[1]孙燕茹,韩璐*,于晓辉,等.腹腔镜窄带成像技术在腹膜型子宫内膜异位症中的诊断价值[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(12):1087-1090.
　Sun Yanru,Han Lu,Yu Xiaohui,et al.Diagnostic Value of Narrow Band Imaging for Detecting Peritoneal Endometriosis[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2017,17(12):1087-1090.
点击复制

腹腔镜窄带成像技术在腹膜型子宫内膜异位症中的诊断价值()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
17
期数:
2017年12期
页码:
1087-1090
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2017-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Diagnostic Value of Narrow Band Imaging for Detecting Peritoneal Endometriosis
作者:
孙燕茹; 韩璐*; 于晓辉; 邓燕杰; 王亚萍①
大连医科大学附属妇产医院暨大连市妇幼保健院妇科，大连116033
Author(s):
Sun Yanru;  Han Lu;  Yu Xiaohui;  et al.
Department of Gynecology, Dalian Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116033, China
关键词:
腹膜型子宫内膜异位症; 窄带成像技术; 腹腔镜
Keywords:
Peritoneal endometriosis; Narrow band imaging technology; Laparoscopy
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨腹腔镜窄带成像技术(narrow band imaging，NBI)在腹膜型子宫内膜异位症(endometriosis，EMT）中的诊断价值。方法选取2014年7月~2015年12月75例因盆腔包块或不明原因不孕或痛经在我院行腹腔镜检查和（或）手术治疗，分别于腹腔镜普通白光下和白光联合NBI模式下切除腹膜可疑病变及正常腹膜组织送病理组织学检查，比较白光与白光联合NBI 2种模式下对腹膜型EMT诊断的准确性。结果白光下可见腹膜型EMT病灶77处，病理阳性70处；白光联合NBI下可见腹膜型EMT 98处，病理阳性89处；同时腹腔镜下表面正常的腹膜随机活检52处，病理阳性5处。白光下诊断腹膜型EMT与病理诊断一致性为0.584，一致性中等；白光联合NBI下诊断腹膜型EMT和病理诊断一致性为0.798，一致性较好。白光联合NBI诊断腹膜型EMT的敏感性为94.7%(89/94)，显著高于白光74.5%(70/94)（χ2=14.719，P=0.000）；准确性为90.7%(136/150)，显著高于白光79.3%(119/150)（χ2=7.556，P=0.006）；阴性预测值90.4%(47/52)，显著高于白光67.1%(49/73)（χ2=9.222，P=0.002）。结论与白光比较，白光联合NBI下诊断腹膜型EMT有较高的准确性和敏感性，能识别更多的病灶，降低漏诊率，提高阴性预测值。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic value of narrow band imaging (NBI) in detecting peritoneal endometriosis.MethodsThis prospective study was performed in our hospital from July 2014 to December 2015. A total of 75 women undergoing laparoscopic evaluation for suspected endometriosis and/or unknown reason of infertility or dysmenorrhea were recruited in this study. They were given either ordinary white light （WL） or white light with NBI mode （WL+NBI） laparoscopic surgery. The peritoneal suspicious lesions and normal peritoneum tissue were removed and examined by histopathological examination. The accuracy of diagnosis was compared between the two modes for peritoneal endometriosis.ResultsThere were 77 peritoneal endometriosis lesions under the WL, 70 of which were pathologically positive. There were 98 peritoneal endometriosis lesions under the WL+NBI, 89 of which were pathologically positive. Laparoscopic peritoneal biopsy was randomly performed in 52 cases of normal peritoneal surface, with 5 pathologically positive cases. The consistency of identifying peritoneal endometriosis lesions by WL and pathological results was 0.584 and 0.798 by WL+NBI and pathological results. The sensitivity of WL+NBI in diagnosing peritoneal EMT was 94.7% (89/94), which was significantly higher than that of WL ［74.5% (70/94), χ2=14.719, P=0.000］. The accuracy of WL+NBI in diagnosing peritoneal EMT was 90.7% (136/150), which was significantly higher than that of WL ［79.3% (119/150), χ2=7.556, P=0.006］. The negative predictive value of WL+NBI in diagnosing peritoneal EMT was 90.4% (47/52), which was significantly higher than that of WL ［67.1% (49/73), χ2=9.222, P=0.002］.ConclusionLaparoscopic diagnosis under WL+NBI has a higher degree of accuracy and sensitivity than under WL, which can identify more lesions, reduce missed diagnosis, and improve the negative predictive value.

参考文献/References:

[1]中华医学会妇产科学分会子宫内膜异位症协作组.子宫内膜异位症的诊治指南.中华妇产科杂志,2015,50（3）:161-169.
[2]冷金花,郎景和,赵学英,等.盆腔子宫内膜异位症病灶分布特点及其腹腔镜诊断准确性的评价.中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(2):111-113.
[3]Laschke MW, Giebels C,Menger MD.Vasculogenesis: a new piece of the endometriosis puzzle.Hum Reprod Update,2011,17(5):628-636.
[4]Barrueto FF, Audlin KM, Gallicchio L, et al. Sensitivity of narrow band imaging compared with white light imaging for the detection of endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2015,22(5):846-852.
[5]Barrueto FF, Audlin KM.The use of narrowband imaging for identification of endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2008,15(5):636-639.
[6]Farrugia M, Nair MS,Kotronis KV.Narrow band imaging in endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2007,14(4):393-394.
[7]张俊吉，李晓燕，冷金花，等.腹腔镜窄带成像诊断腹膜型子宫内膜异位症的价值.现代妇产科进展,2009,18(5):359-362.
[8]Marchino GL, Gennarelli G, Enria R, et al.Diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis with use of macroscopic versus histologic findings.Fertil Steril,2005,84(1):12-15.
[9]姜伟，林金芳，朱慧庭.腹腔镜下63例盆腔子宫内膜异位症外观表现及组织学分析.中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2000,16(12):729-731.
[10]Kuroda K, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, et al.Vascular density of peritoneal endometriosis using narrow-band imaging system and vascular analysis software.J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2009,16(5):618-621.
[11]孔亮，段华.窄带光成像技术在内镜诊断中的应用.中国微创外科杂志,2013,13(12):1140-1144.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，E-mail：13940801858@163.com①病理科
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-21