[1]文祖洲 叶赟 吴西智 周华 罗昂 陈洪强*.机器人导航下顺行通道经皮螺钉内固定治疗髋臼前柱骨折[J].中国微创外科杂志,2024,01(5):350-354.
　Wen Zuzhou,Ye Yun,Wu Xizhi,et al.Treatment of Acetabular Anterior Column Fractures With Antegrade Percutaneous Screw Fixation Under Robot Navigation[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2024,01(5):350-354.
点击复制

机器人导航下顺行通道经皮螺钉内固定治疗髋臼前柱骨折()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2024年5期
页码:
350-354
栏目:
短篇论著
出版日期:
2024-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Treatment of Acetabular Anterior Column Fractures With Antegrade Percutaneous Screw Fixation Under Robot Navigation
作者:
文祖洲 叶赟 吴西智 周华 罗昂 陈洪强*
（贵州医科大学临床医学院，贵阳550004）
Author(s):
Wen Zuzhou;  Ye Yun;  Wu Xizhi;  et al.
Department of Orthopedics, Guiyang Fourth People’s Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China
关键词:
机器人; 顺行通道; 经皮螺钉; 髋臼骨折
Keywords:
Robot; Antegrade passage; Percutaneous screw; Acetabular fracture
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨机器人导航下顺行通道经皮螺钉内固定治疗髋臼前柱骨折的临床疗效。方法2021年4月~2023年1月我科对7例髋臼前柱骨折，利用骨盆“双反”牵引床牵引复位，骨科机器人辅助设计规划螺钉进针点与方向，顺行通道空心螺钉内固定。结果手术时间60～95 min，平均78 min；术中出血量5～20 ml，平均8.6 ml；透视次数7～11次，平均8.7次；3例导针未调整，4例导针调整1~2次(调整1次2例，调整2次2例)；实际路径与规划偏离0.65~1.50 mm，(098±0.30)mm；螺钉位置优良率100%。术后48 h行X线和CT检查，根据Matta复位标准：解剖复位6例，满意复位1例。7例随访时间6～28个月，平均15个月。末次随访时髋关节Harris评分85～96分，平均91.6分；疼痛视觉模拟评分0分；均无感染、内置物松动、神经功能障碍等并发症。结论机器人导航下顺行通道经皮螺钉内固定治疗髋臼前柱骨折安全高效，效果满意。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of anterograde percutaneous screw fixation under robot navigation in the treatment of acetabular anterior column fractures.Methods A retrospective analysis was made on 7 cases of anterior acetabular column fractures from April 2021 to January 2023. The traction reduction was conducted by using pelvic “double reverse” traction table, the orthopedic robotassisted design was carried out to plan the screw entry point and direction, and the antegrade channel cannulated screw was used for internal fixation. ResultsThe operation time was 60-95 min (mean, 78 min). The intraoperative blood loss was 5-20 ml (mean, 8.6 ml). The number of fluoroscopy was 7-11 (mean, 8.7). The guide needle was unadjusted in 3 cases and adjusted for 1-2 times in 4 cases (once in 2 cases and twice in 2 cases). The actual path deviated from the planned by 0.65-1.50 mm (mean, 0.98±0.30 mm). The excellent and good rate of screw position was 100%. Xray and CT examinations were performed at 48 h after the operation. According to the Matta reduction standard, anatomical reduction was achieved in 6 cases and satisfactory reduction in 1 case. All the 7 cases were followed up for 6-28 months (mean, 15 months). At the last followup, the Harris score of the hip joint was 85-96 points (mean, 91.6 points) and the pain of visual analogue scale (VAS) was 0. There were no complications such as infection, loosening of internal fixation, or neurological dysfunction. ConclusionAnterograde percutaneous screw fixation under robot navigation in the treatment of acetabular anterior column fractures is safe, effective, and satisfactory.

参考文献/References:

[1]Brand A, von Rüden C, Probst C, et al. Early biomechanical outcome in patients with acetabular fractures treated using the pararectus approach: a gait and stair climb analysis study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg,2022,48(2):1307-1316.
[2]Letournel E. Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1980,(151):81-106.
[3]Baumann F, Schmitz P, Mahr D, et al. A guideline for placement of an infraacetabular screw based on anatomic landmarks via an intrapelvic approach. J Orthop Surg Res,2018,13(1):77.
[4]Reichel LM, MacCormick LM, Dugarte AJ, et al. Minimally invasive anterior pelvic internal fixation: An anatomic study comparing pelvic bridge to INFIX. Injury,2018,49(2):309-314.
[5]Eastridge BJ, Starr A, Minei JP, et al. The importance of fracture pattern in guiding therapeutic decisionmaking in patients with hemorrhagic shock and pelvic ring disruptions. J Trauma,2002,53(3):446-451.
[6]赵春鹏,王军强,苏永刚,等.机器人辅助经皮螺钉内固定治疗骨盆和髋臼骨折.北京大学学报(医学版),2017,49(2):274-280.
[7]Matta JM. Operative treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach: a 10year perspective. J Orthop Trauma,2006,20(1 Suppl):S20-S29.
[8]Gay SB, Sistrom C, Wang GJ, et al. Percutaneous screw fixation of acetabular fractures with CT guidance: preliminary results of a new technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol,1992,158(4):819-822.
[9]聂玉琪,汪国栋,孟乘飞,等.三维数字规划结合导航与单纯导航下经皮髋臼前柱螺钉内固定术的对比研究.中华创伤杂志,2017,33(1):51-56.
[10]Pavelka T, Saláek M, Dupa V. Causes of changes in the spectrum of acetabular fractures in the last 20 years. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech,2020,87(5):329-332.
[11]Liu Z, Gu Y, Jin X, et al. Comparison of outcomes following TiRobotassisted sacroiliac screw fixation with bone grafting and traditional screw fixation without bone grafting for unstable osteoporotic sacral fracture: A singlecenter retrospective study of 33 patients. Med Sci Monit,2021,27:e932724.
[12]Liu ZJ, Hu YC, Tian W, et al. Robotaided minimally invasive lumbopelvic fixation in treatment of traumatic spinopelvic dissociation. Orthop Surg,2021,13(2):563-572.
[13]赵春鹏,肖鸿鹄,汪凯文,等.骨科机器人辅助髋臼骨折微创手术的临床研究.中华创伤骨科杂志,2020,22(12):1021-1028.
[14]Liu ZJ, Gu Y, Jia J. The KocherLangenbeck approach combined with robotaided percutaneous anterior column screw fixation for transverseoriented acetabular fractures: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2022,23(1):345.
[15]Mouhsine E, Garofalo R, Borens O, et al. Percutaneous retrograde screwing for stabilisation of acetabular fractures. Injury,2005,36(11):1330-1336.
[16]Crowl AC, Kahler DM. Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures. Comput Aided Surg,2002,7(3):169-178.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email：chg3817119@sina.com ①
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-08-06