[1]傅元豪 宫一宸 张鲁锋 吴松 凌云鹏**.应用多支动脉桥经左胸小切口与正中切口行冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床效果比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2023,01(3):208-215.
　Fu Yuanhao,Gong Yichen,Zhang Lufeng,et al.Comparison of Clinical Effects Between Left Chest Small Incision and Median Incision Multiarterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2023,01(3):208-215.
点击复制

应用多支动脉桥经左胸小切口与正中切口行冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床效果比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2023年3期
页码:
208-215
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Clinical Effects Between Left Chest Small Incision and Median Incision Multiarterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
作者:
傅元豪 宫一宸 张鲁锋 吴松 凌云鹏**
(北京大学第三医院心脏外科，北京100191)
Author(s):
Fu Yuanhao;  Gong Yichen;  Zhang Lufeng;  et al.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
关键词:
微创冠状动脉旁路移植术; 主要心脑血管不良事件; 桥血管
Keywords:
Minimally invasive cardiac surgerycoronary artery bypass grafting; Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event; Bypassing vessel
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨应用多支动脉桥进行左胸小切口微创冠状动脉旁路移植术(minimally invasive cardiac surgerycoronary artery bypass grafting，MICS CABG)的早期临床效果。方法回顾性分析2018年1月~2020年12月我科应用多支动脉桥行单纯非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(offpump coronary artery bypass grafting，OPCABG)123例，根据患者需求及术者倾向选择正中切口(正中切口组，n=51)或左胸小切口(左胸小切口组，n=72)入路，在患者出院前利用冠状动脉CT或冠状动脉造影进行桥血管评估，术后随访终点指标为主要心脑血管不良事件(major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event, MACCE)和再次血运重建。结果左胸小切口组远端吻合口(2.7±0.7)个，正中切口组(3.0±0.8)个，差异无显著性(t=-1.885，P=0062)。左胸小切口组全动脉化比例较高［91.7%(66/72) vs. 41.2%(21/51)， χ2=36.762，P=0.000］，围术期输血率较低［31.9%(23/72) vs. 64.7%(33/51)， χ2=12.920，P=0.000］。正中切口组围术期死亡1例。出院前对100例进行桥血管评估，其中左胸小切口组70例，正中切口组30例，复查吻合口共280个，2组桥血管总体通畅率(FitzGibbon A级)差异无显著性［94.2%(179/190) vs. 94.4%(85/90)， χ2=0.006，P=0.937］。118例随访中位时间24个月（6~36个月），2组MACCE发生率［2.9%(2/70) vs. 6.3%(3/48)， χ2=0.808，P=0.369］和再次血运重建率［2.9%(2/70) vs. 2.1%(1/48)， χ2=0.000，P=1.000］差异均无显著性。结论MICS CABG应用多支动脉桥可行，手术策略更倾向于应用全动脉化旁路移植，桥血管通畅率、术后早期随访结果不亚于正中切口手术，且可减少围术期输血。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate early clinical outcomes of minimally invasive cardiac surgerycoronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) using multiarteries via left chest small incision.MethodsClinical data of 123 cases of offpump multiarterial CABG from January 2018 to December 2020 in our department were retrospectively analyzed. According to the needs of the patient and the tendency of the surgeon, the median incision (median incision group, n=51) or left chest small incision (left chest small incision group, n=72) was applied. Coronary CT or coronary angiography were used to evaluate the bypassing vessels before discharge, and early followup was performed after operation. The end point of followup was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) and repeated revascularization.ResultsThere were (2.7±0.7) distal anastomoses in the left chest small incision group and (3.0±0.8) in the median incision group, without significant difference (t=-1.885, P=0.062). The left chest small incision group had a higher ratio of total arterial revascularization ［91.7% (66/72) vs. 41.2% (21/51), χ2=36.762, P=0000］ and less perioperative transfusion ［31.9% (23/72) vs. 64.7% (33/51), χ2=12.920, P=0.000］ than the median incision group. One patient dead in the median incision group due to myocardial infarction. A total of 100 patients underwent coronary CT anteriography before discharge, including 30 in the median incision group and 70 in the left chest small incision group. A total of 280 grafts were reviewed, and there were no significant differences in overall graft patency rate (FitzGibbon grade A) between the two groups ［94.2%(179/190) vs. 94.4%(85/90), χ2=0.006, P=0.937］. A total of 118 patients received followups with a median of 24 months (range, 6-36 months), and the incidences of MACCE ［2.9%(2/70) vs. 6.3%(3/48), χ2=0.808, P=0.369］ and repeated revascularization ［2.9%(2/70) vs. 2.1%(1/48), χ2=0.000, P=1.000］ were not significantly different between the two groups.ConclusionsMICS CABG using multiarteries is a feasible alternative. The surgical strategy is more inclined to perform total arterial bypass grafting. The graft patency rate and early followup results are all not inferior to median incision surgery, with MICS CABG being associated with less transfusion.

参考文献/References:

[1]Thuijs D, Kappetein AP, Serruys PW, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with threevessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10year followup of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial. Lancet,2019,394(10206):1325-1334.
[2]Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronaryartery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med,2009,360(10):961-972.
[3]Brown PP, Kugelmass AD, Cohen DJ, et al. The frequency and cost of complications associated with coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: results from the United States medicare program. Ann Thorac Surg,2008,85(6):1980-1986.
[4]McGinn JT Jr, Usman S, Lapierre H, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: dualcenter experience in 450 consecutive patients. Circulation,2009,120(11 Suppl):S78-S84.
[5]Kikuchi K, Mori M. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann,2017,25(5):364-370.
[6]Nambiar P, Kumar S, Mittal CM, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic arteries: Will this be the future? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2018,155(1):190-197.
[7]Lapierre H, Chan V, Sohmer B, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a small thoracotomy versus offpump: a casematched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2011,40(4):804-810.
[8]Rabindranauth P, Burns JG, Vessey TT, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Innovations (Phila),2014,9(6):421-426.
[9]宫一宸,凌云鹏,吴松,等.小切口全动脉化冠状动脉旁路移植术的早期临床结果.中华医学杂志,2019,99(14):1063-1068.
[10]Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al. Radialartery or saphenousvein grafts in coronaryartery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med,2018,378(22):2069-2077.
[11]Samadashvili Z, Sundt TR, Wechsler A, et al. Multiple versus single arterial coronary bypass graft surgery for multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol,2019,74(10):1275-1285.
[12]Hwang HY, Lee Y, Sohn SH, et al. Equivalent 10year angiographic and longterm clinical outcomes with saphenous vein composite grafts and arterial composite grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2021,162(5):1535-1543.
[13]Fitzgibbon GM, Burton JR, Leach AJ. Coronary bypass graft fate: angiographic grading of 1400 consecutive grafts early after operation and of 1132 after one year. Circulation,1978,57(6):1070-1074.
[14]Barsoum EA, Azab B, Shah N, et al. Longterm mortality in minimally invasive compared with sternotomy coronary artery bypass surgery in the geriatric population (75 years and older patients). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2015,47(5):862-867.
[15]Rocha RV, Tam DY, Karkhanis R, et al. Longterm outcomes associated with total arterial revascularization vs nontotal arterial revascularization. JAMA Cardiol,2020,5(5):507-514.
[16]Neumann FJ, SousaUva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2019,40(2):87-165.
[17]Une D, Lapierre H, Sohmer B, et al. Can minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting be initiated and practiced safely?: a learning curve analysis. Innovations (Phila),2013,8(6):403-409.
[18]Kikuchi K, Chen X, Mori M, et al. Perioperative outcomes of offpump minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic arteries under direct vision. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2017,24(5):696-701.
[19]Davierwala PM, Verevkin A, Sgouropoulou S, et al. Minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery with bilateral internal thoracic arteries: Early outcomes and angiographic patency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2021,162(4):1109-1119.
[20]Nashef SA, Roques F, Sharples LD, et al. EuroSCORE Ⅱ. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2012,41(4):734-745.
[21]宫一宸,崔仲奇,张鲁峰,等.左胸小切口多支动脉化冠状动脉旁路移植术64例的有效性和安全性分析.中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2021,28(2):191-197.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：首都卫生发展科研专项项目（首发2020-2-4096）；北京大学第三医院队列建设项目（BYSYDL2019016）**通讯作者，Email：micsling@pku.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-06-23