[1]吴煜 邹士琦 王霄*.口腔种植机器人在口腔种植手术中的初步应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2021,01(9):787-791.
 Wu Yu,Zou Shiqi,Wang Xiao,et al.Preliminary Application of Dental Implant Robot in Dental Implant Operations[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2021,01(9):787-791.
点击复制

口腔种植机器人在口腔种植手术中的初步应用()
分享到:

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2021年9期
页码:
787-791
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Preliminary Application of Dental Implant Robot in Dental Implant Operations
作者:
吴煜 邹士琦 王霄*
(北京大学第三医院口腔科,北京100191)
Author(s):
Wu Yu Zou Shiqi Wang Xiao et al.
Department of Stomatology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
关键词:
口腔种植手术机器人牙列缺损
Keywords:
Dental implant operationRobotTooth missing
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨口腔种植机器人在口腔种植手术中应用的有效性和安全性。 方法2020年9~10月对我科66例牙列缺损(81颗牙齿缺失)拟行种植手术者术前均行口腔锥形束CT(cone beam CT,CBCT)检查,将其影像数据输入种植机器人导航定位系统进行三维重建并行术前种植体三维位置规划。局麻消毒后行患者及机械臂的注册,导航下全程机械臂完成种植窝洞的制备和种植体植入,术后CBCT检查验证种植体误差。结果口腔种植机器人术前准备时间(描述手术注册到机械臂开始实施窝洞制备的时间)3~23 min,平均8 min。所有种植手术均顺利完成,术中未发生并发症。种植体植入点总误差为(0.63±0.23) mm, 根尖点总误差为(0.64±0.26) mm,角度误差为2.27°±0.98°。结论口腔种植机器人进行口腔种植手术定位精度高,可根据缺牙区牙槽骨的形态进行术前手术规划,避免周围重要神经及解剖结构的损伤,临床效果满意。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of dental implant robot Remedent for dental implant operation.MethodsA total of 66 patients with 81 teeth missing were admitted to our department for dental implant operation from September 2020 to October 2020. All the patients underwent cone beam CT (CBCT) scan before surgery. The CBCT DICOM data were uploaded into the robotic planning software for 3D reconstruction, and virtual preoperative threedimensional implant position planning was carried out. After local anesthesia and disinfection, the patient and the robotic arm were registered, and the implant fossa and cavity were prepared and implanted with the robotic arm under navigation. Postoperative CBCT was taken to evaluate the deviations between the virtual and the actually placed implants.ResultsThe preoperative preparation time of the dental implant robot Remedent (describing the time of the operation registration to the robotic arm for the preparation of the cavity) was 3-23 min, with an average of 8 min. All the implant operations were successfully completed without complications. The total error of the implant point was (0.63±0.23) mm, the total error of the apical point was (0.64±0.26) mm, and the angle error was 2.27°±0.98°.ConclusionsThe dental implant robot Remedent has high positional accuracy. Preoperative surgical planning can be carried out according to the shape of alveolar bone in the missing area, so as to avoid the injury of important peripheral nerves and anatomical structures, and achieve satisfactory clinical effect.

参考文献/References:

[1]Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant,2004,19(Suppl):S43-S61.
[2]Monaco C, Arena A, Corsaletti L. 2D/3D accuracies of implant position after guided surgery using different surgical protocols: a retrospective study. J Prosthodont Res,2019,64(4):424-430.
[3]陈琳,魏凌飞,陈泉林,等.计算机辅助动态导航技术在口腔种植手术中的应用.实用口腔医学杂志,2020,36(3):477-481.
[4]满毅,周楠,杨醒眉.动态实时导航在口腔种植领域中的临床应用及新进展.口腔疾病防治,2020,28(6):341-348.
[5]刘艾芄,赵娅琴,王晓华,等.实时导航与传统种植牙技术的精确度研究.中国临床新医学,2020,12(4):345-348.
[6]Sun TM, Lee HE, Lan TH. The influence of dental experience on a dental implant navigation system. BMC Oral Health,2019,19(1):1-11.
[7]JorbaGarcía A, Figueiredo R, GonzálezBarnadas A, et al. Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: An invitro study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal,2019,24(1):e76-e83.
[8]Kaewsiri D, Panmekiate S, Subbalekha K, et al. The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computerassisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res,2019,30(6):505-514.
[9]Block MS, Emery RW, Cullum DR, et al. Implant placement is more accurate using dynamic navigation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2017,75(7):1377-1386.
[10]Tencati E, Moy P. Accuracy of dynamic computeraided navigation system for dental implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2019,77(9):e68-e69.
[11]Cheng KJ, Kan TS, Liu YF, et al. Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An invitro study. Comput Biol Med,2021,129:104153.
[12]Mozer P. Accuracy and deviation analysis of static and robotic guided implant surgery: A case study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2020,35(5):e86-e90.
[13]SomogyiGanss E, Holmes HI, Jokstad A. Accuracy of a novel prototype dynamic computerassisted surgery system. Clin Oral Implants Res,2015,26(8):882-890.
[14]Worthington P.Injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: a formula for protection of the patient and clinician. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant,2004,19(5):731-734.
[15]Block MS, Emery RW. Static or dynamic navigation for implant placementchoosing the method of guidance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2016,74(2):269-277.
[16]Block MS,Emery RW, Lank K,et al. Implant placement accuracy using dynamic navigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant,2017,32(1):92-99.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者,Email:bysywangxiao@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-12-09