[1]张鲁锋* 傅元豪 孟鲁豫 凌云鹏 冯海波.冠状动脉旁路移植术中胸腔镜与小切口直视获取胸廓内动脉的对比研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2022,01(11):859-863.
　Zhang Lufeng,Fu Yuanhao,Meng Luyu,et al.Comparison of Thoracoscopic and Minimally Invasive Direct Left Internal Thoracic Artery Harvesting in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2022,01(11):859-863.
点击复制

冠状动脉旁路移植术中胸腔镜与小切口直视获取胸廓内动脉的对比研究()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2022年11期
页码:
859-863
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-02-23

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Thoracoscopic and Minimally Invasive Direct Left Internal Thoracic Artery Harvesting in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
作者:
张鲁锋* 傅元豪 孟鲁豫 凌云鹏 冯海波
(北京大学第三医院心脏外科，北京100191)
Author(s):
Zhang Lufeng;  Fu Yuanhao;  Meng Luyu;  et al.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
关键词:
冠状动脉旁路移植术; 胸腔镜技术; 微创外科; 左侧胸廓内动脉
Keywords:
Coronary artery bypass graft; Thoracoscopic technique; Minimally invasive surgery; Left internal thoracic artery
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的对比胸腔镜和小切口直视获取左侧胸廓内动脉进行微创冠状动脉旁路移植手术的效果。方法回顾性研究2020年1月~2022年6月完成的胸腔镜辅助微创冠状动脉旁路移植术18例和小切口直视冠状动脉旁路移植术20例。2组年龄、左室射血分数、左室舒张末内径差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腔镜组使用胸腔镜器械获取左侧胸廓内动脉，应用微创心脏稳定器在左前外侧胸部小切口、非体外循环下完成冠状动脉旁路移植手术，包括左侧胸廓内动脉与冠状动脉前降支单支旁路移植16例，多支冠状动脉旁路移植2例。小切口组20例行左前外侧胸部小切口直视获取左侧胸廓内动脉，与前降支行旁路移植手术。结果腔镜组18例中16例成功获取左侧胸廓内动脉，1例转为肋间小切口直视获取左侧胸廓内动脉，1例胸腔镜获取血管时损伤远端，经肋间小切口直视修补后完成血管吻合。小切口组20例均成功获取胸廓内动脉并行旁路移植手术。与小切口组相比，腔镜组术后呼吸机使用时间短［(4.9±2.0)h vs. (6.5±2.3)h，t=-2.318，P=0026］，术后住院时间短［(4.5±0.9)d vs.(5.3±0.8)d，t=-2.859，P=0.007］。2组监护室停留时间、输血例数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)，出院前冠状动脉造影或CTA检查显示2组桥血管通畅率均为100%。结论胸腔镜获取左侧胸廓内动脉进行微创冠状动脉旁路移植术的效果与小切口直视技术相似，在缩短术后呼吸机使用时间以及住院时间方面具有优势。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical data of patients who underwent thoracoscopic or minimally invasive left internal thoracic artery (LITA) harvesting technique for coronary artery bypass grafting.MethodsFrom January 2020 to June 2022, 38 patients underwent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgeries. LITA was harvested with thoracoscopic (n=18) or minimally invasive instruments (n=20), respectively. There were no significant differences in age, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular end diastolic dimension between the two groups (P>0.05). In the thoracoscopic group, LITA was obtained with the thoracoscopic instrument, and the coronary artery bypass grafting was completed with the minimally invasive heart stabilizer through a small incision in the left anterolateral chest without cardiopulmonary bypass, including 16 cases of single bypass grafting between LITA and the anterior descending artery, and 2 cases of multi coronary artery bypass grafting. In the minimally invasive group, 20 patients underwent bypass grafting with the anterior descending artery after obtaining LITA through a small anterolateral chest incision under direct vision.ResultsAmong the 18 cases in the thoracoscopic group, LITA was successfully obtained in 16 cases, conversion to a small intercostal incision to obtain LITA under direct vision was required in 1 case, and the distal end was injured when obtaining the blood vessels under the thoracoscope in 1 case, with vascular anastomosis completed after repair through a small intercostal incision under direct vision. In the minimally invasive group, 20 patients were successfully obtained LITA and underwent bypass grafting. Compared with the minimally invasive group, patients in the thoracoscopic group showed advantages in postoperative mechanical ventilation time (4.9±2.0 h vs. 65±2.3 h, t=-2.318, P=0.026) and postoperative hospital length of stay (4.5±0.9 d vs. 5.3±0.8 d, t=-2.859, P=0007). There were no differences in perioperative red blood cell transfusion and ICU length of stay (P>0.05). Postoperative coronary angiography or CTA showed 100% graft patency.ConclusionThoracoscopic LITA harvesting shows comparable clinical result with minimally invasive technique and advantages in mechanical ventilation time and postoperative length of stay.

参考文献/References:

[1]张鲁锋，凌云鹏，杨航，等.新型胸壁牵开系统与改良心脏稳定器在左胸小切口冠状动脉旁路移植手术中的应用.中国微创外科杂志，2016，16(3)：193-196.
[2]张鲁锋，凌云鹏，宫一宸，等.合并胸腔粘连患者行左前外侧胸部小切口冠状动脉旁路移植术的安全性.中国微创外科杂志，2020，20(1)：55-57.
[3]Fitzgibbon GM,Kafka HP,Leach AJ,et al.Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic followup of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years.J Am Coll Cardiol,1996,28(3):616-626.
[4]Ono M，Serruys PW，Hara H,et al.10year followup after revascularization in elderly patients with complex coronary artery disease.J Am Coll Cardiol,2021,77(22):2761-2773.
[5]Zhang L,Fu Y,Gong Y,et al.Graft patency and completeness of revascularization in minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass surgery.J Card Surg,2021,36:992-997.
[6]Snegirev MA,Paivin AA,Denisyuk DO,et al.Minimally invasive multivessel coronary bypass surgery:angiographic patency data.J Card Surg,2020,35:620-625.
[7]Cain MT,Joyce DL,Szabo A,et al.Reduced morbidity and mortality associated with minimallyinvasive single vessel coronary artery bypass compared with conventional sternotomy.Ann Surg,2022 Jul 7.Epub ahead of print.
[8]郑哲，胡盛寿，周玉燕.电视胸腔镜辅助下微创冠状动脉旁路移植术临床及随访结果.中华胸心血管外科杂志，2006，22(1)：52-53.
[9]Tachibana K,Kikuchi K,Narayama K,et al.Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic artery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech,2022,14:107-113.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email：zhanglufeng@bjmu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-02-23