[1]艾克拜尔 李俊红 木拉提＊.冠状动脉旁路移植术中内镜获取大隐静脉疗效的meta分析[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(12):1135-1143.
　Akbar,Li Junhong,Murat..A Metaanalysis for Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting in Great Saphenous Vein in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2014,14(12):1135-1143.
点击复制

冠状动脉旁路移植术中内镜获取大隐静脉疗效的meta分析()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
14
期数:
2014年12期
页码:
1135-1143
栏目:
Meta分析
出版日期:
2014-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Metaanalysis for Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting in Great Saphenous Vein in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
作者:
艾克拜尔 李俊红 木拉提＊
新疆医科大学第一附属医院心脏外科，乌鲁木齐830054
Author(s):
Akbar;  Li Junhong;  Murat.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
关键词:
内镜; 大隐静脉; 冠状动脉旁路移植术
Keywords:
Endoscope; Great saphenous vein; Coronary artery bypass grafting
分类号:
R654.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的系统评价冠状动脉旁路移植术(coronary artery bypass grafting, CABG)中应用内镜获取大隐静脉的安全性。方法计算机检索Cochrane Library（2012年第2期）、Pubmed、Medline、EMbase、中国生物医学文献数据库（CBM）、中国期刊全文数据库（CNKI）、数字化期刊数据库（万方）、中文科技期刊全文数据库（维普）等数据库，查找自建库至2013年9月，检索语种不受限制，收集有关GABG术中内镜获取大隐静脉疗效和安全性的随机对照试验，由2位评价者根据纳入、排除标准独立选择文献，评价纳入研究的方法学质量，然后采用RevMan5.2软件进行meta分析。结果共纳入12篇RCT文献，共1510例，其中内镜组857例，切开组653例。meta分析显示：与切开组比较，内镜组术后切口感染率低（OR=0.24，95% CI：016~0.36，P<0.0001），术后疼痛发生率低（OR=-1.06，95% CI ：-126~-0.86，P<0.0001），术后并发症发生率低（OR=0.28，95% CI：0.19~0.42，P<0.0001）；2组住院时间（WMD=0.17，95% CI：-0.22~0.56，P=0.40）、死亡率无统计学差异（OR=088，95% CI： 0.30~2.64，P=0.82）。结论CABG中应用内镜采集大隐静脉能够减少创伤，明显降低术后下肢感染，术后疼痛、术后并发症及住院时间下降，尤其适用于存在高危因素的患者。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo review systemically the safety of endoscopic vessel harvesting(EVH) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). MethodsBy searching documentations in the Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Medline,EMbase, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang database, and Weipu database, with no limits for language, a randomcontrolled metaanalysis was assembled for evaluating the safety of EVH of great saphenous veins in CABG. The retrieval deadline of these databases was September 2013. Two evaluators were in charge of selecting, extracting, and assessing the quality of methodology in all these articles according to extract criterion independently. The RevMan 5.2 was used for metaanalyse. ResultsThe whole test included 12 RCTs and 1510 patients, comprising of 857 patients with EVH and 653 patients with traditional harvesting. As compared with traditional group, the EVH group showed lower rate of postoperative incision infection ［OR=0.24, 95% CI:0.16-0.36, P<0.0001］, less postoperative pain ［OR=-1.06, 95% CI:-1.26--0.86, P<0.0001］, and less postoperative complications ［OR=0.28, 95% CI:0.19-0.42, P<00001］. There were no significant differences between the two groups in hospital stay ［WMD=0.17, 95% CI:-0.22-0.56, P=0.40］ and mortality ［OR=0.88, 95% CI:0.30-2.64, P=0.82］. ConclusionEVH factually reduces trauma in CABG, postoperative infection rate, postoperative pain, postoperative complications, and hospital stay,being applicable for high risk patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]WipkeTevis DD, Stotts NA, Skov P, et al. Frequency, manifestations, and correlates of impaired healing of saphenous vein harvest incisions. Heart Lung,1996,25(2):108-116.
[2]Slaughter MS, Olson MM, Lee JJ, et al. A fifteenyear wound surveillance study after coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg,1993,56(5):1063-1068.
[3]Lumsden AB, Eaves FR, Ofenloch JC, et al. Subcutaneous, videoassisted saphenous vein harvest: report of the first 30 cases. Cardiovasc Surg,1996,4(6):771-776.
[4]Allen K, Cheng D, Cohn W, et al. Endoscopic vascular harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: A Consensus Statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2005. Innovations (Phila),2005,1(2):51-60.
[5]Bonde P, Graham AN, Macgowan SW. Endoscopic vein harvest: advantages and limitations. Ann Thorac Surg,2004,77(6):2076-2082.
[6]Hayward TR, Hey LA, Newman LL, et al. Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest: the effect on postoperative outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg,1999,68(6):2107-2111.
[7]Au WK, Chiu SW, Sun MP, et al. Improved leg wound healing with endoscopic saphenous vein harvest in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective randomized study in Asian population. J Card Surg,2008,23(6):633-637.
[8]Allen KB, Griffith GL, Heimansohn DA, et al. Endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg,1998,66(1):26-32.
[9]Andreasen JJ, Korsager B, Alstrup P, et al. Postoperative wound infection: indicator of clinical quality? Dan Med Bull,2002,49(3):242-244.
[10]Carbino B, Kirmani B, Sogliani F. Should asymptomatic bronchogenic cysts in adults be treated conservatively or with surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2000,11(5):649-659.
[11]Schurr UP, Lachat ML, Reuthebuch O, et al. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for CABG-a randomized, prospective trial. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2002,50(3):160-163.
[12]Yun KL, Wu Y, Aharonian V, et al. Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: sixmonth patency rates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2005,129(3):496-503.
[13]Isgro F, Weisse U, Voss B, et al. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting: is there an improvement of the results with the endoscopic approach? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,1999,16 (Suppl 2):S58-S60.
[14]Perrault LP, Jeanmart H, Bilodeau L, et al. Early quantitative coronary angiography of saphenous vein grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting harvested by means of open versus endoscopic saphenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2004,127(5):1402-1407.
[15]Kiaii B, Moon BC, Massel D, et al. A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2002,123(2):204-212.
[16]Puskas JD, Wright CE, Miller PK, et al. A randomized trial of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest in coronary bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg,1999,68(4):1509-1512.
[17]闫炀，何勇，耿希刚，等. 内窥镜采集大隐静脉行冠状动脉旁路移植术1年随访. 中华胸心血管外科杂志,2012,28(1):28-31.
[18]GarciaAltes A, Peiro S. A systematic review of costeffectiveness evidence of endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: is it efficient? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2011,41(6):831-836.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
＊通讯作者，Email：murat_vakeli@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-12-20