[1]赵中凯 王晔 刘鑫 俎明 张静 丁士刚*.内镜黏膜下剥离与外科手术治疗早期胃癌的疗效与安全性分析[J].中国微创外科杂志,2023,01(6):416-421.
　Zhao Zhongkai,Wang Ye,Liu Xin,et al.Comparison Study of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgical Treatment for Early Gastric Cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2023,01(6):416-421.
点击复制

内镜黏膜下剥离与外科手术治疗早期胃癌的疗效与安全性分析()

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2023年6期
页码:
416-421
栏目:
临床论著
出版日期:
2023-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison Study of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgical Treatment for Early Gastric Cancer
作者:
赵中凯 王晔 刘鑫 俎明 张静 丁士刚*
(北京大学第三医院消化科，北京100191)
Author(s):
Zhao Zhongkai;  Wang Ye;  Liu Xin;  et al.
Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
关键词:
早期胃癌; 内镜黏膜下剥离术; 外科手术; 有效性; 安全性
Keywords:
Early gastric cancer; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Surgery; Efficacy; Safety
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的比较内镜黏膜下剥离(endoscopic submucosal dissection，ESD)与外科手术治疗早期胃癌的安全性和预后。方法收集2010年1月~2018年10月我院因早期胃癌行ESD 213例以及外科手术209例的临床资料，进行倾向性评分匹配，2组各95例，比较ESD及外科手术的安全性及预后。结果①原始队列中，ESD组中位随访时间21(10，46)月，外科手术组54(30，85)月(Z=-8.985，P=0.000)，ESD组与外科手术组总生存率无显著差异(97.6% vs. 96.5%，logrank χ2=0772，P=0.380)，但无复发生存率显著低于外科手术组(94.8% vs. 98.4%，logrank χ2=4.667，P=0.031)。经倾向性评分匹配后，ESD组与外科手术组的总生存率和无复发生存率均无显著差异(100% vs. 97.4%，logrank χ2=0.671，P=0.413；986% vs. 97.7%，logrank χ2=0.023，P=0.879)。②原始队列中，ESD组手术时间显著小于外科手术组［58(55，90)min vs. 270(210，315)min，Z=-15.974，P=0.000］，住院日较外科手术组显著缩短［11(9，13)d vs. 18(14，22)d，Z=-13.428，P=0000］，术后转入ICU的比例显著低于外科手术组［1.4%(3/213) vs. 18.2%(38/209)， χ2=33.835，P=0.000］，倾向性评分匹配后这些指标2组差异仍有统计学意义(均P=0.000)。结论ESD与外科手术治疗早期胃癌的远期疗效相当，且ESD手术时间短，术后进ICU比例低，住院日短。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the safety and longterm outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgical resection for early gastric cancer (EGC).MethodsClinical data of 213 EGC patients who underwent ESD and 209 EGC patients who underwent surgical resection were retrospectively collected. After propensityscore matching, 95 patients in the ESD group and 95 patients in the surgical resection group were finally matched. The safety and longterm outcomes were compared between the two groups.Results①Before propensityscore matching, the median followup time was 21 (10, 46) months in the ESD group and 54 (30, 85) months in the surgical resection group (Z=-8.985, P=0.000). There was no difference in overall survival rate between the ESD group and the surgical resection group (97.6% vs. 96.5%, logrank χ2=0.772, P=0.380), while the recurrence free survival rate was significantly lower in the ESD group than that in the surgical resection group (94.8% vs. 98.4%, logrank χ2=4667, P=0.031). After propensityscore matching, the overall survival and recurrence free survival rate of the ESD group were comparable to those of the surgical resection group (100% vs. 97.4%, logrank χ2=0.671, P=0.413; 98.6% vs. 97.7%, logrank χ2=0.023, P=0.879). ②Before propensityscore matching, the procedure time ［58 (55, 90) min vs. 270 (210, 315) min, Z=-15.974, P=0.000］ and the length of hospital stay ［11(9, 13) d vs. 18(14, 22) d, Z=-13.428, P=0.000］ were significantly shorter in the ESD group than those in the surgical resection group, and the proportion of ICU transfer was significantly lower in the ESD group ［1.4% (3/213) vs. 18.2% (38/209), χ2=33.835, P=0.000］. After propensityscore matching, the procedure time and the length of hospital stay were still significantly shorter in the ESD group than those in the surgical resection group (all P=0.000).ConclusionsThe longterm outcomes of ESD is comparable to that of surgery in the treatment of EGC. Moreover, ESD is associated with lower ICU transfer rate, shorter procedure time, and shorter hospital stay.

参考文献/References:

[1]Barreto SG,Windsor JA.Redefining early gastric cancer.Surg Endosc,2016,30(1):24-37.
[2]赵中凯,丁士刚.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌的应用进展.中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(12):1107-1111.
[3]Jeon HK,Kim GH,Lee BE,et al.Longterm outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection is comparable to that of surgery for early gastric cancer:a propensitymatched analysis.Gastric Cancer,2018,21(1):133-143.
[4]Ono H,Yao K,Fujishiro M,et al.Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer (second edition).Dig Endosc,2021,33(1):4-20.
[5]Hatta W,Gotoda T,Koike T,et al.History and future perspectives in Japanese guidelines for endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer.Dig Endosc,2020,32(2):180-190.
[6]Lee S,Choi KD,Han M,et al.Longterm outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery in early gastric cancer meeting expanded indication including undifferentiatedtype tumors: a criteriabased analysis.Gastric Cancer,2018,21(3):490-499.
[7]Hahn KY,Park CH,Lee YK,et al.Comparative study between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery in patients with early gastric cancer.Surg Endosc,2018,32(1):73-86.
[8]Lim JH,Kim J,Kim SG,et al.Longterm clinical outcomes of endoscopic vs. surgical resection for early gastric cancer with undifferentiated histology.Surg Endosc,2019,33(11):3589-3599.
[9]Guo A,Du C,Tian S,et al.Longterm outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for treating early gastric cancer of undifferentiatedtype.Medicine (Baltimore),2020,99(22):e20501.
[10]Ahn JY,Kim YI,Shin WG,et al.Comparison between endoscopic submucosal resection and surgery for the curative resection of undifferentiatedtype early gastric cancer within expanded indications:a nationwide multicenter study.Gastric Cancer,2021,24(3):731-743.
[11]Kim SH,Joo MK,Yoo AY,et al.Longterm outcome of the endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer: A comparison between patients with and without liver cirrhosis.Oncol Lett,2022,24(5):404.
[12]Kim TJ,Pyo JH,Lee H,et al.Outcomes of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer in very elderly patients: a nationwide populationbased study.Gut Liver,2022 Dec 29.Epub ahead of print.13Charlson ME,Carrozzino D,Guidi J,et al.Charlson comorbidity index:a critical review of clinimetric properties.Psychother Psychosom,2022,91(1):8-35.
[14]Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma:3rd English edition.Gastric Cancer,2011,14(2):101-112.
[15]日本胃癌学会.胃癌处理规约.东京：金原出版株式会社，2017.36-40.
[16]北京市科委重大项目《早期胃癌治疗规范研究》专家组.早期胃癌内镜下规范化切除的专家共识意见(2018,北京).中华胃肠内镜电子杂志,2018,5(2):49-60.
[17]Liu Q,Ding L,Qiu X,et al.Updated evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for early gastric cancer:a systematic review and metaanalysis.Int J Surg,2020,73:28-41.
[18]Hu J,Zhao Y,Ren M,et al.The comparison between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery in gastric cancer:a systematic review and metaanalysis.Gastroenterol Res Pract,2018,2018:4378945.
[19]Homma S,Tokodai K,Watanabe M,et al.Delayed perforation occurring on the 24th day after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.Clin J Gastroenterol,2017,10(2):124-127.
[20]Miura Y,Tsuji Y,Yoshio T,et al.Association between perioperative management of antiplatelet agents and risk of postendoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding in early gastric cancer: an analysis of a nationwide multicenter study.Gastrointest Endosc,2023,97(5):889-897.
[21]Yumemi T,Yoshii S,Yamakawa T,et al.Red blood cell distribution width as a novel marker for predicting bleeding after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer.DEN Open,2023,3(1):e123.
[22]Paspatis GA,Dumonceau JM,Barthet M,et al.Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations:European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.Endoscopy,2014,46(8):693-711.
[23]Libanio D,PimentelNunes P,DinisRibeiro M.Complications of endoscopic resection techniques for upper GI tract lesions.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol,2016,30(5):735-748.
[24]Oda I,Suzuki H,Nonaka S,et al.Complications of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.Dig Endosc,2013,25 Suppl 1:71-78.
[25]Libanio D,Costa MN,PimentelNunes P,et al.Risk factors for bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection:a systematic review and metaanalysis.Gastrointest Endosc,2016,84(4):572-786.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email：dingshigang222@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-09-07