[1]冯海龙 邢林帅 雒红涛 许召君 王高翔 赫鹏*.改良预防性回肠造口术在中低位直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2024,01(9):617-622.
　Feng Hailong,Xing Linshuai,Luo Hongtao,et al.Modified Prophylactic Ileostomy in Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for Midlow Rectal Cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2024,01(9):617-622.
点击复制

改良预防性回肠造口术在中低位直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术中的应用()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2024年9期
页码:
617-622
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2024-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Modified Prophylactic Ileostomy in Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for Midlow Rectal Cancer
作者:
冯海龙 邢林帅 雒红涛 许召君 王高翔 赫鹏*
(新乡医学院第一附属医院结直肠外科，卫辉453100)
Author(s):
Feng Hailong;  Xing Linshuai;  Luo Hongtao;  et al.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, China
关键词:
直肠癌; 预防性回肠造口术; 经自然腔道取标本手术
Keywords:
Rectal cancer; Prophylactic ileostomy; Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨改良预防性回肠造口术在中低位直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术(natural orifice specimen extraction surgery，NOSES)中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析2017年9月~2023年5月我院63例中低位直肠癌NOSES行预防性回肠造口术，根据造口方式的不同，分为观察组(改良回肠造口术，n=31)和对照组(常规襻式回肠造口，n=32)，比较2组造口时间、造口还纳手术时间、术后造口早期并发症(造口渗漏、周围皮炎、疼痛、周围trocar孔感染、出血、缺血坏死、水肿、周围皮肤黏膜分离及近端肠梗阻)和远期并发症(造口狭窄、回缩、脱垂、旁疝)、肿瘤复发及死亡情况。结果63例均顺利完成预防性回肠造口术及造口还纳手术。观察组造口手术时间中位数7(6，8)min，明显短于对照组23(21，24)min(Z=-6.853，P=0.000)；观察组造口还纳手术时间(63.2±5.7)min，明显短于对照组(93.5±4.7)min (t=-23.109，P=0.000)。2组均无造口出血、坏死。观察组造口疼痛发生率明显低于对照组［6.4%(2/31) vs.65.6%(21/32), χ2=21.766,P=0.000］；观察组造口周围trocar孔感染发生率显著低于对照组［0%(0/31) vs.53.1%(17/32),P=0.000］。2组均无造口狭窄发生；造口旁疝3例，其中观察组1例，对照组2例，2组发生率差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)；对照组1例造口回缩，1例造口脱垂。5例并发症均在二次还纳手术中得到及时治疗。63例随访6~60个月，均无肿瘤复发或死亡。结论中低位直肠癌NOSES中应用改良预防性回肠造口术安全、可行，操作简便，有一定的实用性及推广价值。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the application value of modified prophylactic ileostomy in natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for patients with midlow rectal cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 63 patients who received prophylactic ileostomy in NOSES for midlow rectal cancer in our hospital from September 2017 to May 2023. The patients were divided into the observation group (those who received modified ileostomy, n=31) and the control group (those who received conventional loop ileostomy, n=32) according to different ostomy methods. The operation time of ostomy, operation time of ostomy reversal surgery, earlystage complications (stoma leakage, peristomal dermatitis, stoma pain, peristomal trocar hole infection, stoma bleeding, stoma ischaemic necrosis, stoma oedema, peristoma skinmucosal separation and stoma proximal bowel obstruction) and longstage complications (stoma stenosis, stoma retraction, stoma prolapse, parastomal hernia), tumor recurrence and death of the two groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsBoth prophylactic ileostomy and ostomy reversal surgery were successfully completed in all the 63 cases. The operation time of ostomy in the observation group was 7 (6-8) min, which was significantly shorter than that of 23(21-24) min in the control group (Z=-6.853, P=0.000), and the operation time of ostomy reversal surgery in the observation group was (63.2±5.7) min, which was significantly shorter than (93.5±4.7) min in the control group (t=-23.109, P=0000). Neither stoma bleeding nor stoma ischaemic necrosis were observed in both groups. The incidence of stoma pain in the observation group was lower than that in the control group ［6.4%(2/31) vs. 65.6%(21/32), χ2=21.766, P=0.000］. The incidence of peristomal incision infection in the observation group was lower than that in the control group ［0% (0/31) vs. 53.1% (17/32), P=0.000］. There was no stoma stenosis in both groups. There were 3 cases of parastomal hernia, 1 case in the observation group and 2 cases in the control group, the difference of the incidence being not statistically significant (P=1.000). There was 1 case of stoma retraction and 1 case of stoma prolapse in the control group. All the 5 cases with complications received prompt treatment in the second ostomy reversal surgery. Followup visits for 6-60 months in the 63 cases showed no tumor recurrence or death.ConclusionModified prophylactic ileostomy in NOSES for patients with midlow rectal cancer is safe, feasible, and easy to operate, having certain practicality and promotion value.

参考文献/References:

[1]Guan X, Hu X, Jiang Z, et al. Shortterm and oncological outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer in China: a national database study of 5055 patients. Sci Bull (Beijing),2022,67(13):1331-1334.
[2]Bennis M, Parc Y, Lefevre JH, et al. Morbidity risk factors after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and coloanal anastomosis: a retrospective series of 483 patients. Ann Surg,2012,255(3):504-510.
[3]Mrak K, Jagoditsch M, Eberl T, et al. Longterm quality of life in pouch patients compared with stoma patients following rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis,2011,13(12):e403-e410.
[4]楼征,张卫.中国直肠癌手术吻合口漏诊断预防及处理专家共识2019版解读.临床外科杂志,2020,28(1):41-42.
[5]赵玉洲,韩广森,马鹏飞,等.一针法预防性回肠造口在直肠癌低位前切除手术中的应用.中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2020,9(2):157-161.
[6]Peng D, Yu DL, Liu XY, et al. Does temporary ileostomy via specimen extraction site affect the short outcomes and complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients? A propensity score matching analysis. BMC Surg,2022,22(1):263.
[7]白峻阁,王哲学,杨明,等.腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术经预防性回肠造口部位取标本的可行性及对造口还纳的影响.结直肠肛门外科,2023,29(5):443-448,454.
[8]王锡山,主编.经自然腔道取标本手术学——腹盆腔肿瘤.第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2020.38-40.
[9]杨斌,周声宁,韩方海,等.直肠癌手术预防性回肠造口并发症的预防和处理.结直肠肛门外科,2020,26(5):548-552.
[10]张丽,陈晓玲.肠造口狭窄预防及治疗中循证护理的应用.实用临床医药杂志,2012,16(18):15-17.
[11]宫向前,张华平,张波,等.结肠造口回缩原因及防治的探讨.肿瘤防治杂志,2005,12(2):139-140.
[12]徐悦洋,卫莉,杨长永.预防性肠造口术后造口脱垂的原因分析与护理.护士进修杂志,2018,33(19):1779-1781.
[13]唐健雄,顾岩,李绍春.造口旁疝诊断和治疗中值得关注的若干问题.中国实用外科杂志,2022,42(7):730-733.
[14]Sharma A, Deeb AP, Rickles AS, et al. Closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy is associated with considerable morbidity. Colorectal Dis,2013,15(4):458-462.
[15]Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, et al. Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.Br J Surg,2005,92(9):1137-1142.
[16]吴红杰,邹小明.结直肠癌术后吻合口瘘的诊治及预防.中华结直肠疾病电子杂志,2016,5(2):171-174.
[17]刘强,王吉胜,陈红兵.中低位直肠癌微创治疗方兴未艾：NOSES的现状和展望.中国微创外科杂志,2023,23(1):55-59.
[18]Pace U, Rega D, Scala D, et al. Skin bridge loop ileostomy: technical details.Tech Coloproctol,2014,18(9):855-856.
[19]Carannante F, Mascianà G, Lauricella S, et al. Skin bridge loop stoma: outcome in 45 patients in comparison with stoma made on a plastic rod. Int J Colorectal Dis,2019,34(12):2195-2197.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email:hepeng163001@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-12-17