 min), Z=-1.657, P=0.098］. As compared to the OPEN group, the postoperative time to normal diet was significantly shorter ［(4.2±1.3) d vs. (5.5±21) d, t=-2.007, P=0.053］ in the LAP group and the length of hospital stay was not significantly different［(5.2±1.4) d vs. (6.5±2.2) d, t=-1.756, P=0.089］ between the two groups. The intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in 4 cases in both groups, without statistical difference (Fisher’s exact test, P=0.433). The LAP group (15 cases) was followed up for 6-17 months (11.0±3.5 months). Reoccurance of intussusception occurred in 1 case two months after surgery and was successfully treated with air reduction. No adhesive obstruction was found. The OPEN group (22 cases) was followed for 6-17 months (10.7±3.0 months). Intestinal obstruction occurred in 1 case at the first postoperative month, which was treated with conservative management. Reoccurance of intussusception happened in 1 case at the third postoperative month and was successfully treated with air reduction.ConclusionsLaparoscopy is safe and effective in the treatment of pediatric intussusceptions. Pediatric surgeons with adequate minimally invasive skills should choose laparoscopy as primary surgical technique in the treatment of intussusceptions.

参考文献/References:

[1]Guo JZ, Ma XY, Zhou QH. Results of air pressure enema reduction of intussusception: 6,396 cases in 13 years. J Pediatr Surg, 1986,21(12):1201-1203.
[2]Schier F. Experience with laparoscopy in the treatment of intussusception. J Pediatr Surg, 1997,32(12):1713-1714.
[3]Chui CH, Ong LY, Chua JH, et al. "Chinese fan spread" distraction technique of laparoscopic reduction of intussusception. JSLS, 2007,11(2):238-241.
[4]Sklar CM, Chan E, Nasr A. Laparoscopic versus open reduction of intussusception in children:a retrospective review and meta-analysis.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2014,24(7):518-522.
[5]Hill SJ, Koontz CS, Langness SM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open reduction of intussusception in children: experience over a decade. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2013,23(2):166-169.
[6]赵旭,黄卫东, 王俊,等.经腹腔镜治疗小儿难复性急性肠套叠12例.腹部外科, 2010,23(3):171-172.
[7]Cuckow PM, Slater RD, Najmaldin AS. Intussusception treated laparoscopically after failed air enema reduction. Surg Endosc, 1996,10(6):671-672.
[8]Apelt N, Featherstone N, Giuliani S. Laparoscopic treatment of intussusception in children: a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg, 2013,48(8):1789-1793.
[9]周致红,于文涛,曲金龙,等.微型腹腔镜下肠套叠复位术.中华小儿外科杂志,2006,27(9):496-497.
[10]李贵斌,邱云,李龙,等.腹腔镜手术治疗小儿肠套叠12例.中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(9):781-782.
[11]李学远,陈红兵,李健,等.12例经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗小儿肠套叠临床分析.第三军医大学学报,2013,35(16):1769-1770.
[12]Geltzeiler CB, Sims TL, Zigman AF. LAHRI: Laparoscopic-assisted hydrostatic reduction of intussusception. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2015,25(9):763-766.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，E-mail：xuwj@shchildren.com.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-07-14