[1]张永强 潘伟 姚兰*.气管内表面麻醉联合全身麻醉在老年患者气管超声内镜引导针吸活检术中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,01(9):834-837.
　Zhang Yongqiang,Pan Wei,Yao Lan..Application of Intratracheal Topical Anesthesia Combined With General Anesthesia in Elderly Patients During the Procedure of Endobroncheal Ultrasoundguided Transbroncheal Needle Aspiration[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2020,01(9):834-837.
点击复制

气管内表面麻醉联合全身麻醉在老年患者气管超声内镜引导针吸活检术中的应用()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2020年9期
页码:
834-837
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of Intratracheal Topical Anesthesia Combined With General Anesthesia in Elderly Patients During the Procedure of Endobroncheal Ultrasoundguided Transbroncheal Needle Aspiration
作者:
张永强 潘伟 姚兰*
（北京大学国际医院麻醉科，北京102206）
Author(s):
Zhang Yongqiang;  Pan Wei;  Yao Lan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University International Hospital, Peking 102206, China
关键词:
气管内表面麻醉; 环甲膜穿刺; 全身麻醉; 气管超声内镜引导针吸活检术; 老年患者
Keywords:
Intratracheal topical anesthesia; Thyrocricocentesis; General anesthesia; Endobroncheal ultrasoundguided transbronchial needle aspiration; Elderly patients
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨气管内表面麻醉联合全身麻醉用于老年患者气管超声内镜引导针吸活检术（endobroncheal ultrasoundguided transbroncheal needle aspiration，EBUSTBNA）的可行性和安全性。方法回顾性分析我院行EBUSTBNA的老年患者（年龄65～85岁）63例，麻醉医生根据麻醉习惯选择麻醉方法，单纯全身麻醉31例（A组），气管内表面麻醉联合全身麻醉32例（B组）。比较EBUSTBNA操作开始至苏醒拔除喉罩期间心血管不良事件（高血压、低血压、心律失常）发生的次数、呛咳/体动次数、苏醒时间（停止麻醉药物泵入至拔除喉罩时间）、瑞芬太尼用量和操作时间。 结果B组患者心血管不良事件发生次数中位数2（0～3）次，明显少于A组6（3～12）次（Z=-6.758，P=0.000）；B组患者呛咳/体动次数中位数0（0～1）次，明显少于A组2（0～4）次（Z=-4.943，P=0.000）；B组患者瑞芬太尼用量（427.2±46.2）μg,明显少于A组（535.2±73.6） μg(t=6.996，P=0.000)；B组患者苏醒时间（8.6±1.6）min，明显短于A组(12.4±1.9)min（t=8.855，P=0000）。2组操作时间差异无显著性（32.7±3.9）min vs.（32.3±4.1）min（t=-0.362，P=0.719）。结论气管内表面麻醉联合全身麻醉用于老年患者EBUSTBNA安全可行，与单纯全身麻醉相比术中循环系统更加稳定，苏醒更加迅速。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo observe the feasibility and safety for endobroncheal ultrasoundguided transbroncheal needle aspiration (EBUSTBNA) under intratracheal topical anesthesia combined with general anesthesia in elderly patients.MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on 63 elderly patients (65-85 years old) scheduled for EBUSTBNA. They were divided into two groups according to the habit of the anesthesiologist to choose the mode of anesthesia, the group A (only received general anesthesia,n=31) and the group B (received intratracheal topical anesthesia combined with general anesthesia, n=32). All the patients had been recorded numbers of adverse cardiovascular events (hypertension, hypotension, arrhythmia) and cough/body motion, time of awake (the time from stopping the infusion of anesthetic drugs to the removal of laryngeal mask), remifentanil dosage, and operating time.ResultsThe median number of adverse cardiovascular events in the group B was significantly lower than that in the group A ［2 (0-3) times vs. 6 (3-12) times, Z=-6.758, P=0.000］. The number of cough/body motion in the group B was significantly lower than that in the group A ［0 (0-1) times vs. 2 (0-4) times, Z=-4.943, P=0.000］. The remifentanil dosage in the group B was significantly less than that in the group A ［(427.2±46.2) μg vs.(535.2±73.6) μg, t=6996, P=0.000］. The mean time of awake in the group B was significantly shorter than that in the group A ［(8.6±1.6) min vs. (12.4±1.9) min, t=8.855, P=0.000］. The operating time between the two groups was not statistically significant ［(32.7±3.9) min vs. (32.3±41) min, t=-0.362, P=0719］.ConclusionsThe application of intratracheal topical anesthesia combined with general anesthesia during the procedure of EBUSTBNA is safe and feasible in elderly patients. Compared with only general anesthesia, this combination anesthesia method has advantages of more stable hemodynamics and shorter time of awake.

参考文献/References:

[1]王若天,支修益,张毅,等.超声支气管镜引导针吸活检在纵隔及肺门淋巴结肿大中的临床应用.中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(1):4-6.
[2]熊伟,陈萍,田雷,等.全凭静脉麻醉下Igel 喉罩在支气管内超声引导针刺吸活检术中的应用.中国内镜杂志,2017,23(12):1-4.
[3]Eger EL Ⅱ, Saidman LJ, Brandstater B. Minimum alveolar anesthetic concentrateon: A standard of anesthetic potency. Anesthesiology,1965,26(6):756-763.
[4]廖志辉，何农，余永华，等.丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼在不同伤害性刺激下的响应面积分析.临床麻醉学杂志,2016,32(4):354-357.
[5]Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K. Reduction by fentanyl of the Cp50 values of propofol and hemodynamic responses to various noxlous stimuli. Anesthesiology,1997,87(2):213-227.
[6]李朋仙，赵艳，郭向阳.靶控输注舒芬太尼复合全麻对围术期应激反应的影响.中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(5):388-393.
[7]邓小明,曾因明,主译.米勒麻醉学.第7版.北京：北京大学医学出版社,2011.806-807.
[8]许川雅,张梁,李民通.靶控输注瑞芬太尼联合七氟烷用于腰椎手术控制性降压的前瞻性随机对照研究.中国微创外科杂志,2011,11(12):1103-1107.
[9]Sebel PS, Hoke JF, Westmoreland C, et al. Histamine concentrations and hemodynamic responses after remifentanil. Anesth Analg,1995,80(5):990-993.
[10]何艳,丁玲玲,米卫东.健忘镇痛慢诱导用于老年患者麻醉诱导期的安全性分析.海军医学杂志,2015,36(3):250-252.
[11]张艺泷，米卫东.舒芬太尼或芬太尼复合咪唑安定在慢诱导麻醉中对呼吸功能的影响.解放军医学杂志,2007,32(2):150-152.
[12]张书力,李进,王加芳,等.不同局麻药气道表面麻醉抑制插管及拔管反应的效果比较.中华临床医师杂志,2012,16(6):4851-4853.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email:1507yaolan@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-09