[1]姚颖 王一婷 杨俊芳 管祎琪 梅宇① 韩劲松 张坤**.自体腘绳肌腱植入手术治疗重度阴道前壁脱垂的中期疗效[J].中国微创外科杂志,2024,01(4):271-277.
　Yao Ying,Wang Yiting,Yang Junfang,et al.Midterm Efficacy of Autologous Hamstring Tendon Implantation in the Treatment of Severe Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2024,01(4):271-277.
点击复制

自体腘绳肌腱植入手术治疗重度阴道前壁脱垂的中期疗效()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2024年4期
页码:
271-277
栏目:
短篇论著
出版日期:
2024-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Midterm Efficacy of Autologous Hamstring Tendon Implantation in the Treatment of Severe Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
作者:
姚颖 王一婷 杨俊芳 管祎琪 梅宇① 韩劲松 张坤**
(北京大学第三医院妇产科国家妇产疾病临床医学研究中心，北京100191)
Author(s):
Yao Ying;  Wang Yiting;  Yang Junfang;  et al.
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital；National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China
关键词:
自体筋膜; 腘绳肌腱; 重度阴道前壁脱垂
Keywords:
Autologous fascia; Hamstring tendon; Severe anterior vaginal wall prolapse
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨自体腘绳肌腱植入治疗重度阴道前壁脱垂的安全性和中期疗效。方法本研究为单臂临床试验，2021年5月开始纳入有症状、要求手术治疗的以阴道前壁重度脱垂为主的盆腔器官脱垂(pelvic organ prolapse，POP)患者，经患者充分知情，自愿选择自体腘绳肌腱添加修补，同时行双侧高位骶韧带悬吊。术后随访盆腔器官脱垂定量分度(pelvic organ prolapse quantification, POPQ)、盆底不适调查表简表评分(Pelvic Floor Distress InventoryShort Form 20，PFDI20)、术后满意度评分、患者整体印象改善评分(Patient Global Impression of Improvement，PGII)。观察术后取腱侧下肢功能及术后并发症处理、再手术情况。结果取腱手术时间(19.7±8.3)min，盆底手术时间(122.1±37.8)min，术中出血量中位数70 ml（50~400 ml），无术中副损伤和术后病率。12例随访(26.4±2.5)月。Aa、Ba、C术前分别为3(-1~3)、5（2~10）、4（-1~10），术后24个月分别为-3（-3~3）、-3（-3~3）、-6（-6~3），差异有显著性（P<0.05）。12例术前、术后24个月PFDI20评分分别为88.0(16.7~204.2)、8.3(0~32.3)分，差异有显著性(Z=-2.803,P=0.005)；PGII问卷11例术后症状明显改善，1例有改善。术后6、24个月满意度评分分别为(4.8±0.4)分和(4.6±0.7)分。1例术后12个月自感阴道脱出物，阴道前壁及顶端脱垂Ⅲ度，复发率8.3%(1/12)。2例分别术后9 d、2周肺栓塞，ClavienDindo外科手术并发症分级分别为Ⅱ、Ⅲ级，分别门诊和住院治疗后痊愈。1例阴道顶端局部筋膜暴露，药物治疗好转。所有患者取腱部位切口愈合良好，肌力、下肢活动均正常。无因复发和筋膜条并发症再次手术。结论自体腘绳肌腱植入治疗重度阴道前壁脱垂手术安全，中期疗效满意。术前需向患者宣教下肢锻炼预防静脉血栓并发症。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the safety and midterm efficacy of autologous hamstring tendon implantation in the treatment of severe anterior vaginal wall prolapse.MethodsWe performed a prospective single arm clinical study. From May 2021, pelvic organ prolapse (POP) patients with severe anterior vaginal wall prolapse as the main cause who had symptoms and required surgical treatment were included. The patient was fully informed and voluntarily selected autologous hamstring tendon implantation and high sacral ligament suspension. Postoperative followups were carried out on the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ), Pelvic Floor Distress InventoryShort Form 20 (PFDI20), postoperative satisfaction score, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGII). Function of the lower limb on the tendon removal side, as well as postoperative complications and reoperations were recorded.ResultsThe operation time of tendon removal was (19.7±8.3) min, the operation time of pelvic floor was (1221±37.8) min, the median intraoperative bleeding volume was 70 ml (range,50-400 ml), and there was no intraoperative comorbidity or postoperative fever. A total of 12 cases were followed up for (26.4±2.5) months.The measured values of Aa, Ba, and C were 3(-1-3), 5(2-10), and 4(-1-10) before operation and -3(-3-3), -3(-3-3), and -6(-6-3) at 24 months after operation, respectively,with significant difference (P<0.05). The PFDI20 scores of the 12 patients before surgery and at 24 months after surgery were 880 points (range, 16.7-204.2 points) and 8.3 points (range, 0-32.3 points), respectively, with significant difference (Z=-2.803, P=0.005). The PGII questionnaire showed 11 patients with significant improvement in postoperative symptoms and 1 patient with improvement. The satisfaction scores at 6 and 24 months after surgery were (4.8±0.4) points and (46±0.7) points, respectively. One patient experienced vaginal prolapse at 12 months after surgery, with a Ⅲ degree prolapse of the anterior wall and vaginal vault, the recurrence rate being 8.3% (1/12). Two patients had pulmonary embolism at 9 d and 2 weeks after surgery, with ClavienDindo Ⅱ and Ⅲ grades, and recovered after outpatient and hospitalization treatment. One patient was found fascia exposure at the vagina, and had improvement with medication treatment. All the patients had good wound healing at the tendon removal site, with normal muscle strength and lower limb activity. No reoperation was required due to recurrence or complications of tendon surgery.ConclusionsAutologous hamstring tendon implantation is safe in the treatment of severe anterior vaginal wall prolapse with satisfactory midterm efficacy. Before surgery, it is necessary to educate patients on lower limb exercise to prevent complications of venous thrombosis.

参考文献/References:

[1]Larouche M, Geoffrion R, Walter JE. No. 351transvaginal mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2017,39(11):1085-1097.
[2]Chapple CR, Cruz F, Deffieux X, et al. Consensus statement of the European Urology Association and the European Urogynaecological Association on the use of implanted materials for treating pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol,2017,72(3):424-431.
[3]Abbott S, Unger CA, Evans JM, et al. Evaluation and management of complications from synthetic mesh after pelvic reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2014,210(2):163.e161-e168.
[4]U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA takes action to protect women’s health，orders manufacturers of surgical mesh intended for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse to stop selling all devices.https:∥www.fda.gov/newsevents/pressannouncements/fdatakesactionprotectwomenshealthordersmanufacturerssurgicalmeshintendedtransvaginal.
[5]Artsen AM, Rytel M, Liang R et al. Mesh induced fibrosis: The protective role of T regulatory cells. Acta Biomater,2019,96:203-210.
[6]李宇,张豪,肖世卓,等.LARS人工韧带与自体腘绳肌腱一期重建前后交叉韧带的疗效比较.中国修复重建外科杂志,2020,34(8):1018-1024.
[7]Ma Y, Xu T, Zhang Y, et al. Validation of the Chinese version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory20 (PFDI20) according to the COSMIN checklist. Int Urogynecol J,2019,30(7):1127-1139.
[8]Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGII) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J,2010,21(5):523-528.
[9]骆黎静, 卢丹, 段爱红,等.自体组织修补与经阴道植入网片盆底重建治疗盆腔器官脱垂的比较.中国微创外科杂志,2023,23(6):422-429.
[10]ToozsHobson P, Freeman R, Barber M, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J,2012,23(5):527-535.
[11]Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2016,2(2):CD012079.
[12]中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科盆底学组.盆腔器官脱垂的中国诊治指南(2020年版).中华妇产科杂志,2020,55(5):300-306.
[13]Yao Y, Zhang K, Han J, et al. Tissue reactions to heterogenic and allogeneic acellular dermal matrix mesh placed in the vesicovaginal space in a rabbit model. Gynecol Obstet Invest,2017,82(5):437-445.
[14]杨俊芳,韩劲松,张坤,等.猪小肠黏膜下层补片植入兔膀胱阴道间隙的转归研究.中华妇产科杂志,2020,55(2):120-124.
[15]曹婷婷,杨欣,孙秀丽,等.猪小肠黏膜下层生物补片治疗盆腔器官脱垂的手术疗效分析.中国妇产科临床杂志,2016,17(2):99-102.
[16]Alexandridis V, Teleman P, Rudnicki M. Efficacy and safety of pelvic organ prolapse surgery with porcine small intestinal submucosa graft implantation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2021,267:18-22.
[17]Coulam CB, Nichols VR, Pratt JH. Use of fascia lata in gynecologic surgery. Conn Med,1973,37(11):555-559.
[18]Chaus FM, Funk JT, Pangilinan J, et al. Total autologous fascia lata anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse repair: A new technique and initial experience. Urology,2020,137:190-195.
[19]Bock ME, Nagle R, Soyster M, et al. Robotic sacral colpopexy using autologous fascia lata compared with mesh. J Endourol,2021,35(6):801-807.
[20]Oliver JL, Chaudhry ZQ, Medendorp AR, et al. Complete excision of sacrocolpopexy mesh with autologous fascia sacrocolpopexy. Urology,2017,106:65-69.
[21]Seth J, Toia B, Ecclestone H, et al. The autologous rectus fascia sheath sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy, a mesh free alternative in patients with recurrent uterine and vault prolapse: A contemporary series and literature review. Urol Ann,2019,11(2):193-197.
[22]Mahendru R. An effective and safe innovation for the management of vault prolapse. Ann Surg Innov Res,2010,4:6.
[23]Asfour V, Nikolopoulos KI, Digesu GA, et al. Modified autologous fascial sling technique (‘sling on a string’) for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J,2022,33(2):435-438.
[24]Brown CH Jr, Steiner ME, Carson EW. The use of hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Technique and results. Clin Sports Med,1993,12(4):723-756.
[25]Cross MJ, Roger G, Kujawa P, et al. Regeneration of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons following their transection for repair of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med,1992,20(2):221-223.
[26]Xie X, Liu X, Chen Z, et al. A metaanalysis of bonepatellar tendonbone autograft versus fourstrand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee,2015,22(2):100-110.
[27]Hornemann A, Hoch B, Franz W, et al. Tendon incontinence repair-First experience with an autologous semitendinosus tendon transplant for urinary stress incontinence treatment. Urol Case Rep,2020,32:101257.
[28]Hornemann A, Weissenbacher T, Hoch B, et al. From thigh to pelvis: female genital prolapse repair with an autologous semitendinosus tendon transplant： Data of the German multicenter trial. Int Urogynecol J,2023,34(10):2373-2380.
[29]Stubbs MJ, Mouyis M, Thomas M. Deep vein thrombosis. BMJ,2018,360:k351.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：北京大学第三医院临床重点项目（BYSYFY2021028）**通讯作者，Email:bysyzk@163.com ①（北京大学第三医院运动医学科运动医学研究所，北京100191）
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-07-02