[1]陈德兴刘文超朱修全①王婷婷张俏张海铅陈墨.继发性胆总管结石的胆囊管局部解剖与经胆囊管探查胆道的可行性研究:附100例报告[J].中国微创外科杂志,2025,01(3):135-140.
　Chen Dexing*,Liu Wenchao*,Zhu Xiuquan,et al.Anatomical Localization of the Gallbladder Duct and Feasibility Study on Bile Duct Exploration Through the Cyctic Duct for Secondary Choledocholithiasis: Report of 100 Cases[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2025,01(3):135-140.
点击复制

继发性胆总管结石的胆囊管局部解剖与经胆囊管探查胆道的可行性研究:附100例报告()

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2025年3期
页码:
135-140
栏目:
临床论著
出版日期:
2025-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Anatomical Localization of the Gallbladder Duct and Feasibility Study on Bile Duct Exploration Through the Cyctic Duct for Secondary Choledocholithiasis: Report of 100 Cases
作者:
陈德兴刘文超朱修全①王婷婷张俏张海铅陈墨
(吉林省前卫医院普外一科，长春130012)
Author(s):
Chen Dexing*;  Liu Wenchao*;  Zhu Xiuquan;  et al.
*Department of General Surgery, Jilin Province Qianwei Hospital, Changchun 130012, China
关键词:
胆囊管; 胆道探查术; 继发性胆总管结石; 腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆道探查取石
Keywords:
Cystic duct; Bile duct exploration; Secondary choledocholithiasis; Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨胆囊管局部解剖特点和经胆囊管探查胆道取石、一期缝合术的可行性。方法2023年2～9月我科对100例继发性胆总管结石行腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆道探查取石术(laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration，LTCBDE)，术中对胆囊管汇入胆总管方位、胆囊管内径、胆囊管的切开长度、胆囊管与胆总管并行长度、切开的胆囊管或胆总管与十二脂肠上缘距离、胆道镜取石直径6项指标进行测量。结果胆囊管注入胆总管方位：9～12点92例，其中10、11点76例，占76%；1、2点各1例，占2%；7、8点分别为2、4例，占6%。胆囊管内径3～13 mm，中位数5.0 mm。切开胆总管长度：21例(占21%)切开胆总管，切开长度1～5 mm，中位数3.0 mm。胆囊管与胆总管并行长度：36例并行，并行长度2～40 mm，中位数10.0 mm。切开的胆囊管或胆总管距十二脂肠上缘距离5～20 mm，中位数15.0 mm。90例术中胆道镜取出结石，共取出结石128枚，结石直径1.5～22.0 mm，中位数5.0 mm。100例LTCBDE均获成功。术后3个月随访83例(占83%)，出院后食欲恢复正常，恢复正常生活和工作，无腹痛、黄疸、发热等胆管结石症状发生，肝功能正常, B超示胆总管直径5～10 mm，中位数7 mm，无术后狭窄。结论经胆囊管探查胆总管可行，对胆总管无或较小的损伤，对Oddi括约肌无损伤，是继发性胆总管结石腹腔镜下胆道镜探查取石的最佳路径和术式。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the local anatomical characteristics of the cyctic duct and the feasibility of bile duct exploration through the cystic duct for stone removal and primary suture.MethodsFrom February to September 2023, 100 cases of secondary choledocholithiasis (SCL) were treated with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE). During the operation, 6 indicators were measured, including the direction of the gallbladder duct joining the common bile duct, the inner diameter of the gallbladder duct, the length of the gallbladder duct incision, the length of the gallbladder duct parallel to the common bile duct, the distance between the incised gallbladder duct or common bile duct and the upper edge of the duodenum, and the diameter of the stone taken by the cholangioscopy.ResultsThe direction of the gallbladder duct joining into the common bile duct: 92 cases at 9-12 o’clock, of which 76 cases at 10 and 11 o’clock, accounting for 76%; 1 case each at 1 and 2 o’clock, accounting for 2%; 2 and 4 cases at 7 and 8 o’clock respectively, accounting for 6%. The inner diameter of the cystic duct ranged from 3 mm to 13 mm, with a median of 5.0 mm. The length of the common bile duct opened: 21 cases (21%) had the common bile duct cut open, with an incision of 1-5 mm and a median of 3.0 mm. The parallel length of gallbladder duct and common bile duct: there was a parallel length of 2-40 mm and a median of 10.0 mm in 36 cases. The distance between the incised gallbladder duct or common bile duct and the upper edge of the duodenum was 5-20 mm, with a median of 15.0 mm. Intraoperative choledochoscope was used in 90 cases to remove stones, with a total of 128 stones removed. The diameter of the stones ranged from 1.5 mm to 22.0 mm, with a median of 50 mm. All the 100 cases of LTCBDE were successful. A total of 83 cases (83%) were followed up for 3 months after surgery. After discharge, their appetite returned to normal, and they resumed normal life and work. There were no symptoms of bile duct stones such as abdominal pain, jaundice, or fever, and their liver function was normal. Bultrasound showed a diameter of 5-10 mm for the common bile duct, with a median of 7 mm, and no postoperative stenosis.ConclusionsExploring the common bile duct through the cystic duct is feasible, with no or minimal damage to the common bile duct and no damage to the Oddi sphincter. It is the best way and surgical technique for laparoscopic exploration and stone removal via choledochoscope in SCL.

参考文献/References:

[1] 董佳纯,赵淑清，陈德兴.胆道镜在腹腔镜胆管结石手术中的临床应用.中国内镜杂志,2003,9(1):91-92.
[2] 陈德兴,董家纯,赵淑清,等.胆管结石的腹腔镜手术治疗.中国微创外科杂志，2003,3(1):24-25.
[3] 丁文辉,刘黎明,杨庭松.腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合胆道镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石疗效.山西医药杂志,2022,51(6):606-610.
[4] 李立波,蔡秀军,魏琪.腹腔镜胆总管探查术后不留置T管引流的临床研究.中华普通外科杂志,2004,19(2):79-81.
[5] 余海峰,张乔迁.腹腔镜经胆囊管胆道镜取石治疗胆总管结石的临床研究.肝胆外科杂志,2021,29(4):297-299，304.
[6] 陈明,伍三兰.三种联合术式治疗胆总管结石的临床疗效及安全性比较.中华普通外科杂志,2020,14(3):306-309.
[7] 洪晟乾,祁付珍,严雨楼，等.腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管取石与胆总管切开取石治疗胆总管结石的对比.肝胆外科杂志,2022,30(3):204-208.
[8] 范志勇,李晖,刘银.腹腔镜经胆囊管汇合部微切开胆总管探查术治疗胆总管结石的临床研究.腹腔镜外科杂志,2023,28(8):588-592，598.
[9] 郭张有,尹灿，涂兵.腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆道探查与腹腔镜下胆总管切开胆道探查治疗胆总管结石的Meta 分析.中国普通外科杂志,2020,28(8):910-922.
[10] 陈德兴.保留奥迪括约肌功能的临床价值与胆总管结石术式选择思考.中华腔镜外科杂志（电子版）,2022,15(5):257-260.
[11] 朱安东，陈德兴.腹腔镜在再次胆道手术中的应用.中国微创外科杂志，2008，8(1)：44-45.
[12] 陶永泽,陈德兴，李海滨，等.腹腔镜下经胆囊管切开取石与胆总管切开取石胆道一期缝合术的对比研究.中国微创外科杂志,2013,13(10):869-872.
[13] 张启瑜,主编.钱礼手术外科学.第2版.北京：人民卫生出版社，2017.500.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者，Email：jlchendexing@163.com①（吉林省抚松县人民医院普外科，抚松134500）
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-05-21