[1]马利杰 王鑫贵 郑占乐 陈晓俊 贾会扬 孙常胜 侯志勇**.CT三维重建模型下模拟髋臼前柱2种经皮置钉方法的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2020,01(3):254-258.
 Ma Lijie,Wang Xingui,Zheng Zhanle,et al.A Comparative Study of Two Percutaneous Screw Placement Methods for Anterior Column of Acetabulumon Under CT Threedimensional Reconstruction Model[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2020,01(3):254-258.
点击复制

CT三维重建模型下模拟髋臼前柱2种经皮置钉方法的比较()
分享到:

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
01
期数:
2020年3期
页码:
254-258
栏目:
实验研究
出版日期:
2020-03-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Comparative Study of Two Percutaneous Screw Placement Methods for Anterior Column of Acetabulumon Under CT Threedimensional Reconstruction Model
作者:
马利杰 王鑫贵 郑占乐 陈晓俊 贾会扬 孙常胜 侯志勇**
(河北医科大学第三医院创伤急救中心河北省骨科研究所河北省骨科生物力学实验室,石家庄050051)
Author(s):
Ma Lijie Wang Xingui Zheng Zhanle et al.
Trauma Emergency Center,The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Orthopaedic Research Institute of Hebei Province, Hebei Provincial Laboratory of Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
关键词:
髋臼影像学前柱螺钉
Keywords:
AcetabulumImagingAnterior column screw fixation
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的对比CT三维重建模型下模拟髋臼前柱2种经皮置钉方法的效果。方法选取55例正常成人骨盆CT资料构建三维模型,共110侧髋臼前柱,调整模型透明度使其类似常规X线片,分别用2种置钉方法进行置钉,A组利用出口闭孔位和入口髂骨位引导置钉,B组利用髋臼前柱轴位引导置钉,置钉完成后恢复图像为不透明状态,记录螺钉是否进入髋关节及与耻骨支的位置关系。结果55例110侧髋臼,4侧未能找到髋臼前柱轴位影像予以剔除,106侧髋臼前柱纳入研究。2组模型均无螺钉进入髋臼。A组螺钉置入优秀、良好、尚可率分别为59.4%、17.0%、23.6%,B组分别为59.4%、226%、179%,2组总体置钉质量差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.829,P=0.407)。A组女性骨盆置钉优秀、良好、尚可率分别为7.1%、21.4%、71.4%,B组分别为28.6%、21.4%、50.0%,B组置钉质量显著高于A组(Z=-3.000,P=0.003)。A组男性骨盆置钉优秀率78.2%,良好率15.4%,尚可率6.4%,B组分别为70.5%、23.1%、6.4%,2组差异无显著性(Z=-0.969,P=0.333)。结论髋臼前柱轴位可以作为引导置钉的一种手段,尤其适用于女性患者,对于男性患者,2种方法均可实现较好的置钉。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the effects of two percutaneous screw placement methods for anterior column of acetabulumon under CT threedimensional reconstruction model. MethodsA total of 55 cases of normal adult pelvic CT data were selected to built 3D model, achieving 110 acetabulum anterior columns. The model transparency were adjusted to be similar to the conventional X ray film. The data were copied into the two groups. In group A, export obturator and entry ilium were used to guide nailing. In group B, the axial position of the anterior acetabular column was used to guide nailing. After the screw placement, the image was restored to an opaque state, and the position relationship between the screw and the pubic branch was recorded.ResultsAxial images of anterior acetabular column were not found in 4 sides, and 106 sides were included in the study. No screw entered the acetabulum in both groups. Excellent, good and fair rate of screw placement were 59.4%, 17.0% and 23.6% in the group A and 594%, 22.6% and 17.9% in the group B, respectively. There was no significant difference in the quality of screw placement between the two groups (Z=-0.829, P=0.407). For female patients, excellent, good and fair rate of screw placement were 286%, 21.4% and 50.0% in the group B and 7.1%, 21.4% and 71.4% in the group A, respectively. The quality of screw placement in the group B was significantly higher than that in the group A (Z=-3.000, P=0.003). For male patients, excellent, good and fair rate of screw placement were 78.2%, 15.4% and 6.4% in the group A and 70.5%, 23.1% and 6.4% in the group B, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (Z=-0.969, P=0.333).ConclusionsThe axial position of the anterior acetabular column can be used as a means of guiding screw placement, especially for female patients. And for male patients, the both methods can achieve good screw placement.

参考文献/References:

[1]Tonetti J. Management of recent unstable fractures of the pelvic ring. An update conference supported by the Club Bassin Cotyle. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2013,99(1 Suppl):S77-S86.
[2]Zhang L, Zhang W, Mullis B, et al. Percutaneous anterior column fixation for acetabulum fractures, does it have to be difficult? The new axial pedicle view of the anterior column for percutaneous fixation. J Orthop Trauma,2016,30(1):e30-e35.
[3]Zheng Z, Wu W, Yu X, et al. Axial view of acetabular anterior column: a new Xray projection of percutaneous screw placement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2015,135(2):187-192.
[4]Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT, Grujic L. The retrograde medullary superior pubic ramus screw for the treatment of anterior pelvic ring disruptions: a new technique. J Orthop Trauma,1995,9(1):35-44.
[5]Becker CA, Kammerlander C, Cavalcanti Kumaul A, et al. Minimally invasive screw fixation is as stable as anterior plating in acetabular Ttype fractures-a biomechanical study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2018,104(7):1055-1061.
[6]Spagnolo R, Bonalumi M, Pace F, et al. Minimalinvasive posterior approach in the treatment of the posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. Chir Organi Mov,2009,93(1):9-13.
[7]Cunningham BA, Ficco RP, Swafford RE, et al. Modified iliac obliqueoutlet view: a novel radiographic technique for antegrade anterior column screw placement. J Orthop Trauma,2016,30(9):e325-e330.
[8]Chui KH, Chan CCD, Ip KC, et al. Threedimensional navigationguided percutaneous screw fixation for nondisplaced and displaced pelviacetabular fractures in a major trauma centre. Int Orthop,2018,42(6):1387-1395.
[9]Jung GH, Lee Y, Kim JW, et al. Computational analysis of the safe zone for the antegrade lag screw in posterior column fixation with the anterior approach in acetabular fracture: A cadaveric study. Injury,2017,48(3):608-614.
[10]蔡鸿敏,成传德,李红军,等.改良经皮逆行耻骨上支或髋臼前柱髓内螺钉置入技术治疗骨盆髋臼损伤.中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(9):750-756.
[11]聂玉琪,汪国栋,孟乘飞,等.三维数字规划结合导航与单纯导航下经皮髋臼前柱螺钉内固定术的对比研究.中华创伤杂志,2017,20(1):51-56.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:河北省自然科学基金(H2018206223);国家自然科学基金(81702139)**通讯作者,Email:drzyhou@gmail.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-06-19