[1]刘涛 牛国旗** 周功 陈辉 聂虎.经皮弯角椎体成形与经皮椎体成形治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,01(5):436-440.
　Liu Tao,Niu Guoqi,Zhou Gong,et al.Comparison Between Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty and Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compressive Fractures[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2020,01(5):436-440.
点击复制

经皮弯角椎体成形与经皮椎体成形治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2020年5期
页码:
436-440
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison Between Percutaneous Curved Vertebroplasty and Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compressive Fractures
作者:
刘涛 牛国旗** 周功 陈辉 聂虎
（蚌埠医学院第二附属医院骨科，蚌埠233040）
Author(s):
Liu Tao;  Niu Guoqi;  Zhou Gong;  et al.
Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233040,China
关键词:
骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折; 经皮弯角椎体成形术; 经皮椎体成形术
Keywords:
Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture; Percutaneous curved vertebroplasty; Percutaneous vertebroplasty
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的比较经皮弯角椎体成形术（percutaneous curved vertebroplasty，PCVP）与经皮椎体成形术（percutaneous vertebroplasty，PVP）治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(osteoporotic vertebral compressive fractures，OVCF)的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2018年3月～2019年3月60例OVCF手术治疗的临床资料，其中PCVP 30例，PVP 30例，比较2组手术时间、术中透视次数、骨水泥注入量、术后住院时间、术前后疼痛视觉模拟评分（Visual Analogue Score，VAS），以及骨水泥在骨折椎体内的分布情况、渗漏率。结果PCVP组手术时间和术中透视次数均明显短于或少于PVP组［(29.4±21)min vs.(36.8±2.2)min, t＝-13.333，P＝0.000；(10.2±1.4) 次vs.(15.1±1.5)次，t＝-13.394，P＝0.000］。PCVP组骨水泥分布优良率1000％（30/30），明显高于PVP组533％（16/30）（Fisher精确检验，P＝0.000）；PCVP组骨水泥渗漏率6.7％（2/30），明显低于PVP组46.7％（14/30）（χ2＝12273，P＝0.000）。PCVP组与PVP组骨水泥注入量和术后住院时间差异均无显著性 ［(3.6±0.3)ml vs. (3.7±0.3)ml，t＝-1.811，P＝0.075；(1.8±0.8)d vs.(2.1±1.0)d，t＝-1.105，P＝0.274］。2组VAS评分差异无显著性（F=0.313,P=0.578），不同时间点差异有显著性（F=472703，P=0000），分组和时间无交互作用（F=0.422，P=0.658）。2组均完成3~6个月随访，未出现脊髓神经损伤、伤椎再骨折及邻近椎体骨折等并发症。结论PCVP和PVP均可以明显改善OVCF患者的疼痛症状，但PCVP具有手术时间短、术中透视次数少、骨水泥分布好、骨水泥渗漏率低等优点。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effect of percutaneous curved vertebroplasty (PCVP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compressive fractures (OVCF).MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on 60 elderly patients diagnosed as OVCF and treated with surgery in our hospital form March 2018 to March 2019. The patients were divided into PCVP group or PVP group, including 30 cases in PCVP group and 30 cases in PVP group. The operation time, number of Xray exposure, bone cement injection volume, postoperative hospitalization time, Visual Analogue Score (VAS), bone cement distribution, and bone cement leakage were compared between the two groups.ResultsCompared with the PVP group, the operation time of the PCVP group was significantly shorter［(29.4±2.0) min vs. (36.8±2.2) min, t=-13.333, P=0.000］, the number of Xray exposure was less［10.2±1.4) times vs. (15.1±1.5) times, t=-13.394, P=0.000］, the excellent and good rate of bone cement distribution was higher［100.0% (30/30) vs. 53.3% (16/30), Fisher’s exact test, P=0.000］, and the leakage rate of bone cement was lower［6.7% (2/30) vs. 46.7% (14/30), χ2=12.273, P=0.000］. There was no significant difference in bone cement injection and postoperative hospitalization time between the PCVP group and the PVP group ［(3.6±0.3) ml vs. (3.7±0.3) ml, t=-1.811, P=0.075; (1.8±0.8) d vs. (2.1±1.0) d, t=-1.105, P=0.274］. There was no significant difference in VAS score (F=0.313, P=0.578) between the two groups. The difference was statistically significant at different time points (F=472.703, P=0.000), and there were no interactions between groups and time (F=0.422, P=0.658). There were no complications such as spinal cord nerve injury, refracture of injured vertebrae and fracture of adjacent vertebral body in the two groups during the followup of 36 months.ConclusionsBoth PCVP and PVP can significantly relieve the pain of patients with OVCF. However, PCVP has the advantages of short operation time, less Xray exposure, less trauma, good distribution of bone cement and low leakage rate of bone cement.

参考文献/References:

[1]祝腾蛟，田耘，周方.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折微创治疗的现状和进展.中国微创外科杂志,2015,15（12）：1121-1124.
[2]李玉伟，崔红领，王海蛟，等.应用可弯曲骨水泥注入器单侧穿刺行经皮椎体成形术的可行性及疗效.中华放射学杂志，2017,51（4）:293-298.
[3]熊森，毛克亚，韩振川，等.弯角输送装置在体位椎体成形实验中的效果观察.解放军医学院学报,2016,37（7）:769-772,778.
[4]周权发，刘宏建，寇红伟，等.弯角椎体成形装置的早期疗效评估及对骨水泥分布的影响.中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25（10）:892-897.
[5]黎双庆，杨波，杨逸禧，等.经皮穿刺椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性严重椎体压缩性骨折.中国微创外科杂志，2015,15（9）：818-821.
[6]Kim JH, Yoo SH, Kim JH. Longterm followup of percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fracture: minimum of 5 years followup. Asian Spine J,2012,6(1):6-14.
[7]Furtado N, Oakland RJ, Wilcox RK, et al. A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2007,32(17):480-487.
[8]Yang EZ, Xu JG, Huang GZ, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in aged patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. Spine,2016,41(8):653-660.
[9]Kaufmann TJ, Trout AT, Kallmes DF. The effects of cement volume on clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2006,27(9):1933-1937.
[10]Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, et al. An exvivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bonetamp used in the treatment of compression fracture. Spine,2001,26(14):151-156.
[11]Liang D, Ye LQ, Jiang XB, et al. Biomechanical effects of cement distribution in the fractured area on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a threedimensional finite element analysis. J Surg Res,2015,195(1):246-256.
[12]Liebschner MAK, Rosenberg WS, Keaveny TM. Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty. Spine,2001,26(14):1547-1554.
[13]熊森，毛克亚，韩振川，等.应用弯角椎体成形装置修复胸腰段骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折.中国组织工程研究,2016,20(17):2496-2502.
[14]Kalevski S, Haritonov D, Peev N, et al. Surgical complications and unwated events in the modern percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment. Scripta Medica,2016,48(3):47-55.
[15]Park JH, Kim HS, Kim SW. Cement leakage into adjacent vertebral body following percutaneous vertebroplasty. Korean J Spine,2016,13(2):74-76.
[16]黄晓楠.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折治疗：注入高黏度与低黏度骨水泥的对比.中国组织工程研究,2014,18（16）：2461-2467.
[17]Hong SJ, Lee S, Yoon JS, et al. Analysis of intradiscal cement leakage during percutaneous vertebroplasty: multivariate study of risk factors emphasizing preoperative MR findings. J Neuroradiol,2014,41(3):195-201.
[18]Zhu SY, Zhong ZM, Wu Q, et al. Risk factors for bone cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty: a retrospective study of four hundred and eighty five patients. Int Orthop,2016,40(6):1205-1210.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：蚌埠医学院自然科学重点项目（BYKY2019134ZD）;蚌埠医学院科研创新团队项目（BYKC201911）**通讯作者，Email：ssngq@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-08-08