[1]于辉 刘俊秀** 许尧珂 邱继宽 王佳悦.鼻腔支架与鼻腔填塞对鼻中隔矫正术后患者麻醉恢复影响的前瞻性随机对照研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2022,01(9):689-694.
　Yu Hui,Liu Junxiu,Xu Yaoke,et al.A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on the Effect of Nasal Stents and Nasal Packing on Anesthesia Recovery After Nasal Septoplasty[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2022,01(9):689-694.
点击复制

鼻腔支架与鼻腔填塞对鼻中隔矫正术后患者麻醉恢复影响的前瞻性随机对照研究()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2022年9期
页码:
689-694
栏目:
临床论著
出版日期:
2023-01-13

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on the Effect of Nasal Stents and Nasal Packing on Anesthesia Recovery After Nasal Septoplasty
作者:
于辉 刘俊秀** 许尧珂 邱继宽 王佳悦
(北京大学第三医院耳鼻咽喉科，北京100191)
Author(s):
Yu Hui;  Liu Junxiu;  Xu Yaoke;  et al.
Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
关键词:
鼻中隔矫正术; 鼻腔支架; 鼻腔填塞
Keywords:
Nasal septoplasty; Nasal stent; Nasal packing
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的比较鼻中隔矫正术后鼻腔支架与膨胀海绵鼻腔填塞对麻醉恢复期的影响。方法选择2021年10月~2022年5月因鼻中隔偏曲行鼻中隔偏曲矫正术59例，随机分为鼻腔支架组(n=29)和膨胀海绵组(n=30)，比较2组患者麻醉恢复期血流动力学、拔管质量、呛咳和屏气等情况。结果鼻腔支架组麻醉恢复期平均动脉压（mean arterial pressure,MAP)和心率（heart rate,HR)均明显低于膨胀海绵组(F=4.284，P=0.043；F=9.673，P=0.003)；MAP拔管后即刻(T1)较麻醉前(T0)下降，在拔管后5 min(T2)、10 min(T3)明显较麻醉前(T0)升高，差异有统计学意义(均P=0.000)；HR拔管后5 min(T2)，拔管后10 min(T3)明显高于拔管后即刻(T1)(P=0.000，P=0.007)，与麻醉前(T0)差异无显著性(P>005)；组别和时间存在交互效应(F=4.977，P=0.004；F=3.028，P=0.037)。鼻腔支架组拔管质量评分明显优于膨胀海绵组(Z=-4.403，P=0.000)；2组患者患者拔管后10 min内血氧饱和度差异无统计学意义(t=1.210，P=0.231)；鼻腔支架组拔管后呛咳、屏气评分优于膨胀海绵组，差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.182，P=0.001)；鼻腔支架组麻醉后监护时间中位数14.0 min，明显短于于膨胀海绵组16.3 min(Z=-2.291，P=0022)。结论鼻腔支架作为鼻中隔矫正术后新型填塞方式较传统鼻腔填塞可以减轻麻醉拔管后应激反应，降低拔管风险。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of nasal stent and nasal packing on anesthesia recovery by comparing the subjective and objective indicators during anesthesia extubation.MethodsA total of 59 patients with deviation of nasal septum between October 2021 and May 2022 were randomly divided into nasal stent group (n=29) and Merocel group (n=30). The hemodynamics, extubation quality, coughing and breath holding in the recovery period of anesthesia between the two groups were compared.ResultsThe mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) in the nasal stent group were significantly lower than those in the Merocel group (F=4.284, P=0.043; F=9673, P=0.003); the MAP decreased immediately after extubation (T1) as compared with that before anesthesia (T0), and increased significantly at 5 min after extubation (T2) and 10 min after extubation (T3) as compared with that before anesthesia (T0) (all P=0000). The HR 5 min after extubation (T2) and 10 min after extubation (T3) were significantly higher than those immediately after extubation (T1) (P=0.000,P=0.007), but had no significant difference as compared with those before anesthesia (T0) (P>0.05). There were interaction effects between group and time (F=4.977, P=0.004; F=3.028, P=0.037). The extubation quality score of the nasal stent group was lower than that of the Merocel group (Z=-4.403, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in blood oxygen saturation within 10 min after extubation between the two groups (t=1.210, P=0.231). The scores of cough and breath hold after extubation in the nasal stent group were significantly lower than those in the Merocel group (Z=-3.182, P=0.001). The median monitoring time after anesthesia in the nasal stent group was 14.0 min, which was significantly shorter than that in the Merocel group (16.3 min), with statistically significant difference (Z=-2.291, P=0.022).ConclusionCompared with traditional nasal packing, nasal stents can reduce the stress response after anesthesia extubation and the risk of extubation.

参考文献/References:

[1]Sainio S, Blomgren K, Lundberg M. Complications and number of followup visits after using septal stapler in septoplasty. Rhinology,2019,57(4):273-278.
[2]房胜建,王卫华.鼻中隔矫正术后鼻腔处理的研究进展.中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志,2019,19(3):217-219.
[3]Ardehali MM, Bastaninejad S. Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2009,38(10):1022-1024.
[4]汤翠翠,崔香,马玲,等.不同剂量右美托咪定对鼻窦手术患者应激反应和苏醒质量的影响.广东医学,2017,38(2):296-299.
[5]李华,周香莲,杨鹍华.不同剂量右美托咪定复合丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼持续静脉泵注对功能性鼻镜鼻窦手术患者围术期应激反应及苏醒质量的影响.临床医学,2018,38(6):24-27.
[6]Simsek T, Coskun Musaoglu I, Uluat A. The effect of lidocaine and tramadol in nasal packs on pain after septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol,2019,276(6):1663-1669.
[7]于辉,刘俊秀,许尧珂.鼻中隔矫正术后鼻腔微创支架与膨胀海绵填塞的临床对照研究.中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2022,28(4):63-67.
[8]Ibrahim M, Elnabtity AM, Keera A. Efficacy of external nasal nerve block following nasal surgery: A randomized, controlled trial. Anaesthesist,2018,67(3):188-197.
[9]Burduk PK, Wierzchowska M, Grzeskowiak B, et al. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction using biodegradable(NasoPore)and nonbiodegradable packing, a doubleblind, prospective, randomized study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol,2017,83(1):23-28.
[10]Günaydn R, Aygenc E, Karakullukcu S, et al. Nasal packing and transseptal suturing techniques: surgical and anaesthetic perspectives. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol,2011,268(8):1151-1156.
[11]Turhan M, Bostanc A, Akdag M, et al. A comparison of the effects of packing or transseptal suture on polysomnographic parameters in septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol,2013,270(4):1339-1344.
[12]何国尊,叶青,马欢,等.右美托咪定联合帕瑞昔布钠对鼻内镜手术苏醒期躁动及术后早期镇痛的影响.中国内镜杂志,2022,28(3):8-15.
[13]Bista M. Effects of bilateral nasal packing on oxygen saturation and blood pressure. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc,2017,56(208):442-446.
[14]Armengot M, Hernández R, Miguel P, et al. Effect of total nasal obstruction on nocturnal oxygen saturation. Am J Rhinol,2008,22(3):325-328.
[15]Cayonu M, Acar A, Horasanl E, et al. Comparison of totally occlusive nasal pack, internal nasal splint, and transseptal suture technique after septoplasty in terms of immediate respiratory distress related to anesthesia and surgical complications. Acta Otolaryngol,2014,134(4):390-394.
[16]Muluk NB, Apan A, Ozakir S, et al. Risk of respiratory distress in the patients who were applied nasal packing at the end of nasal surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx,2008,35(4):521-526.
[17]柏昊.无抽搐电休克治疗导致麻醉后监护时间延长的危险因素分析.临床精神医学杂志,2022,32(1):63-65.
[18]Karata D, Yüksel F, Doan M, et al. Another advantage of the transseptal suture: shortens the duration of waking up after anesthesia. J Craniofac Surg,2014,25(2):602-603.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：首都卫生发展科研专项（2020-2Z-40918）**通讯作者，Email:liujunxiusanyuan@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-01-13