[1]李欣姚响芸①梅放②于波①黄九平①宋世兵.最大径≤4 cm甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤恶性风险预测因素的多因素分析[J].中国微创外科杂志,2025,01(3):129-134.
　Li Xin*,Yao Xiangyun,Mei Fang,et al.Multivariate Analysis on Predictive Factors of Malignant Risk for Follicular Thyroid Neoplasms With a Maximum Diameter≤4 cm[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2025,01(3):129-134.
点击复制

最大径≤4 cm甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤恶性风险预测因素的多因素分析()

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2025年3期
页码:
129-134
栏目:
临床论著
出版日期:
2025-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Multivariate Analysis on Predictive Factors of Malignant Risk for Follicular Thyroid Neoplasms With a Maximum Diameter≤4 cm
作者:
李欣姚响芸①梅放②于波①黄九平①宋世兵
(北京大学第三医院普通外科，北京100191)
Author(s):
Li Xin*;  Yao Xiangyun;  Mei Fang;  et al.
*Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
关键词:
甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤; 超声; 甲状腺滤泡癌; 甲状腺滤泡性腺瘤; 预测因素
Keywords:
Follicular thyroid neoplasms; Ultrasonography; Follicular thyroid carcinoma; Follicular thyroid adenoma; Predictive factors
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨最大径≤4 cm的甲状腺滤泡性肿瘤(follicular thyroid neoplasms，FTN)恶性风险的预测因素，为FTN患者的术前诊断及个体化治疗提供依据。方法回顾性分析2018年1月~2023年12月我院收治的肿瘤最大径≤4 cm的FTN患者的临床资料。根据术后病理诊断将患者分为甲状腺滤泡癌(follicular thyroid carcinoma，FTC)组和甲状腺滤泡性腺瘤(follicular thyroid adenoma，FTA)组，通过单因素分析和多因素logistic回归分析，探讨FTN恶性风险的预测因素。结果共纳入870例，FTA组745例(85.6%)，FTC组125例(14.4%)。单因素分析显示，年龄、性别、BMI、是否合并桥本氏甲状腺炎、结节数量和位置、结节最大径、结节内部结构和内部血流信号差异无显著性(P>0.05)，结节回声、边缘、声晕、纵横比和钙化差异有显著性(P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示，结节边缘不规则（OR=3.061，95% CI：1.653~5.667，P=0.000）、不等厚声晕（OR=5.868，95% CI：1.258~27.377，P=0.024）和边缘弧形钙化（OR=4.364，95% CI：1.329~14.333，P=0.015）是FTN恶性风险的预测因素。结论超声征象对评价FTN的良恶性有一定的价值，对结节边缘、声晕和钙化的仔细评估，能够促进较小FTN的早期诊断和治疗。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate predictive factors of malignant risk for follicular thyroid neoplasms (FTN) with a maximum diameter ≤ 4 cm, providing evidence for preoperative diagnosis and individualized treatment for FTN patients.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data of FTN patients with a maximum tumor diameter ≤ 4 cm treated at our hospital between January 2018 and December 2023. Based on postoperative pathological diagnosis, the patients were divided into follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) group and follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA) group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore predictive factors of malignant risk of FTN.ResultsA total of 870 patients were included, comprising of 745 patients (85.6%) in the FTA group and 125 patients (14.4%) in the FTC group. The univariate analysis showed that age, gender, BMI, comorbidity of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, number and location of nodules, the maximum diameter of nodules, internal structure of nodules, and internal blood flow signals had no significant differences (P>0.05), while nodule echogenicity, margins, halo, tallerthanwide shape, and calcification had significant differences (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that irregular margins (OR=3.061, 95%CI: 1.653-5.667,P=0.000), uneven thickness of the halo (OR=5.868, 95%CI: 1.258-27.377, P=0024), and peripheral rim calcification (OR=4.364, 95%CI: 1.329-14.333, P=0.015) were predictive factors of malignant risk for FTC.ConclusionsUltrasound features have certain value for evaluating benign or malignant nature of FTN. Careful assessment of nodule margins, halo, and calcification can facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of small FTN.

参考文献/References:

[1] Fan Y, Zheng X, Xu T, et al. A bibliometric analysis of follicular thyroid carcinoma: Current situation, hot spots, and global trends. Asian J Surg,2024:S1015-9584(24)01644-0.
[2] Cipriani NA, Nagar S, Kaplan SP, et al. Follicular thyroid carcinoma: how have histologic diagnoses changed in the last halfcentury and what are the prognostic implications? Thyroid,2015,25(11):1209-1216.
[3] 曾焕虹,黄东航.颈前入路充气法单孔腔镜辅助甲状腺手术与传统开放手术的对比研究.中国微创外科杂志,2023,23(7):502-506.
[4] 殷照才,陈剑平.经口入路腔镜甲状腺手术的发展现状.中国微创外科杂志,2021,21(5):442-445.
[5] 中华医学会内分泌学分会,中华医学会外科学分会甲状腺及代谢外科学组,中国抗癌协会头颈肿瘤专业委员会,等.甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌诊治指南(第二版).中华内分泌代谢杂志,2023,39(3):181-226.
[6] Lin Y, Lai S, Wang P, et al. Performance of current ultrasoundbased malignancy risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules in patients with follicular neoplasms. Eur Radiol,2022,32(6):3617-3630.
[7] Dionigi G, Kraimps JL, Schmid KW, et al. Minimally invasive follicular thyroid cancer (MIFTC)-A consensus report of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons(ESES). Langenbecks Arch Surg,2014,399(2):165-184.
[8] Lloyd RV, Osamura R, Klppel G, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organs. In: WHO Classification of Tumours. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2017.https:∥publications.iarc.fr/BookAndReportSeries/WhoClassification OfTumours/WHOClassificationOfTumoursOfEndocrineOrgans2017.
[9] Zhang F, Mei F, Chen W, et al. Role of ultrasound and ultrasoundbased prediction model in differentiating follicular thyroid carcinoma from follicular thyroid adenoma. J Ultrasound Med,2024,43(8):1389-1399.
[10] Li J, Li C, Zhou X, et al. US risk stratification system for follicular thyroid neoplasms. Radiology,2023,309(2):e230949.
[11] Xu R, Wen W, Zhang Y, et al. Diagnostic significance of ultrasound characteristics in discriminating follicular thyroid carcinoma from adenoma. BMC Med Imaging,2024,24(1):299.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通讯作者，Email:shibingsong_puth@126.com①超声医学科②病理科
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-05-21