[1]冯方* 彭毅 张晗 刘英①.骨填充网袋椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体爆裂骨折的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,01(5):441-450.
　Feng Fang,Peng Yi,Zhang Han,et al.Comparison of Vesselplasty and Percutaneous Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Burst Fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2020,01(5):441-450.
点击复制

骨填充网袋椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体爆裂骨折的比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2020年5期
页码:
441-450
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Vesselplasty and Percutaneous Kyphoplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Burst Fractures
作者:
冯方* 彭毅 张晗 刘英①
(南充市中心医院康复科，南充637000)
Author(s):
Feng Fang;  Peng Yi;  Zhang Han;  et al.
Department of Rehabilitation, Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong 637000, China
关键词:
骨填充网袋椎体成形术; 经皮椎体后凸成形术; 骨质疏松; 椎体爆裂骨折; 骨水泥渗漏
Keywords:
Vesselplasty; Percutaneous kyphoplasty; Osteoporosis; Vertebral burst fracture; Bone cement leakage
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨骨填充网袋椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术(percutaneous kyphoplasty，PKP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体爆裂骨折(osteoporotic vertebral burst fracture，OVBF)的疗效差异。方法回顾性分析我科2015年1月~2017年12月58例OVBF，骨填充网袋椎体成形术组22例，PKP组36例。比较2组手术时间、骨水泥灌注量、骨水泥渗漏率、疼痛视觉模拟评分(Visual Analogue Score，VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry Disability Index，ODI)、伤椎前缘高度、伤椎后凸Cobb角。结果骨填充网袋椎体成形术组手术时间和骨水泥注入量与PKP组比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。骨填充网袋椎体成形术组骨水泥渗漏2例(9.1%)，明显少于PKP组骨水泥渗漏14例(38.9%)（χ2=4.670,P=0.031），均无神经脊髓症。58例术后随访12~36个月，平均24.4月。2组间VAS评分、ODI比较差异无显著性（P>0.05），组间和时间无交互作用（P>0.05）。2组患者术后1 d、末次随访VAS评分、ODI均明显小于术前(P均=0.000)，且末次随访时较术后1 d进一步降低(P均=0000)。2组间伤椎前缘高度、伤椎后凸Cobb角差异无显著性（P>0.05）,组间和时间无交互作用（P>0.05）。2组患者术后1 d、末次随访时伤椎前缘高度显著高于术前(P均=0.000)，末次随访时较术后1 d无明显丢失(P=0.144)。2组患者术后1 d及末次随访时伤椎后凸Cobb角明显小于术前(P均=0.000)，末次随访时较术后1 d无明显变化(P=0.288)。骨填充网袋椎体成形术组1例手术椎体再骨折，2例非手术椎体骨折，PKP组4例非手术椎骨折，2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>005)。结论骨填充网袋椎体成形术和PKP治疗OVBF均可缓解患者的临床症状，部分恢复伤椎高度，矫正伤体后凸畸形，但骨填充网袋椎体成形术能有效降低骨水泥渗漏。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of vesselplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral burst fracture (OVBF).MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on 58 patients with OVBF from January 2015 to December 2017. According to the treatment method, they were divided into two groups: vesselplasty group (n=22) and PKP group (n=36). The operation time, bone cement perfusion and bone cement leakage rate were compared between the two groups. The Visual Analog Score (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the anterior edge height of injured vertebrae, and the Cobb angle of kyphosis of injured vertebrae were recorded 1 day after operation and at the last followup.ResultsThere were no significant differences in operation time and bone cement injection between the vesselplasty group and PKP group (P>0.05). In the vesselplasty group, there were 2 cases of bone cement leakage (91%), while in the PKP group, 14 cases (38.9%), all of which had no neuromyelopathy. The leakage rate of bone cement in the vesselplasty group was lower than that in the PKP group (χ2=4.670, P=0031). The patients were followed up for 12-36 months with an average of 24.4 months. There was no significant difference in VAS scores and ODI between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no interaction between the groups and time (P>0.05). The VAS scores and ODI of the two groups were significantly lower 1 day after operation and at the last followup than those before operation (all P=0.000), and the VAS scores and ODI at the last followup were further lower than those 1 day after operation (all P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the anterior edge height and the Cobb angle between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no interaction between the groups and time (P>0.05). The anterior edge height of injured vertebrae in the two groups was significantly higher 1 day after operation and at the last followup than those before operation (all P=0.000), and there was no significant loss at the last followup (P=0.144). The Cobb angle of injured kyphosis in the two groups at 1 day after operation and at the last followup was significantly lower than those before operation (all P=0.000), but there was no significant change at the last followup as compared with that at 1 day after operation(P=0.288). During the followup period, there were 1 case of refracture of vertebrae and 2 cases of nonoperative fracture of vertebrae in the vesselplasty group, and 4 cases of nonoperative fracture of vertebrae in the PKP group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsBoth vesselplasty and PKP can relieve the clinical symptoms of the patients, partially restore the height of the injured vertebrae, and correct the kyphosis of the injured body in the treatment of OVBF. However, bone pouch vesselplasty can effectively reduce bone cement leakage.

参考文献/References:

[1]孙育良,熊小明,何本祥,等.椎体成形骨填充材料的研究与现状.中国组织工程研究,2017,21(14):2285-2290.
[2]王涛,马信龙,张晓林.椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性压缩骨折的研究进展.中华创伤杂志,2016,32 (7):661-665.
[3]Pingel A, Kandziora F, Hoffmann CH. Osteoporotic L1 burst fracture treated by shortsegment percutaneous stabilization with cementaugmented screws and kyphoplasty (hybrid technique).Eur Spine J,2014,23 (9):2022-2023.
[4]Nakano M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, et al.Transpedicular vertebroplasty after intravertebral cavity formation versus conservative treatment for osteoporotic burst fractures. Spine J,2014,14(1):39-48.
[5]Oh T, Scheer JK, Fakurnejad S, et al. Minimally invasive spinal surgery for the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Clin Neurosci,2015,22(1):42-47.
[6]孙育良,熊小明,邓轩赓,等.两次与单次骨水泥灌注治疗骨质疏松性椎体爆裂骨折的比较.中国矫形外科杂志,2018,26(6):481-486.MRI定位骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折责任椎体的价值.中华创伤杂志,2016,32(9):789-793.
[7]林端阳,王孝林,谭涛,等.网袋加压成形与后凸成形治疗后壁破损型骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的近期疗效对比.中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(5):430-434.
[8]王孝林,权正学,王南,等.网袋加压椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折.中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(9):822-826.
[9]王智黔, 赵安菊, 彭智,等.骨填充网袋椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较.中华创伤杂志,2018,34(7):618-623.
[10]曹臣,陈书连,高延征,等.骨填充网袋单侧穿刺经皮椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较.中华创伤杂志,2019,35(1):30-37.
[11]Golob AL, Laya MB.Osteoporosis: screening, prevention, and management.Med Clin North Am,2015,99(3):587-606.
[12]康茬，唐可，肖艳，等.核素骨显像和MRI定位骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折责任椎体的价值.中华创伤杂志,2016,32(9):789-793.
[13]姚珍松,陈康,江晓兵,等.网袋成形术治疗骨壁破裂型复杂椎体骨折的经验.中国矫形外科杂志,2016,24(16):1466-1470.
[14]马田成,王林,李天清,等.旋转棒技术结合短节段固定治疗亚急性期胸腰段椎体压缩骨折.中华创伤骨科杂志,2015,17(6):509-512.
[15]Eck JC, Nachtigall D, Humphreys SC, et al.Comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a metaanalysis of the literature.Spine J,2008,8(3):488-497.
[16]张帅,王清,杨进,等.经皮椎体后凸成形术骨水泥椎管内渗漏发生率及相关危险因素分析.中国矫形外科杂志,2018,26(24):2244-2249.
[17]黄浩然, 冯丽, 梁华,等.骨填充网袋治疗老年性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的特点.中国组织工程研究,2018,22(26):4110-4115.
[18]He CJ, Liu GD.Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bonefilling mesh container and simple percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Pain Physician,2018,21(3):259-268.
[19]侯伟,熊小明,万趸,等.球囊与扩张矫形器辅助的椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较.中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(18):1633-1636.
[20]Zeng TH, Wang YM, Yang XJ, et al.The clinical comparative study on high and low viscosity bone cement application in vertebroplasty.Int J Clin Exp Med,2015,8(10):18855-18860.
[21]邓轩赓,熊小明,石华刚,等.骨质疏松性胸腰椎爆裂骨折PKP术中用明胶海绵减少骨水泥渗漏的对照研究.中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(5):497-499.
[22]刘意强,王成日,韦国平,等.远程遥控骨水泥推注系统辅助经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗后壁破裂型骨质疏松性椎体骨折.中国修复重建外科杂志,2017,31(5):527-533.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email：83468762@qq.com ①（西南石油大学校医院，南充637000）
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-08-08