[1]李立帜 徐迪 林珊 林扬**.机器人辅助与单孔腹腔镜胆总管囊肿切除术的对比研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2023,01(7):497-501.
　Li Lizhi,Xu Di,Lin Shan,et al.Comparison Between Robotassisted and Singleport Laparoscopic Resection of Choledochal Cyst[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2023,01(7):497-501.
点击复制

机器人辅助与单孔腹腔镜胆总管囊肿切除术的对比研究()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2023年7期
页码:
497-501
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison Between Robotassisted and Singleport Laparoscopic Resection of Choledochal Cyst
作者:
李立帜 徐迪 林珊 林扬**
(福建医科大学省立临床医学院小儿外科，福州350001)
Author(s):
Li Lizhi;  Xu Di;  Lin Shan;  et al.
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Provincial Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China
关键词:
胆总管囊肿; 腹腔镜; 机器人; 肝总管空肠吻合术; 小儿
Keywords:
Choledochal cyst; Laparoscope; Robot; Hepatic ductjejunostomy; Children
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨机器人辅助腹腔镜胆总管囊肿切除术的临床效果。方法回顾性比较2020年10月~2022年6月我科21例机器人辅助(机器人组)与22例单孔腹腔镜胆总管囊肿切除术(腹腔镜组)的临床资料，比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流管留置时间、禁食时间、住院时间及手术费用。结果机器人组术中出血量［10.0(8.0,13.0)ml vs.150(11.8,18.0)ml，Z=-3.292，P=0.001］、引流管留置时间［5.0(4.5,6.0)d vs.7.0(5.8,8.2)d，Z=-3.256，P=0.001］、禁食时间［4.0(3.0,4.5)d vs.6.0(5.0,7.0)d，Z=-4.348，P=0.000］及住院时间［6.0(6.0,7.0)d vs. 8.0(6.0,9.3)d，Z=-3061，P=0.002］均明显短于腹腔镜组。机器人组手术时间［394.0(305.0,420.0)min vs.351.5(269.3,379.8)min，Z=-2.236,P=0.025］和住院综合费用［(7.92±0.39)万元vs.(3.11±0.30)万元,t=45.386,P=0.000］明显长于/高于腹腔镜组。术后并发症及疼痛评分2组比较无差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。所有患儿随访4~24个月，中位数13个月，无胆漏、胰漏、吻合口狭窄、胆管炎、胰腺炎、肠梗阻、切口感染和切口疝等并发症发生。结论机器人辅助腹腔镜胆总管囊肿切除术可以达到单孔腹腔镜手术同样的治疗效果。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of robotassisted laparoscopic resection of choledochal cyst.MethodsClinical data were retrospectively compared between 21 cases of robotassisted laparoscopic resection of choledochal cyst (robotic group) and 22 cases of singleport laparoscopic resection of choledochal cyst (laparoscopic group) in our department from October 2020 to June 2022. The duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drain indwelling time, fasting time, hospital stay, and surgical expenses were compared.ResultsThe intraoperative blood loss ［10.0 (8.0, 13.0) ml vs. 15.0 (118, 18.0) ml, Z=3.292, P=0.001］, drainage tube indwelling time ［5.0 (4.5, 6.0) d vs. 7.0 (5.8, 8.2) d, Z=-3.256, P=0.001］, fasting time ［4.0 (3.0, 4.5) d vs. 6.0 (5.0, 7.0) d, Z=-4.348, P=0.000］ and hospital stay ［6.0 (6.0, 7.0) d vs. 8.0 (6.0, 9.3) d, Z=-3.061, P=0.002］ in the robotic group were significantly less than those in the laparoscopic group. The operation time ［394.0 (305.0, 420.0) min vs. 351.5 (269.3, 379.8) min, Z=-2.236, P=0.025］ and hospitalization costs ［(792±0.39) ten thousand yuan vs. (3.11±0.30) ten thousand yuan, t=45.386, P=0.000］ of the robotic group were significantly longer or higher than those of the laparoscopic group. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications and pain scores between the two groups (P>0.05). All the children were regularly followed up for 4-24 months, with a median of 13 months. There were no complications such as biliary leakage, pancreatic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, cholangitis, pancreatitis, intestinal obstruction, incision infection or incision hernia.ConclusionRobotassisted laparoscopic resection of choledochal cyst achieves the same treatment effect as singleport laparoscopic surgery.

参考文献/References:

[1]Hartrick CT, Kovan JP. Pain assessment following general anesthesia using the Toddler Preschooler Postoperative Pain Scale: a comparative study. J Clin Anesth,2002,14(6):411-415.
[2]Farello GA, Cerofolini A, Rebonato M, et al. Congenital choledochal cyst: videoguided laparoscopic treatment. SurgLaparosc Endosc,1995,5(5):354-358.
[3]Woo R, Le D, Albanese CT, et al. Robotassisted laparoscopic resection of a type I choledochal cyst in a child. J LaparoendoscAdvSurg Tech A,2006,16(2):179-183.
[4]Wen Z, Liang H, Liang J, et al. Evaluation of the learning curve of laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision and RouxenY hepaticojejunostomy in children: CUSUM analysis of a single surgeon’s experience. Surg Endosc,2017,31(2):778-787.
[5]Lee H, Kwon W, Han Y, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes of intracorporealhepaticojejunostomy in the excision of choledochal cysts using laparoscopic versus robot techniques. Ann Surg Treat Res,2018,94(4):190-195.
[6]董露露,楚泽浩,崔西春,等.达芬奇机器人与传统腹腔镜在治疗小儿先天性胆总管囊肿的对比研究.中华小儿外科杂志,2021,42(1):17-22.
[7]谢钧韬,李作青,陈华东,等.达芬奇机器人手术治疗儿童胆总管囊肿的初步报告.中华小儿外科杂志,2018,39(3):200-203.
[8]Wang XQ, Xu SJ, Wang Z, et al. Roboticassisted surgery for pediatric choledochal cyst: Case report and literature review. World J Clin Cases,2018,6(7):143-149.
[9]蔡建鹏,陈伟,陈流华,等.达芬奇机器人在胆总管囊肿手术切除中的应用.中华普通外科学文献(电子版),2019,13(3):194-197.
[10]Xie X, Li K, Wang J, et al. Comparison of pediatric choledochal cyst excisions with open procedures, laparoscopic procedures and robotassisted procedures: a retrospective study. Surg Endosc,2020,34(7):3223-3231.
[11]林珊,何少华,李立帜,等.经脐单孔加一达芬奇机器人在儿童先天性胆总管囊肿手术中应用观察.中华医学杂志,2021,101(44):3655-3659.
[12]林扬,徐迪,林珊,等.机器人辅助腹腔镜小儿肾盂输尿管离断成形术16例.中国微创外科杂志,2022,22(7):536-539.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：福建省自然科学基金（2022J011010）；福建省卫计委医学创新课题（2020CXB004）**通讯作者，Email:yanglin@fjmu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-10-10